Constructivist Biology Learning Experiences Profile of Senior High School Students in South Sulawesi
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10343Published:
2025-02-28Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): FebruaryKeywords:
Biology, Constructivism, Learning experience, South Sulawesi, StudentResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to describe the constructivist Biology learning experience of high school students in South Sulawesi. The research subjects consisted of 525 students from 7 districts/cities in South Sulawesi. The method used in this study was a descriptive survey using a closed questionnaire instrument and a Likert scale. The data collection technique used a Google Forms platform that contained a questionnaire. The data obtained were processed using descriptive and inferential analyses. The results showed that the constructivist biology learning experience of students in South Sulawesi included learning personality indicators of 64.20%, reflection thinking of 68.89%, problem solving and investigation relevance to daily life of 69.55%, collaborative learning of 71.00%, discussion of 72.75%, teaching scaffolding of 68.29%. Then a very low correlation coefficient value is shown in the learning personality indicator with problem solving investigation of 0.15. The strong correlation coefficient value on the collaborative learning indicator with discussion is 0.60. The findings of this study indicate that the overall constructivist learning experience of students in South Sulawesi is still moderately low and the correlation coefficient between the dominant indicators is still weak. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve the constructivist Biology learning experience to optimize learning effectiveness.
References
Adak, S. (2017). Effectiveness of Constructivist Approach on Academic Achievement in Science at Secondary Level. Educational research and reviews, 12(22). https://doi.org/1074-1079.10.5897/ERR2017.3298
Adnan, A., Saenab S., Rahmatullah, R., Almunawarah, R., Sahira, S., & Aldi, S. (2024). Citizen Science Project Learning Model. Praya: P4I Publisher.
Adnan, A., Abhimanyu, S., Patta, B., & Arsyad, N. (2014). Enhance cognitive learning of junior high-school students through the implementation of constructivist models of learning biology based on ICT (ICT-Based MPBK). International Journal of Academic Research, 6(6), 55–62. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/viewFile/10639/10866
Adnan, A. (2014). ICT-based Constructivistic Biology Learning Model (ICT-based MPBK) for Junior High School Students. Journal of EST, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v1i1.1132
Adnan, A., Faisal, F., & Marliyah, S. (2012). Study of Motivation of Junior High School Students and Equivalent in Makassar City on Biological Science Subjects. Journal of Bionature, 13(2), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.35580/bionature.v13i2.1434
Adnan, A., Mulbar, U., Sugiarti, S., & Bahri, A. (2021). Scientific Literacy Skills of Students: Problem of Biology Teaching in Junior High School in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14349a
Ahmadi, G., Mohammadi, A., Asadzandi, S., Shah, M., & Mojtahedzadeh, R. (2023). What are the indicators of student engagement in learning management systems? a systematized review of the literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6453
Aldi, S., & Azis, A. A. (2024). The Influence of SaLDI Learning Model (Stimulation, Learning Community, Discovery, Inferring) on Activity, Motivation, and Learning Outcomes of Biology of High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(11), 9064-9077. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.9379
Aldi, S., Adnan, A., & Ismail, I. (2022). Biology Learning Profile with Electronic Student Worksheets Based on Science Process Skills. Journal of Biology Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v11i3.34520
Aldi, S., Adnan, A., & Hala, Y. (2023). Analisis Lesson Plan Guru Biologi SMA di Sulawesi Selatan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi: Inovasi Sains & Pembelajarannya, 11(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unm.ac.id/index.php/semnasbio/article/view/947
Almunawarah R., Adnan, & Bahri A. (2023). Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability on Senior High School Students in Biology Classroom Based on Modified FRISCO Indicators. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 12(10), 876-882. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR231002095937
Andersen, K. (2013). Discussion Technique: The Twice-Around. College Teaching, 61(2), 83-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2012.688175
Ashraf, M. A., & Sarfraz, M. (2016). Biology and evolution of life science. Saudi journal of biological sciences, 23(1), S1-S5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.11.012
Askell-Williams, H., & Lawson, M. J. (2005). Students' knowledge about the value of discussions for teaching and learning. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 83-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11218-004-5489-2.
Atler, K. (2015). An argument for a dynamic interrelated view of occupational experience. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.887991
Bächtold, M. (2013). What do students "construct" according to constructivism in science education? Research in science education, 43, 2477-2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9369-7
Bailey, P. D. (2008). Should "teacher centred teaching" replace "student centred learning"? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1039/b801308j
Bonner, J. T. (2015). Size and cycle: an essay on the structure of biology. Princeton University Press.
Caballé, S., Xhafa, F., & Abraham, A. (2008). Towards an automatic real-time assessment of online discussions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning practices. Third International Conference on Digital Information Management, 470-475. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746758
Choi, I., Wolf, M., Pooler, E., Sova, L., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2019). Investigating the Benefits of Scaffolding in Assessments of Young English Learners: A Case for Scaffolded Retell Tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1619180
Christensen, W. D., & Hooker, C. A. (2000). An interactivist-constructivist approach to intelligence: self-directed anticipative learning. Philosophical Psychology, 13(1), 5-45. https://doi.org /10.1080/09515080050002717
Dewi, T. M., & Iswandari, Y. (2016). The Implementation of Scaffolding in Writing Recount Texts in SMP Joannes Bosco Yogyakarta. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 19(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.24071/LLT.2016.190104
Dewi, M. R., & Arifin, Z. (2024). Analysis of 21st Century Skills in the Implementation of Project Based Learning in Biology Learning Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 2118–2128. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.5941
Djatsa, F. (2019). Threat perceptions, avoidance motivation and security behaviours correlations. Journal of Information Security, 11(01), 19. Retrieved from http://www.scirp.org/journal/Paperabs.aspx?PaperID=96987
Donovan, K., & Schmitt, E. (2014). Service learning in science education: a valuable and useful endeavor for biology majors. Bios, 85(3), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1893/0005-3155-85.3.167
Dörrenbächer, L., & Perels, F. (2016). Self-regulated learning profiles in college students Their relationship to achievement, personality, and the effectiveness of an intervention to foster self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2016.09.015.
Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2016). Online and other ICT-based Training Tools for Problem- olving Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5340
Fernandes, A., Pereira, L., Dias, Á., & Gupta, V. (2023). Strategic Problem-Solving: A State of the Art. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 51(3), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2023.3281520.
Fitria, D. (2021). Implementation of Constructivism Learning Theory in Science. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i3.71
Fuselier, L., Bougary, A., & Malott, M. (2011). From trace evidence to bioinformatics: Putting bryophytes into molecular biology education. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20458
Gibson, K. M. (2013). Fostering collaboration and learning in asynchronous online environments. The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 60-78. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/4030
Gitakarma, M. S., & Tjahyanti, L. P. A. S. (2012). Modification of Claroline with Constructivism-based Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Method. National Journal of Informatics Engineering Education: JANAPATI, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v1i1.9764
Gunn, H., Hunter, H., & Haas, B. (2012). Problem Based Learning in physiotherapy education: A practice perspective. Physiotherapy, 98(4), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2011.05.005
Guzzini, S. (2000). A reconstruction of constructivism in international relations. European journal of international relations, 6(2), 147-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002001.
Hadi, K. (2024). Psychology of Learning Theory (Behavioristic, Constructivist, Humanistic) in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(12), 920–929. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9605
Hajhosseini, M., Zandi, S., Shabanan, S. H., & Madani, Y. (2016). Critical thinking and social interaction in active learning: A conceptual analysis of class discussion from Iranian students' perspective. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1175051
Hamiyati, H., Pada, A. U. T., Safrida, S., Khairil, K., & Artika, W. (2022). Application of Case Method Model Based on Character Values in Reproductive System Materials to Improve Critical Thinking and Conation skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2387–2391. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2045
Handican, R., & Jamna, J. (2023). Thinking Trajectory of Students with Thinking and Feeling Personality Types in Solving Algebra Problems. Journal of Pedagogy and Learning, 6(1), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v6i1.53957
Haruthaithanasan, T. (2010). The effects of experiences with constructivist instruction on attitudes toward democracy among Thai college students. University of Missouri-Columbia.
Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I. A., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 355-363. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438
Haworth, R. (2016). Personal Learning Environments: A Solution for Self-Directed Learners. TechTrends, 60(1), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11528-016-0074-Z
Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.F3
Howard-Jones, P. A., & Jay, T. (2016). Rewards, learning and games. Current opinion in behavioural sciences, 10(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.015.
Ifenthaler, D., & Widanapathirana, C. (2014). Development and Validation of a Learning Analytics Framework: Two Case Studies Using Support Vector Machines. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4
Ikegami, T. (2009). Rehabilitating biology as a natural history. Adaptive Behaviour, 17(4), 325-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309340855
Jiang, L., & Elen, J. (2011). Instructional effectiveness of higher-order questions: The devil is in the detail of students' use of questions. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10984-011-9095-X
Juanda, A. (2022). Classroom Management: How Important is Authentic Assessment of 21st Century Skills in Biology Education Students? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1206
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in higher education, 38(5), 758-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kamila, K., Wilujeng, I., Jumadi, J., & Ungirwalu, S. Y. (2024). Analysis of Integrating Local Potential in Science Learning and its Effect on 21st Century Skills and Student Cultural Awareness: Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6485
Kyritsi, K. H., Zorkadis, V., Stavropoulos, E. C., & Verykios, V. (2019). The Pursuit of Patterns in Educational Data Mining as a Threat to Student Privacy. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5334/JIME.502
Lange, C., & Costley, J. (2020). Improving online video lectures: learning challenges created by media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00190-6
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical Research: Planning and Desig (12th ed.). Pearson
Liang, L. L., & Gabel, D. L. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143-1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069442
Listiana, L., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Suarsini, E. (2016). Empowering Students' Metacognitive Skills through New Teaching Strategy (Group Investigation Integrated with Think Talk Write) in Biology Classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.391
Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the mediating effect of learning approach between learning factors and higher order thinking skills in collaborative inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2475-2492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10025-4
Lundgren, B. (2017). Enspråkig undervisning i flerspråkig kontext. Educare, (1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2017.1.2
MacGillivray, H., & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (2011). Teaching Statistical Thinking Through Investigative Projects. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0#affiliations
Marlina, R., Miaz, Y., F, F., & Ardipal. (2025). The Influence of Project Based Learning LKPD in Improving 21st Century Skills for Class V Elementary School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 634–641. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.8972
McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner Support in Distance and Networked Learning Environments: Ten Dimensions for Successful Design. Distance Education, 23(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791022000009178
Morales-Mann, E., & Kaitell, C. (2001). Problem-based learning in a new Canadian curriculum. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2648.2001.01633.X
Muchtar, F., Nasrah, N., & Wahyuni, F. (2021). Implementation Of Blended Learning Model In Pandemic Era Covid- 19 In South Sulawesi Province. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progressive Education. https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.16-10-2020.2305208.
Muttaqiin, A. (2020). The Analysis of Students' Responses Toward the Computer-Based National Examination in Sciences Subject in West Pasaman Regency. Universe, 1(2), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.24036/universe.v1i2.21
Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 645-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8
Nurhidaya, N., Adnan, A., & Muis, A. (2023). Practicality test of HOTS-based worksheet on evolution topic for high school students. Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi, 6(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v6i1.1641
Nurpatri, Y., Muliani, D., & Indrawati, E. S. (2021). Implementation of constructivism approach in physics learning on students' critical thinking ability of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1), 012068. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012068
Pratama, L. D., Lestari, W., & Astutik, I. (2020). Effectiveness of using edutainment media amid the Covid-19 pandemic. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Programme, 9(2), 413-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i2.2783
Pollock, P., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2011). Learning Through Discussions: Comparing the Benefits of Small-Group and Large-Class Settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2011.539913
Rehiara, R. E., Kawatu, P. J., Rophi, A. H., Megawati, R., & Jesajas, D. R. (2024). The Relationship Between the Implementation of 4C with Biology Learning Outcomes and Soft Skills of High School Students in Jayapura City. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(12), 10188–10195. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9490
Ramdani, D., & Susilo, H. (2022). The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning on Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Metacognitive Skill Ability: A Meta-Analysis on Biological Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1607-1628. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1607
Rasmussen, J. (2001). The importance of communication in teaching: A systems-theory approach to the scaffolding metaphor. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110034369
Razavian, M., Tang, A., Capilla, R., & Lago, P. (2016). In two minds: How reflections influence software design thinking. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 28(6), 394-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1776
Roberts, J. (2016). The 'More Capable Peer': Approaches to Collaborative Learning in a Mixed-Ability Classroom. Changing English, 23, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2015.1133765.
Rodgers, C. (2006). Attending to Student Voice: The Impact of Descriptive Feedback on Learning and Teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2g), 209-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-873X.2006.00353.X
Roll, I., Baker, R. S. D., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014). On the benefits of seeking (and avoiding) help in online problem-solving environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 537-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883977
Schaefer, T., Fabian, C. M., & Kopp, T. (2020). The dynamics of online learning at the workplace: Peer-facilitated social learning and the application in practice. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 51(4), 1406–1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12894
Sikorav, J. L., Braslau, A., & Goldar, A. (2021). Foundations of biology. Symmetry, 13(9), 1701. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091701
Smith, M., Wood, W., Adams, W., Wieman, C., Knight, J., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions. Science, 323(5910), 122-124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165919
Soong, B. (2008). Learning through computers: Uncovering students' thought processes while solving physics problems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 592-610. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.1193
Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of students' biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622
Syamsiah, S. (2019). Flowchart and Pseudocode Design of Learning to Recognise Numbers with Animation for PAUD Rambutan Children. STRING (Unit of Research Writing and Technological Innovation), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/string.v4i1.3623
Taber, K. S. (2006). Beyond constructivism: The progressive research programme into learning science. Studies in Science Education, 42, 125-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260608560222
Tanta. (2024). Trend Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge to Improve Biology Teacher Competency in the 21st Century: A Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(12), 902–913. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9656
Thurmond, V. A. (2003). Defining Interaction and Strategies to Enhance Interactions in Web-Based Courses. Nurse Educator, 28(5), 237-241. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200309000-00013.
Tian, Q., & Zheng, X. (2023). Effectiveness of online collaborative problem-solving method on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 326-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12884.
Usman, M. H., Al Idrus, A., Doyan, A., Soeprianto, H., & Hakim, A. (2021). Teacher Basic Skills in Learning Science in Junior High Schools Facing the 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.652
Ustunel, H. H., & Tokel, S. (2018). Distributed Scaffolding: Synergy in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(1), 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9299-y
Vasile, C. (2011). Entry points, interests and attitudes. An integrative approach of learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 11(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2011.01.037
Werang, B. R., & Leba, S. M. R. (2022). Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. Qualitative Report, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165
Westberg, K. L., & Leppien, J. H. (2018). Student independent investigations for authentic learning. Gifted Child Today, 41(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517735354
Wieman, R. (2014). Using Data to Improve Instruction: Different Approaches for Different Goals. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5), 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2014.977755
Yuen, K. M., & Hau, K. T. (2006). Constructivist teaching and teacher-centred teaching: A comparison of students' learning in a university course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290600750861
Yusrizal, Y. (2016). Analysis of difficulty level of physics national examination's questions. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5803
Zhang, C., Fan, H., Xia, J., Guo, H., Jiang, X., & Yan, Y. (2017). The effects of reflective training on the disposition of critical thinking for nursing students in China: A controlled trial. Asian Nursing Research, 11(3), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2017.07.002.
Zheng, Y., Bao, H., Shen, J., & Zhai, X. (2020). Investigating Sequence Patterns of Collaborative Problem-Solving Behaviour in Online Collaborative Discussion Activity. Sustainability, 12(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208522
Author Biographies
Suhardi Aldi, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Adnan, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Andi Asmawati Azis, Universitas Negeri Makassar
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suhardi Aldi, Adnan, Andi Asmawati Azis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
