Cognitive Conflict Integrated CRT Approach Analysis of Students' Conceptual Understanding Using E-Modules
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i12.10285Published:
2025-12-31Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyse students’ conceptual understanding and the needs for interactive teaching materials based on a cognitive conflict model integrated with a Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) approach. The research was conducted through a survey in three high schools in Padang City: SMAN 4, SMAN 9, and SMAN 11. A qualitative descriptive method was used, supported by a diagnostic test comprising 15 questions classified into four categories: conceptual understanding, lack of understanding, misconceptions, and not knowing the concept. The findings indicate that students’ average conceptual understanding remains below 50%. Significant misconceptions were identified in dynamics (41.82%), while high levels of conceptual ignorance were found in kinematics (51.91%). The needs analysis shows that teachers and students require interactive and culturally relevant materials to address these persistent misconceptions and support clearer conceptual construction. The results suggest that teaching materials incorporating cognitive conflict strategies can effectively challenge students’ initial ideas, while the CRT approach contextualises physics concepts within students’ cultural experiences. In conclusion, the development of interactive e-modules integrating cognitive conflict and CRT is needed to address conceptual difficulties and improve students’ understanding of fundamental physics concepts
Keywords:
Cognitive conflict Conceptual understanding Culturally responsive teaching MisconceptionsReferences
Adipan, A., Putra, B., & Rizki, D. (2024). Pengembangan e-modul untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 45-58.
Aini, E., Evendi, E., Halim, A., Syukri, M., & Yusrizal, Y. (2023). Relationship between Misconceptions and Students’ Scientific Literacy Abilities on Global Warming Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8051–8058. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5156
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bahtiar, B., Ibrahim, I., & Maimun, M. (2022). Profile of Student Problem Solving Skills Using Discovery Learning Model with Cognitive Conflict Approach. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1657
Capriconia, J., & Mufit, F. (2022). Analysis of Concept Understanding and Students’ Attitudes towards Learning Physics in Material of Straight Motion. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1381
Dhanil, M., & Mufit, F. (2024). How Virtual Reality Impacts Science Learning? A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(22). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i22.49989
Duit, R. (2007). Science education research internationally: Conceptions, research methods, domains of research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75369
Entino, R., Hariyono, E., & Lestari, N. A. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Atas pada materi Fisika. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.177-182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.177-182
Gay, G. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching: Ideas, actions, and effects. In Handbook of urban education (pp. 212-233). Routledge.
Gay, G. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching: Ideas, actions, and effects. In Handbook of urban education (pp. 212-233). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331435-16
Guerra-Reyes, F., Guerra-Dávila, E., Naranjo-Toro, M., Basantes-Andrade, A., & Guevara-Betancourt, S. (2024). Misconceptions in the learning of natural sciences: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(5), 497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050497
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hunaidah, H., Erniwati, E., & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2022). Tes Diagnostik Four-tier untuk Menilai Miskonsepsi Siswa tentang Fluida: Sebuah Kisah dari Pengembangan hingga Pengukuran dari Tiga Lokasi Lingkungan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1586–1592. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1784
Juliarti, E., Rahmawati, L., & Suryani, T. (2024). Pengaruh e-modul terhadap motivasi belajar peserta didik dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 10(2), 112-120.
Karagöl, İ. (2025). Culturally Responsive Teaching: A Bibliometric Investigation of Scholarly Trends. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (64), 2255-2277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1625031
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Buku Saku Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id
Ma, H., Yang, H., Li, C., Ma, S., & Li, G. (2025). The Effectiveness and Sustainability of Tier Diagnostic Technologies for Misconception Detection in Science Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 17(7), 3145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073145
Makhrus, M., & Hidayatullah, Z. (2021). The role of cognitive conflict approach to improving critical thinking skills and conceptual understanding in mechanical waves. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.8142
Mapulanga, T., & Jita, L. C. (2025). A Systematic Review of Studies Using the Topic-Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework in Science Education. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111417
Maria, H., & Paidi, P. (2024). Development of Interactive E-Module Integrated with Science, Environment, Technology, Society on Environmental Change Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 1220-1228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6877
Martha, C., Laksmisari, R., & Munfaridah, N. (2023). The Influence Of e-Module Based On Role-Playing Learning Model With Scientific Approach And Culturally Responsive Teaching To 10th Graders’Quantity And Measurement Conceptual Mastery. Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan, 9(2), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/ptk.v9i2.10917
Mufit, Fatni. 2018. “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Konflik Kognitif (PbKK) Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Dan Meremediasi Miskonsepsi.” fisika Mahapeserta didik. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/zqvrd
Mufit, F., & Fauzan, A. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Konflik Kognitif. CV IRDH. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/hm3ug
Mufit, F., Asrizal, A., & Puspitasari, R. (2020). Meta-Analysis of the effect of cognitive conflict on physics learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 267–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06213
Mufit, F., Asrizal, A., & Puspitasari, R. (2022). Cognitive conflict-based e-book with real experiment video analysis integration to enhance conceptual understanding of motion kinematics. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), 626-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39333
Mufit, F., Festiyed, Fauzan, A., & Lufri. (2023). The effect of cognitive Conflict Based Learning (CCBL) Model on remediation of misconceptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.003
Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., & Dhanil, M. (2023). Augmented reality dan virtual reality berbasis konflik kognitif,sebagai media pembelajaran abad ke-21 (Augmented reality and virtual reality based on cognitive conflict, as 21st century learning media). Rajawali Pers
Mufit, F., & Dhanil, M. (2024). Effectiveness of Augmented Reality with Cognitive Conflict Model to Improve Scientific Literacy of Static Fluid Material. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(9), 1199-1207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.9.2149
Muzakki, N. A., Diana, S., & Priyandoko, D. (2023). Efforts to Remediate Misconceptions in Cell Materials Using the Think Talk Write Learning Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 10641–10649. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.3470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.3470
Mvula, A. K. (2020). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance in Kinematical Motion: Graphical Interpretation and Conceptual Understanding. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.20448/801.51.69.103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/801.51.69.103
Pacaci, C., Ustun, U., & Ozdemir, O. F. (2024). Effectiveness of conceptual change strategies in science education: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(6), 1263-1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21887
Pratiwi, A. N., Erlina, E., Lestari, I., Masriani, M., & Rasmawan, R. (2023). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions Using a Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test on Colligative Properties of Solutions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10033–10042. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4018
Piaget, J. (2013). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009650
Rahmadayanti, D., & Hartoyo, A. (2022). Potret Kurikulum Merdeka, Wujud Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar. Research & Learning in Elementary Education, 6(4), 7174- 7187. doi:10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3431
Rahmawati, Y., & Ridwan, A. (2017). Empowering students’ chemistry learning: The integration of ethnochemistry in culturally responsive teaching. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 26(813-830). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995108
Rosadi, H. Y., & Andriyani, D. F. (2021). Tantangan menjadi guru BK dengan kurikulum merdeka belajar di masa pandemi COVID-19. Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) Klaster Humanoira.
Saputra, H., & Mustika, D. (2022). Analysis the Conceptual Understanding Level and Understanding Model of Pre-Service Physics Teacher. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2367–2372. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2246
Skelley, D. L., Stevens, M. L., & Bailey-Tarbett, L. K. (2022). Culturally Responsive Teaching in an Afterschool Literacy Program: Tutor Implementation and Experiences. School Community Journal, 32(1), 63-84.
Tanjung, Y. I., Festiyed, F., Diliarosta, S., Asrizal, A., Arsih, F., Fadillah, M. A., & Makrooni, G. (2025). Culturally Responsive Teaching in Science Education and its Relationship with Technopreneurship. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 7(2), 387-399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v7i2.563
Tarigan, S. (2013). Menginduksi Pemahaman Konsep Dengan Mempertimbangkan Pengetahuan Awal peserta didik Sebagai Salah Satu Model Pembelajaran IPA. UPI
Tomlinson, C. A. (2022). Everybody's classroom: differentiating for the shared and unique needs of diverse students. Teachers College Press.
Upayogi, I. N. T., & Juliawan, I. W. (2019). Reduksi miskonsepsi melalui pembelajaran berbasis virtual lab. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 4(2), 45-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v4i2.5611
Utami, A. W., & Khotimah, S. N. (2023). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions Using Six Tier Diagnostic Test with CRI (Certainty of Response Index) on Wave. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5205–5213. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4192
Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2007). The Culturally Responsive Teacher. In Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 29-50). New York: Teachers College Press.
Wilujeng, I., & Hidayatullah, Z. (2021). Alternative learning model in physics learning: Effect of the conceptual change model with cognitive conflict on critical thinking skill. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 111-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i2.5260
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yulianda, Fatni Mufit, Fuja Novitra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
