Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Terhadap Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pada Perkuliahan Pendidikan IPA SD

Authors

Anindita SHM Kusuma , Ahmad Busyairi

DOI:

10.29303/jcar.v5iSpecialIssue.3835

Published:

2023-06-24

Issue:

Vol. 5 No. SpecialIssue (2023): Mei

Keywords:

Guided-inquiry, Metacognitive skills, Critical thinking ability

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Kusuma, A. S., & Busyairi, A. (2023). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Terhadap Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pada Perkuliahan Pendidikan IPA SD. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5(SpecialIssue), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v5iSpecialIssue.3835

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Students' metacognitive skills and critical thinking ability in Elementary Science Education lectures are still low, one of which is caused by conventional learning strategies that still dominate on lectures. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the guided-inquiry learning strategy on the metacognitive skills and critical thinking ability of students in elementary science education courses. The research method uses quasi-experimental quantitative research, a nonequivalent control group design. The research population was PGSD Undergraduate Study Program students who were taking Elementary Science Education lectures. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that there is an influence of guided-inquiry learning strategies on students' metacognitive skills and critical thinking ability. The corrected average for the metacognitive skills of the experimental class was 79.998, which was higher than the corrected average for the control class, which was 77.003. This shows that the metacognitive skills of students who are taught using the guided-inquiry strategy are higher than the metacognitive skills of students who are taught using conventional learning strategies. The average corrected critical thinking for the experimental class, which is 80.950, is higher than the corrected average for the control class, which is 78.105. This shows that the critical thinking ability of students who are taught using the guided-inquiry strategy are higher than the critical thinking ability of students who are taught using conventional learning strategies

References

Adnan & Bahri, A. (2018). Beyond effective teaching: Enhancing students’ metacognitive skill through guided inquiry. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 954 (2018) 012022 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012022.

Alberta, L. (2004). Focus on Inquiry: a teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning. Edmonton: Alberta education.

Amri, S. (2015). Implementasi pembelajaran aktif dalam kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakakarya.

Arends, R. I. (2009). Learning to Teach. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Corebima, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive Skill Measurment Integrated in Achievement Test. Makalah disajikan pada The Third CosMED di Penang, Malaysia.

Dewi, E. P. P., Ratman & Mustapa, K. (2020). The Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on Reaction Rate Topic: The Case of An Indonesian Public School. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia. Vol. 5, No. 2, Desember 2020, hal. 66-77.

Duran, M & Dokme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 12(12), 2887-2908.

Fleur, D. S., Bredewerg, B., & Bos, W. V. D. (2021). Metacognition: Ideas and Insights From Neuro and Educational Sciences. npj Science of Learning Vol. 6, No. 13 (2021)

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring a New Area of Cognitive — Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906

Fristadi, R & Bharata, H. (2015). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dengan Problem Based Learning. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Uny 2015. ISBN. 978-602-73403-0-5.

Goctu, R. (2017). Metacognitive Strategies in Academic Writing. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 2(2), 82–96.

Gravetter, F. J & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences 10th. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Halpern, D. F & Dunn, D. S. (2021). Critical Thinking: A Model of Intelligence for Solving Real-World Problems. Journal of Intelligence 9: 22. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jintelligence9020022.

Hidayah, R & Lestari, F. D. (2014). Implementation of Guided-Inquiry to Promote Students’ Metacognitive Self-Regulation in XI Grade. Procceding of International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta) p 91-96.

Irawati, F., Kurniawan H. C., Primandiri, P. R & Santoso A. M. (2015). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Studying Models Toward Skills of Inquiry and Skills of Metacognition for Students of XI Science Grade SMAN 6 Kediri. Procceding National Seminar of Biologi Education XII. Faculty of Teacher Training and Educational Science, Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Solo) p 483-487.

Iswara, E & Sundayana, R. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing dan Direct Instruction dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 223-234.

Jamaluddin, U., & Rachmadtullah., R. (2018). Pembelajaran Pendidikan IPS (Teori Konsep dan Aplikasi Bagi Guru dan Mahasiswa). Bekasi: CV Nurani.

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students’ Attitude towards Natural Sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395.

Kurniawan, A. D. (2013). Metode Inkuiri Terbimbing dalam Pembuatan Media Pembelajaran Biologi untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kreativitas Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2503.

Madu, B. C. (2020). Scientific Explanation of Phenomenon, Imagination and Concept Formation as Correlates of Students’ Understanding of Physics Concepts. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 11(16), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.7176/jnsr/11-16-03https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20732.

Martin, W. E &Bridgmon, K. D. (2012). Quantitatif and Statistical Research Methods. CA: John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Maulidiya, M & Nurlaelah, E. (2018). The effect of Problem-based Learning on Critical Thinking Ability in Mathematics Education. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2018). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042063.

Muhali. (2013). Analisis kemampuan metakognisi siswa dalam pembelajaran kimia. Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia “Hydrogenâ€, 1(1), 1-7.

Mu’minin, S. K. F & Azizah. U. (2014). Student Metacognitive Skill Through Inquiry Learning Models in Acid Base Matter in SMAN 1 Pacet Xi Grade. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education Vol. 3, No.02, pp.67-74, May 2014. ISSN: 2252-9454.

Nasutin, S. W. R. (2018). Penerapan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing (Guided-inquiry) dalam Meningkatkan Kemmapuan Berpikir Kritis pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal of Education and Development. Vol. 3, No. 1, Jnauari 2018.

Ndjangala, M. N. N., Abah, J., & Mashebe, P. (2021). Teachers’ views on challenges affecting learners’ performance in natural science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 48–56.

Pandey, G. K. Nanda & Ranjan, V. (2011). Effectiveness of inquiry training model over conventional teaching method on academic achievement of science student in India. Journal of Innovative Research in Education.1 (1), March, (2011). (pp.7-20).

Peters, M. (2000). Does constructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education? Journal of Nursing Education 39 166-170.

Pribadi, B. A., Icwan., & Purnama, D. A. (2022). Online Learning Based on Constructivism to Support Universitas Terbuka Distant Learners. Jurnal Teknodik Vol. 26, No.1.

Purba, D. N., Damanik, M., Silaban, S., & Simatupang, L. (2018). The Difference Of Student’s Activities and Learning Outcome With Problem-Based Learning Using Macromedia Flash and Handout. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 10(3), 403–408, doi: 10.24114/jpkim.v10i3.12704.

Rafiqa, I., Tjandrakirana, & Soetjipto. (2017). Penerapan perangkat Pembelajaran model inkuiri terbimbing (Guided Inquiry) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA. Journal of Biology Education, 6(3), 265–273.

Raykov, T & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis. UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, Inc.

Rovai, A. P., Baker, J. D., Ponton, M. K. (2014). Social Science Research Design and Statistics: A Practitioner’s Guide to Research Methods and IBM SPSS Analysis. US: Wtertree Press LLC.

Sanjaya, W. (2014). Strategi pembelajaran: Berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Seranica, C., Purwoko, A. A., & Hakim, A. (2018). Influence of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Critical Thinking Skills. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) e-ISSN: 2320–7388, p-ISSN: 2320–737X Volume 8, Issue 1 Ver. II (Jan. – Feb. 2018).

Saekawati, R. & Nasrudin, H. (2021). Effectiveness of guided inquiry-based on blended learning in improving critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 53-68.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assesing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19, 460-475

Shively, K., Rubenstein, R. D & Stith, K. (2018). Measuring What Matters: Assessing Creativity, Critical Thinking and the Design Process. Gifted Child Today Journal, Vol. 41, No. 3.

Siebert, C. F & Siebert, D. C. (2018). Data Analysis with Small Samples and Non-Normal Data Nonparametrics and Other Strategies. UK: Oxford University Press.

Suantara, I. K. T., Hartono., Susilaningsih, E. (2022). The Effectiveness of Guided-inquiry Learning Model Using TPS Approach of Science Process Skills and Conceptual Understanding. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6 (3).https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i3.49345.

Supartini, K. W. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Direct Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Food and Beverage pada Kompetensi Menerapkan Teknik Platting dan Garnish. Journal of Education Action Research, 5(2), 194-199. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v5i2.33340.

Thomas, G., Anderson, D., Nashon, S. 2008. Development of An Instrument Designed to Investigated Elements of Science Students Metacognition, Self-Efficacy and Learning Process: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education Vol. 30, No. 13, 17 October 2008, pp. 1701-1724.

Thursinawati, T. (2012). Penerapan Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Siswa. Visi, III (1), 83–99.

Wildt, A. R & Ahtola, O. T. (1978). Analysis of Covariance. CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Yustina, I. I., & Sugiarto, B. (2012). Korelasi antara keterampilan metakognitif dengan hasil belajar siswa di senior high schooln 1 Dawarblandong, Mojokerto. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 1(2), 78-83.

Zakirman., Gusta, W., Rahayu, C. (2022). Analysis of Problems in Science Learning at The Elementary School. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i1.349.

Zakiah, L., & Lestari, I. (2019). Berpikir Kritis dalam Konteks Pembelajaran. Bogor: Erzatama Karya Abadi.

Author Biographies

Anindita SHM Kusuma, Universitas Mataram

Ahmad Busyairi, Universitas Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Anindita SHM Kusuma, Ahmad Busyairi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).