Karakteristik Instrumen Tes Literasi Digital Ditinjau dari Validitas Isi dan Validitas Empiris (Kecocokan Butir dengan Model, Reliabilitas, serta Tingkat Kesukaran Butir)
DOI:
10.29303/jcar.v6i4.9650Published:
2024-11-29Issue:
Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): November 2024Keywords:
Instrumen Tes, Literasi Digital, Pengembangan Instrumen, Teori Respon ButirArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen tes literasi digital dalam pembelajaran fisika. Penelitian yang dilakukan menggunakan model pengembangan instrumen tes oleh (Mardapi, 2008). Prosedur pengembangan terdiri dari tiga tahap, yaitu: tahap pembuatan instrumen, tahap analisis tes, dan tahap uji coba tes. Subjek pada penelitian ini yaitu peserta didik kelas XII MIPA sejumlah 269 peserta didik. Analisis validitas isi menggunakan Validitas Aiken’s V. Analisis empiris menggunakan Teori Respon Butir dengan memanfaatkan program QUEST dan Parscale. Analisis butir yang dilakukan meliputi kecocokan model, reliabilitas butir, dan tingkat kesukaran. Instrumen tes literasi digital yang dikembangkan dinyatakan telah memenuhi syarat untuk digunakan sebagai alat ukur yang valid dan reliabel dengan karakteristik sebagai berikut: nilai validitas isi untuk semua butir soal dinyatakan valid; secara keseluruhan butir soal literasi digital yang dikembangkan fit dengan model Rasch; nilai reliabilitas tes yang dihasilkan masuk dalam kategori istimewa; tingkat kesukaran 9 butir soal secara keseluruhan memiliki tingkat kesukaran yang baik dan beragam (terdapat butir soal yang mudah, sedang, sulit).
References
Al-Qallaf, C. L., & Al-Mutairi, A. S. R. (2016). Digital literacy and digital content supports learning. The Electronic Library, 34(3), 522–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2015-0076
Andayani, A., Ramalis, T. R., Studi, P., Fisika, P., Pendidikan, F., Alam, P., & Indonesia, U. P. (2019). Kajian implementasi teori respon butir dalam menganalisis instrumen tes materi fisika. 0.
Ardiansyah, Risnita, & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan Pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jurnal IHSAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57
Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7395–7419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5
Darmana, A., Sutiani, A., Nasution, H. A., Ismanisa*, I., & Nurhaswinda, N. (2021). Analysis of Rasch Model for the Validation of Chemistry National Exam Instruments. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i3.19618
Farias-Gaytan, S., Aguaded, I., & Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Transformation and digital literacy: Systematic literature mapping. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1417–1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10624-x
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (Sixteenth). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Istiyono, E. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika. UNY Press.
Mardapi, D. (2008). pengukuran penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Parama Publishing.
Marín, V. I., & Castañeda, L. (2023). Developing Digital Literacy for Teaching and Learning. Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education, 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_64
Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2024). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: a review. In Journal of Computers in Education (Vol. 11, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5
Nurhasanah, Supahar, Agustina, E., Nabila, S. A., & Rahayu, P. (2021). Developing Physics Digital Literacy Skill Diagnostic Test Assisted by Google Form for Senior High School Students. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.049
Porat, E., Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2018). Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students’ perceived competencies versus actual performance. In Computers and Education (Vol. 126). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.030
Pradita, E., Megawanti, P., & Indraprasta PGRI, U. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda, dan Fungsi Distraktor PTS Matematika SMPN Jakarta. Original Research, 3(80), 109–118.
Prihatni, Y., Kumaidi, & Mundilarto. (2016). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Volume 20, No 1, Juni 2016 (111- ) Online: http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 111–125.
Putra, A. S. U., Hamidah, I., & Nahadi. (2019). Pengembangan tes diagnostik four-tier untuk materi gelombang dan optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 1–9. http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf
Rahmawan, D., Mahameruaji, J. N., & Anisa, R. (2019). Pengembangan konten positif sebagai bagian dari gerakan literasi digital. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 7(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v7i1.20575
Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020). Digital literacy: A review of literature. International Journal of Technoethics, 11(2), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.20200701.oa1
Rosana, D., & Sukardiyono. (2015). The items analysis and the identification of final test score inappropiateness to standardize the assesment. Jurnal Kependidikan, 45(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v45i2.7490
Saputri, H. A., Zulhijrah, Larasati, N. J., & Shaleh. (2023). Analisis Instrumen Assesmen : Validitas, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesukaran, dan Daya Beda Butir Soal. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 09(05), 2986–2995.
Setiyawan, R. A., & Wijayanti, P. S. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Selama Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika, 1(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v1i2.26
Suantari, N. M. D. P., Suma, K., & Pujani, N. M. (2018). Development of three tier static electricity diagnostic test to identify student conceptions about static electricity. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v4n5.285
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Trim Kom.
Suwanto, & Lestari, W. (2024). How to Assess Digital Literacy Skills of Elementary School Students? Eduscape: Journal of Education Insight, 2(1), 11–24.
Tika, P. N., Jariah, Y. A., Melina, M. M., Ristanto, R. H., & Isfaeni, H. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier Pada Pembelajaran Sistem Ekskresi Berdiferensiasi. Bio-Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.31849/bl.v10i2.14610
Tumanggor, A. M. R., Supahar, S., Ringo, E. S., & Harliadi, M. D. (2020). Detecting Students’ Misconception in Simple Harmonic Motion Concepts Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instruments. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.4571
Author Biographies
Nurhasanah, Universitas Jember
Moh. Badrus Sholeh Arif, Universitas Jember
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurhasanah, Zul Hidayatullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with Journal of Classroom Action Research, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Classroom Action Research.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
