TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP PEDOMAN RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP)

Autor(s): Melkianus Suluh, Yuliana Sesi Bitu
DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.282

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) determine the level of understanding of STKIP Weetebula students on RPP components, and (2) the ability of STKIP Weetebula students in preparing lesson plans. This research was conducted in Sumba Barat Daya District, East Nusa Tenggara. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The research subjects were taken by purposive random sampling technique, as many as 40 people from 130 students spread over 4 study programs. Data collection uses an open questionnaire instrument and RPP format equipped with SK and KD according to the sub-field of research. The conclusion of the results of this study is first, students' understanding of the Learning Implementation Plan or RPP component is basically good, but in practice, students need to be trained to implement RPP. In addition, students 'understanding of the learning model needs to be improved, this is in line with the results of the students' work in preparing the student lesson plans, not paying enough attention to the model steps. Second, the ability to prepare lesson plans. Students in preparing lesson plans are generally good. The weakness of the student lies in the ability to describe KD in the form of indicators not yet answering the minimum KD standards, learning objectives have not shown goals that can be measured and achieved, to differentiate indicators from objectives, students only add student subjects, and use the same operational verbs for all purposes learning no mention of the forms of apperception activities carried out. At the core activities, the learning steps are not in accordance with the stages of the learning model, and in the final activity there is no explanation of the direct or indirect benefits of the material being taugh.

Keywords: Student understanding, Learning Implementation Plan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Asril, Z. 2013. Microteaching Disertai Dengan Pedoman Pengalaman Lapangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Danielson, C. 2006. Teacher Leadership: That Strengbens Professional Practice. Virginia: ASCD.

Dianti, Puspa. 2014. Integrasi Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan kewarganegaraan Untuk Mengembangkan Karakter Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 23 (1). Retrieved from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpis/article/view/2062

DEPDIKNAS. 2003. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: DEPDIKNAS.

DEPDIKNAS. 2005. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: DEPDIKNAS.

Kemendikbud. 2016. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kunandar. 2014. Penilaian Autentik Penilaian HAsil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan KUrikulum 2013. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Majid, A. 2008. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja RosdaKarya.

Rasmiati, R., Mustamin, A., Kodirun. 2018. Efektivitas Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik (PMR) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, 3 (2), 32-41. Retrieved from http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JPBM/article/view/5731

Rosyada, D. 2013. Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis Sebuah Model Perlibatan Masyarakat Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sanjaya, W. 2013. Perencanaan & Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sanjaya, W. 2014. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Saregar, A., Latifah, S., Sari, M. 2016. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran CUPs: Dampak Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Peserta Didik Madrasah Aliyah Mathla’ul Anwar Gisting Lampung. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al BiRuNi, 05(2) 233-243 Retrieved from http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al-biruni/article/view/123

Seknun, M. Y. 2014. Telaah Kritis Terhadap Perencanaan Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 17 (1), 80-91, Retrieved from http://103.55.216.55/index.php/lentera_pendidikan/article/view/517

Sholeh, M. 2007. Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Geografi Tingkat SMA Dalam Konteks KTSP. Jurnal Geografi, 4(2), 129-137 Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JG/article/view/104

Supardi. 2014. Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sunita, Ni wayan. Nardus, Emilia Oktavia. 2018. Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Apersepsi Scene Setting terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika dengan Mengontrol Motivasi Berprestasi. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 7 (1), 29-37, Retrieved from https://ojs.ikippgribali.ac.id/index.php/emasains/article/view/80

Surya, M. 2014. Psikologi Guru Konsep dan Aplikasi Dari Guru, Untuk Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Qalbi, U. N., R, M., Jufri, & Yusri. 2017. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Teams Games Tournaments Dalam Keterampilan Menulis Bahasa Jerman Siswa Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri 1 Bontonompo Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Insani, 20 (1), 67-72, Retrieved from http://ojs.unm.ac.id/Insani/article/view/4882

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.