Analisis Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Bangun Ruang
DOI:
10.29303/jcar.v5i1.3713Published:
2023-05-17Downloads
Abstract
Mathematics is the science that teaches numbers and others which are also related to the process of solving a problem. Solving a problem requires a person's thinking process to solve the problem. The thinking process is a step or a path taken to solve a problem. The purpose of this research it’s to explain the thinking process of students in solving problems of geometry. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive study. The subjects in this study were 6 undergraduate students of Mathematics Education at Sanata Dharma University. The research instrument used was a question containing the problem of building space that asked students to think of ways or strategies to put books into a box that has a size and how many books can fit into the box. Furthermore, the interview was conducted to find out the answers that were not understood that came from the student's answers. Data collection techniques in this study were tests and interviews. The data analysis techniques in this study were (1) data reduction; (2) exposure data (display data); (3) drawing conclusions and verification (conclusion drawing / verifying). The results obtained in this study were 1) students could not understand the questions from the questions, 2) Students could provide strategies to solve the problems, and 3). Students still make mistakes in determining the length and width of a block
Keywords:
Construct Space Problems Student Thinking ProcessReferences
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (Depdiknas). (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Gunawan, I. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualittaif: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Khamidah, K. & Suherman. (2016). Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Kepribadian Keirsey. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 7(2), Hal 231-248.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc
Sari, D.N & Saragih, N.A. (2019). Analisis Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika dalam Menyelesaikan Matematika Tahu Akademik 2018/2019. Jurnal MathEducation Nusantara 2 (2), 107-112.
Yani, M., Ikhsan, M., & Marwan. (2016). Perbedaan Berpikir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1).
Yanti, AP., & Syazali. (2016). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Bransford dan Stein Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 63-74.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Florida Moza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
