Mathematical Literacy Ability in HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) Problem Solving of Class VIII Students

Authors

Muhammad Iqbal , M. Turmuzi , Junaidi , Laila Hayati

DOI:

10.29303/jcar.v5iSpecialIssue.4395

Published:

2023-06-24

Issue:

Vol. 5 No. SpecialIssue (2023): Mei

Keywords:

Mathematical Literacy, HOTS problem solving

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Iqbal, M. ., M. Turmuzi, Junaidi, & Hayati, L. . (2023). Mathematical Literacy Ability in HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) Problem Solving of Class VIII Students . Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5(SpecialIssue), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v5iSpecialIssue.4395

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aimed to find out and describe the mathematical literacy ability of class VIII students of SMP Negeri 7 Mataram for the 2022/2023 academic year in solving HOTS problems. Therefore the type of research used is descriptive research. The sample in this study was students of class VIII SMP Negeri Mataram. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with a sample of 80 people. Data collection uses written test techniques in descriptions declared valid and feasible. Data collection was carried out directly and implemented by the school. The appropriate question descriptions are given to students to solve so that data on the scores of students' answers in answering the descriptions of HOTS questions and the level of mathematical literacy are obtained. After the data collection of students' answer scores is completed, the data is examined. The data that has been examined is then processed, tabulated, grouped, and analyzed to obtain research results that show that students have not been able to reach level 4 as much as 12.5%. Students who can reach level 4 are only 37.5%, while for levels 5 and 6, only 36.25% and 13.75%, respectively, for the level of mathematical literacy ability of class VIII students of SMPN 7 Mataram for the academic year 2022/2023 in solving HOTS problems the majority are high and very high with 43.75% and 48, 75%. Thus, the higher the problem-solving ability of students, the higher the level of literacy that can be achieved.

References

Abdussakir. (2018). Literasi Matematis dan Upaya Pengembangan dalam Pembelajaran di Kelas. Sumenep: Seminar Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Sumenep

Basri, K., Baidowi, B., Junaidi, J., & Turmuzi, M. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas VIII SMP. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 1(4), 682-694.

Hasnawati. (2016). Description of Mathematics Literacy Ability of Students First Secondary School State 15 Kendari Based on Content, Context, Materials, and Process. International Journal Education and Research Vol. 4 No. 11: 201-210.

Kurniawati, N., Prayitno, S., & Hayati, L. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Aritmatika Sosial Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Impulsif dan Reflektif Siswa MTs. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(2), 493-503.

Madyaratri, D. Y., Wardono, & Prasetyo, A. P. B. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa pada Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan Tinjauan Gaya Belajar. Prisma, Prosicing Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 648–658. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/29213

Nolaputra, A. P., Wardono, & Supriyono. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika pada Pembelajaran PBL Pendekatan RME Berbantuan Schoology Siswa SMP. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 18–32. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19672

Nusywari, W., Prayitno, S., Junaidi, J., & Hikmah, N. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 4(1), 23-33.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. Ojose, B. 2011. Mathematics for Literacy: Are We Able to put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday use?Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol 4, No 1, 89-100.

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics for Literacy: Are We Able to put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday use?Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol 4, No 1, 89-100.

Widana, I Wayan., Adi., H. A. (2019). Modul Penyusun Soal HOTS Matematika. Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Iqbal, M. Turmuzi, Junaidi, Laila Hayati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).