An Analysis of Student Errors and the Effect of Scaffolding in Solving Math Problems on Statistical Subject
DOI:
10.29303/jcar.v5i4.5696Published:
2023-12-17Issue:
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): NovemberKeywords:
Analisis Kesalahan, Scaffolding, Teori KastolanArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to describe the types of error experienced by students by referring to indicator of errors by Kastolan theory, scaffolding that can reduce student errors, and how scaffolding test affects student. This type of study is qualitative study. The subjects in this study were 4 students. The selection of subjects used simple random sampling technique. The instruments used were test instruments and interview guidelines. The data analysis technique uses the application model of Miles & Huberman’s theory: 1) Data collection, 2) Data condensation, 3) Data display, 4) Drawing and verifying conclusions. The results showed: 1) The errors experienced by students when working on test questions included three types of errors, namely conceptual error, procedural error, and technique error. The percentage of students who made conceptual errors was 35.7%, students who made procedural errors were 54.8%, and students who made technical errors were 38.1%; 2) From the application of scaffolding to 4 research subjects who committed 3 types of errors, it was obtained that conceptual errors were more suitable given scaffolding level 2, which is explaining: showing and telling. While procedural errors are more suitable given scaffolding level 2, which is explaining: telling. In the scaffolding technique errors that are suitable are level 1 scaffolding, which is reviewing: interpreting students actions; 3) After being given scaffolding, the errors made by students were significantly reduced from before being given scaffolding.
References
Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding Practices That Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9
Fatahillah, A., Wati, Y. F., & Susanto. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika berdasarkan Tahapan Newman beserta Bentuk Scaffolding yang diberikan. Kadikma, 8(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v8i1.5229
Fitriyah, M., Pristiwati, L. E., Qoh, R., & Yanti, A. W. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Koordinat Cartesius Menurut Teori Kastolan. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 8(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v8i2.1002
Gita, I., & Apsari, R. A. (2018). Scaffolding in Problem Based Learning to Increase Students ’ Achievements in Linear Algebra Scaffolding in Problem Based Learning to Increase Students ’ Achievements in Linear Algebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–7.
Hasan, B. (2019). The exploration of higher order thinking skills : students ’ difficulties and scaffolding in solving mathematical problems based on PISA. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1200/1/012010
Hayati, L., Amrullah, & Sripatmi. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Statistika Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKIP Universitas Mataram, 11–12.
Kusmaryono, I., Ubaidah, N., & Rusdiantoro, A. (2020). Strategi Scaffolding pada Pembelajaran Matematika (D. Wijayanti (ed.); Pertama). Unissula Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analiysis A Methods Sourcebook (3 ed.). SAGE.
PISA. (2018). Programme For International Student Assessement (PISA) Resullts From PISA 2018. OECD, 1–3, 1–10.
Pradani, R., Hayati, L., Wahidaturrahmi, & Baidowi. (2023). Scaffolding Berdasarkan Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematis Menggunakan Integral tak Tentu. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5(SpecialIssue), 304–314.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Pertama). Parama.
Salsabila, N. H., Lu’luilmaknun, U., Triutami, T. W., Hamdani, D., & Apsari, R. A. (2020). Proportion Problems : Analyzing Common Errors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012034
Sari, N., & Surya, E. (2017). Efektivitas Penggunaan Teknik Scaffolding dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa SMP Swasta Al-Washliyah Medan. Edumatica, 07(1), 1–10.
Susilowati, P. L., & Ratu, N. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman. Jurnal “Mosharafa,†7(1), 13–24.
Triutami, T. W., Novitasari, D., Wulandari, N. P., Purwanto, P., & Abadyo, A. (2020). The Use of Scaffolding to Enhance Students’ Ability in Solving Geometry Problems. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 465, 94–98.
Tyaningsih, R. Y., Novitasari, D., Hamdani, D., & Handayani, A. D. (2020). Pemberian Scaffolding Terhadap Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Siswa dalam Mengkonstruksi Grafik Fungsi. 1(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v1i1.9
Upu, A., Taneo, P. N. L., & Daniel, F. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman dan Upaya Pemberian Scaffolding. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(April), 53–62.
Wijaya, L. M. S., Subarinah, S., Amrullah, & Hayati, L. (2023). Analisis Kesalahan Menurut Newman dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Materi Statistika Ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5(3), 1–8.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving * (Vol. 17, Nomor September 1974). Pegamon.
Yamin, M., Triutami, T. W., & Subarinah, S. (2022). Journal of Classroom Action Research. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(4), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v4i4.2150
Author Biography
Mufti Nida Uliya, Universitas Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mufti Nida Uliya, Arjudin, Dwi Novitasari, Ketut Sarjana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
