The Utilization Of Digital Literacy Resources By The Teachers In The Selected High Schools In Sumbawa

Authors

M. Ilmi Saqiran , Untung Waluyo , Henny Soepriyanti , Ni Wayan Mira Susanti

DOI:

10.29303/jcar.v7i1.10231

Published:

2025-01-22

Issue:

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Februari 2025

Keywords:

Digital Literacy Resources, Teachers, SMAN 1 Alas and SMAN 1 Alas Barat

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Saqiran, M. I., Waluyo, U., Soepriyanti, H., & Susanti, N. W. M. (2025). The Utilization Of Digital Literacy Resources By The Teachers In The Selected High Schools In Sumbawa . Journal of Classroom Action Research, 7(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v7i1.10231

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
29
Jan 22 '25Jan 25 '25Jan 28 '25Jan 31 '25Feb 01 '25Feb 04 '25Feb 07 '25Feb 10 '25Feb 13 '25Feb 16 '25Feb 19 '256.0
|

Abstract

This study aims to examine the utilization of digital literacy resources by teachers in two selected schools in Sumbawa, representing urban and rural areas, by exploring the types of digital literacy resources used, teachers' preferences, and the reasons behind their choices. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by Fred Davis, which suggests that teachers tend to prioritize Perceived Usefulness (PU) over Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU). This study employs a qualitative method with a case study design. Data collection involved triangulation techniques, including interviews, observations, and document analysis, to ensure data accuracy and reduce bias. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. The findings reveal that Davis's theory applies only in specific contexts. The teachers in the urban school were found to prioritize PU over PEOU, utilizing a variety of digital literacy resources, although some demonstrated limited use due to age and technology stuttering. Conversely, the teachers in the rural school prioritized PEOU over PU due to a lack of training, the absence of integration policies, and limited initiatives to incorporate digital literacy resources into teaching.

References

Aditama, W. B., Ramdani, A., & Khairunnisa, K. (2021). Penerapan Computer Based Instruction Model Simulasi dalam Pembelajaran IPA Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 3(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v3i1.651

Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer Technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Goudge, T. A. (1955). What is a Population? Philosophy of Science, 22(4), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/287442

Gunawan, G., Purwoko, A. A., Ramdani, A., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Pembelajaran menggunakan learning management systemberbasis moodle pada masa pandemi covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 2(1), 226-235

Habibi, A., Muhaimin, N., Asrial, N., Mukminin, A., & Hadisaputra, P. (2020). Science teachers’ integration of digital resources in education: A survey in rural areas of one Indonesian province. Heliyon, 6(8), e04631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04631

Hadisaputra, S., Gunawan, G., & Yustiqvar, M. (2019). Effects of green chemistry based interactive multimedia on the students' learning outcomes and scientific literacy. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems (JARDCS), 11(7), 664-674.

Hanan, A., Firman, E., & Putri, A. N. (2022). Investigating English Teachers’ Digital Literacy In The Context Of Online Learning. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i3.3544

Jung, J., Choi, S., & Fanguy, M. (2024b). Exploring teachers’ digital literacy experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(2), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i2.7572

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030

Lesasunanda, R. A., & Malik, A. (2024). Peningkatan Kualitas Guru Melalui Literasi Digital di MAN 1 Sumbawa. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(3), 1904–1915. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i3.2365

Millar, M., & Schrier, T. (2015). Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which do Students Prefer and Why? Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(2), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2015.1026474

Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019b). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017b). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Odell, J. S. (2001). Case study Methods in International Political economy. International Studies Perspectives, 2(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00047

Pranoto, P. (2021). Pemanfaatan Multimedia dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran IPA tentang Sruktur Tanah. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 3(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v3i1.649

Purnamasari, R., Suchyadi, Y., Karmila, N., Nurlela, N., Santa, Mirawati, M., Handayani, R., Indriani, R. S., Anwar, W. S., & Kurnia, D. (2020). Student Center Based Class Management Assistance Through The Implementation Of Digital Learning Models And Media. Journal Of Community Engagement, 2(2), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.33751/jce.v2i2.2801

Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A scoping review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(8), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011

Supriyatno, H. B., Hakim, A., Ningsih, S., & Herawati, S. (2024). Analysis of Indonesia’s human resource development. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(IV), 2326–2333. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.804236

Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: a prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment?. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 54–65. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1099109.pdf

Turner, D. P. (2020). Sampling methods in research design. Headache the Journal of Head and Face Pain, 60(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13707

Wiguna, N. K. A. (2023). Analisis Kompetensi Literasi Digital pada Guru Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Komunikasi, 3(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrmk.v3i1.2316

Yustiqvar, M., Hadisaputra, S., & Gunawan, G. (2019). Analisis penguasaan konsep siswa yang belajar kimia menggunakan multimedia interaktif berbasis green chemistry. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 14(3), 135-140.

Author Biographies

M. Ilmi Saqiran, University of Mataram

Untung Waluyo, Universitas Mataram

Henny Soepriyanti, Universitas Mataram

Ni Wayan Mira Susanti, Universitas Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2025 M. Ilmi Saqiran, Untung Waluyo, Henny Soepriyanti, Ni Wayan Mira Susanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).