Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kasus untuk Melatih Kemampuan Argumentasi dan Inisiatif Belajar Mahasiswa Kimia: Studi Tindakan Kelas
DOI:
10.29303/jcar.v6i3.8830Published:
2024-08-29Issue:
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Agustus 2024Keywords:
Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi, Keterampilan Belajar Kimia, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Pengetahuan AwalArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Tindakan kelas untuk memperbaiki kondisi pembelajaran Kimia Bahan Makanan menggunakan pembelajaran berbasis kasus. Melalui kasus diharapkan mahasiswa dapat mengalami peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi dan inisiatif belajar. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam tiga siklus dengan indikator meliputi kemampuan argumentasi dan inisiatif belajar. Kemampuan argumentasi daan inisitatif belajar yang digunakan adalah > 60% dengan kategori tinggi. Instrumen kemampuan argumentasi terdiri atas tiga indicator yaitu menentukan klaim, memberikan bukti dan memberikan pembenaran. Inisiatif belajar menggunakan kuesioner dengan lima pernyataan. Data yang diperoleh dihitung dan diinterpolisasikan pada table kategorisasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi dan inisiatif belajar sesuai indicator yang ditetapkan pada siklus 3. Skor tertinggi pada indicator menentukan klaim dan skor terendah pada memberikan pembenaran dari kemampuan argumentasi dari ketiga siklus. Inisiatif belajar tertinggi pada pernyataan inisiatif menyampaikan argumentasi dan skor terendah pada kesempatan mencari waktu lebih jika tidak memahami kasus yang diberikan. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi pada penerapan pembelajaran berbasis kasus untuk melatih kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa. Namun disarankan sebelum penerapan pembelajaran berbasis kasus diharapkan pengajar mereview kembali konsep prasayarat yang terhubung dengan kasus yang dibahas sehingga mahasiswa dapat lebih mudah mencari pembenaran dari klaim dan bukti yang ditemukan
References
Al-Afifi, M., & Ambusaidi, A. (2014). The relationship between the level of investigative skills and logical thinking capabilities among students of the tenth grade in Muscat Governorate/Sultanate of Oman. An-Najah University Journal for Research (Humanities), 11(28), 2522-2556.
Al-Ajmi, B., & Ambusaidi, A. (2022). The Level of Scientific Argumentation Skills in Chemistry Subject among Grade 11th Students: The Role of Logical Thinking. Science Education International, 33(1), 66-74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7
Al-Roomy, M.A. (2023). The relationship among students’ learning styles. Health sciences colleges and Grade Point Average (GPA). Advenaces in Medical Education and Practice, 14, 203-213. Doi: 10.2147/AMEP.s395720
Altowaiji, S., Haddadin, R., Campos, P., Sorn, S., Gonzalez, L., Villafan, S.M., & Groves, M.N. (2021). Measuring the effectiveness of online preparation videos and questions in the second semester general chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22, 616-625.
Alvaro C. E. S., Abad A. M., & Nudelman N. S. (2019). Towards a holistic approach to sustainability in the Argentine Patagonia Research results and educational proposal. Int. J. Sustainable High Educ., 20(5), 951–963.
Anwar, Y. A. S., Mutiah, M., Idrus, S. W. A., Junaidi, E., & Rahmawati, R. (2022). Development of case-based learning model on biochemistry online learning. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i1.2992
Blewett, E.L., & Kisamore, J.L. (2009). Evaluation of an interactive, case-based review session in teaching medical microbiology. BMC Med Educ., 9, 56.
Bozgun, K., Gul Ozaskin-Arslan, A., & Ulucinar-Sagir, S. (2023). COVID-19 and Distance Education: Evaluation in the Context of Twenty-first Century Skills. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,32, 417–428 doi: 10.1007/s40299-022-00663-4.
Chen, Y.C., Benus, M.J., & Hernandez, J. (2019). Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. Science Education, 103(5), 1235-1276.
Dong, A., Jong, M.S.Y., & King, R.B. (2020). How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Learning Engagement? The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Load and Help-Seeking. Front. Psychol., 11, 591203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203
Drame, I., Gibson, C.M., Nonyel, N.P., et al. (2022). Strategies for incorporating health disparities and cultural competency training into the pharmacy curriculum and co-curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ., 86(3), 8631. https://doi.org/10.5688 /ajpe8631 PMid:35027357
Escola-Gascon, A., & Gallifa, J. (2022). How to measure soft skills in the educational context: psychometric properties of the skills-in-one questionnaires. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101155. Doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101155.
Glenn, C.D., & Odeleye, O.O. (2024). Exploring factors within an introductory course that influence students’ perception of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25, 775-785. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RP00008K
Hoper, J., Jegstad, K.M., & Remmen, K.B. (2022). Student teachers’ problem-based investigations of chemical phenomena in the nearby outdoor environment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23, 361-372. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00127B
Ilcin, N., Tomruk, M., Yesilyaprak, S.S., Karadibak, D., & Sauci, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 18(291), 1-8. Doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1400-2
Kalpakian, J.V. & Marzouk, A. (2023). Generation Z: Implications for Universities. ELite Journal : International Journal of Education, Language, and Literature, 3(1), 35-45.
Khishfe, R. (2012). Relationship between nature of science understanding and argumentation skills. A role for counterargument and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489-514.
Leijon, M., Gudmundsson, P., Staaf, P., & Christersson, C. (2022). Challenge based learning in higher education–A systematic literature review. Innov Educ Teach Int., 59(5), 609-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503
Loghmani, T.M., Bayliss, A.J., Strunk, V., Altenburger, P. (2011). An integrative, longitudinal case-based learning model as a curriculum strategy to enhance teaching and learning. J Phys Ther Educ., 25(2), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/ 00001416-201101000-00008
McFee, R.M., Cupp, A.S., & Wood, J.R. (2018). Use of case-based or hands on laboratory exercises with physiology lectures improves knowledge retention, but veterinary medicine students prefer case-based activities. Adv Physiol Educ., 42(2):182-91. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00084.2017 PMid:29616580
McLean, S.F. (2016). Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: A review of worldwide literature. J Med Educ Curric Dev., 3, JMECD.S20377.
Ortadeveci, A., Ermez, M.N., Oz, S., & Ozden, H. (2022). A survey study on distance anatomy education: Challenges unique to anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat., 44(1), 41-7. https://doi.org /10.1007/s00276-021-02772-z
Panich, W. (2012). The way to create learning for pupils in the 21st century (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Sodsri Foundation.
Raza, A., & Hussain, N. (2022). Problems and challenges of future medical education: Current state and development prospects. Futurity Educ., 2(3), 31-43. https://doi.org/ 10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.32
Remmen K. B., Jegstad K. M., & Höper J. (2020). Preservice teachers’ reflections on outdoor science activities following an outdoor chemistry unit. J. Sci. Teacher Educ., 1–19.
Sánchez-Ruíz, M. J., Fernández-Balboa, J. M., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Predictors of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) interest and academic achievement in Mexican high school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00332-5
Schank RC, Langer E. Goal based scenarios Beliefs, Reasoning and Decision Making: Psycho-Logic in Honour of Bob Abelson. 1994 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates:1–32
Thibaut, D., & Schroeder, K.T. (2020). A case-based learning approach to online biochemistry labs during COVID-19. Biochem Mol Biol Educ., 48, 484–485. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21408
Timilsena, N.P., Maharjan, K.B., & Devkota, K.M. (2022). Teachers’ and students’ experiences in chemistry learning difficulties. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(10), 2856-2867.
Touroutoglou, A., Lindquist, K. A., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2015). Intrinsic connectivity in the human brain does not reveal networks for ‘basic’ emotions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv013
UNESCO. (2023). The future of higher education: skills for the world of tomorrow. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/
Wasilczuk, J. E., & Richert-Kaźmierska, A. (2020). What potential entrepreneurs from generation Y and Z lack-IEO and the role of E.E. Education Sciences, 10(11), 331.
Xu, L., Zhang, J., Ding, Y., Sun, G., Zhang, W., Philbin, S.P., & Guo, B.H.W. (2022). Assessing the impact of digital education and the role of the big data analytics course to enhance the skills and employability of engineering students. Front. Psychol., 13, 1-20. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974574.
Yunus, F.W., & Ali, Z.M. (2018). Attitude towards learning chemistry among secondary school students in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 3(9), 63-70. Doi: 10.21834/ajbes.v3i9.61
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yunita Arian Sani Anwar, Muti’ah Muti’ah, Eka Junaidi, Ermia Hidayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
