Exploring students’ perceptions of the mandatory TOEFL ITP test and its relationship with academic anxiety: A study on final-year students at Hamzanwadi University
DOI:
10.29303/jcar.v7i4.12685Published:
2025-11-30Downloads
Abstract
In Indonesia, many universities have implemented the TOEFL ITP test as a mandatory graduation requirement to ensure students’ English proficiency meets academic and professional standards. This study aimed to examine the relationship between students’ perceptions of the mandatory TOEFL ITP policy and their academic anxiety. Using a quantitative correlational design, data were collected from 25 final-year students of the English Education Study Program at Hamzanwadi University through an online questionnaire consisting of two parts: perceptions of the TOEFL ITP policy (8 items) and academic anxiety (10 items), both measured on a four-point Likert scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation. The results showed that students’ perceptions were moderate (M = 22.32, SD = 3.22), and their academic anxiety was also moderate (M = 27.64, SD = 5.45). The Pearson correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between students’ perceptions and their academic anxiety (r = 0.023, p = 0.911, p > 0.05). This finding indicates that students’ perceptions of the TOEFL ITP policy do not have a direct effect on their academic anxiety levels, rather, anxiety is influenced by factors such as readiness, confidence, and coping strategies. Theoretically, this study provides new insights into the link between language testing policies and psychological responses, while practically, it suggests that universities should offer preparatory programs, counseling services, and institutional support to help students manage anxiety and perform better in the TOEFL ITP test. Overall, the study highlights the need to integrate assessment policies with student well-being strategies in higher education
Keywords:
TOEFL ITP Student Perception Academic Anxiety Graduation RequirementReferences
Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., & Maisarah, I. (2024). Enhancing TOEFL performance and student motivation through Integrated flipped and gamified learning in online settings. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1054242
Budiman, J., Jaswadi, I., Putra, R., Rohani, M. L., & Halilurrahman. (2023). Enhancing English lan-guage proficiency: Strategies for improving student skills. JSRET (Journal of Scientific, Research, Ed-ucation, and Technology), 2(3), 1118–1120.
Dalimunte, A. A., Tika, A., Dalimunte, M., Tanjung, A. P., & Suryani, I. (2023). Evaluating TOEFL ITP test: A critical review. Humanitatis Journal of Language and Literature, 9(2), 245–254.
Habibah, N., Nurcahyo, N., Fiani, R. G., & Ca-hyapradana, I. (2021). Does EFL remote learners’ anxiety affect their English proficiency? A case in a university distant classroom during pandemic COVID-19. Edulitics (Education Literature and Linguistics) Journal, 6(1), 14–24.
Hendrawaty, N., Angkarini, T., & Retnomurti, A. B. (2023). Undergraduate students’ perceptions on online English proficiency test. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 56(2), 310–323.
Husna, R. (2022). Students’ perception toward the TOEFL ITP requirement in higher education. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 115–126.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer
Muliawati, F., Hartati, T., & Rahmawati, D. (2020). Test-related stress among Indonesian university students. Indonesian Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1), 22–31.
Muliawati, I., Ismail, N. M., Lismalinda, N., & Rizka, B. (2020). Test-taking anxiety among EFL university students in TOEFL test: A case study from Indone-sian context. Humanities & Social Sciences Re-views, 8(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8321
Oktaviani, L., & Mandasari, B. (2020). PowToon: A digital medium to optimize students’ cultural presentation in ELT classroom. Teknosastik, 18(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v18i1.526
Pranawengtias, W. (2022). Undergraduate students’ moti-vation on English language learning at Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 27–32.
Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interfer-ence: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 929–938.
Shengyao, L., Wang, X., & Liu, H. (2024). Self-efficacy and academic stress among language learners. Interna-tional Journal of Educational Research, 118, 102231.
Soetjipta, M. J. (2023). Evaluation of effectiveness of the TOEFL ITP short course test program at CLT Unika Soegijapranata on obtaining the expected score. Journal of Management and Business Environ-ment (JMBE), 4(2), 142–149.
Utami, B. R., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2022). Does self-esteem influence student English proficiency test scores?. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 16–20.
Wahyuni, D. (2024). Students’ perception of the TOEFL test as a graduation requirement. Asian EFL Journal, 31(4), 188–205.
Wahyuni, L. E. N. (2024). Do college students still need the TOEFL test as one of graduation requirements?. Majapahit Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 192–216.
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. Ple-num Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jannatu Kholdi Al-Hafizi, Yulia Agustina, Astrid Dwimaulani, M. Adib Nazri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
