Improving the Quality of Learning Through the Integration of Literacy and Numeracy
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.10736Published:
2025-11-22Downloads
Abstract
Quality learning requires the systematic integration of literacy and numeracy as foundational competencies that support students’ critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and overall academic achievement. This literature review aims to identify the specific strategies used to integrate literacy and numeracy and evaluate their impact on critical thinking, conceptual understanding, and student engagement within the Indonesian education context. A narrative literature analysis was conducted by reviewing empirical studies, national education reports, and policy documents published between 2009-2023. Sources were screened based on their relevance to integration models, curriculum implementation, and measurable learning outcomes. The findings indicate that literacy–numeracy integration is most effective when implemented through contextual learning materials, project-based learning, and the Independent Curriculum, which collectively enhance students’ analytical thinking and comprehension of academic concepts. Evidence also shows that literacy-focused interventions and expanded access to learning resources increase motivation and engagement, although numeracy performance remains comparatively lower and requires stronger reinforcement. Overall, this review demonstrates that meaningful integration of literacy and numeracy contributes significantly to students’ readiness to engage with complex academic tasks. The study concludes that targeted integration strategies, supported by appropriate curriculum structures and equitable access to learning resources, are essential for improving learning quality across educational levels.
Keywords:
Education Integration Literacy Numeracy Quality of LearningReferences
Abdul Ghani, A. S., Abdul Rahim, A. F., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Hadie, S. N. H. (2022). Developing an interactive PBL environment via persuasive gamify elements: a scoping review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00193-z
Abubakar, T., I.., Y., Sani, R. A., Nasution, B., Yohandri, & Festiyed. (2024). Science Teachersâ€TM Understanding of Culturally Responsive Teaching on Independent Learning Curriculum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.4821
Amnuaylojaroen, T., & Parasin, N. (2023). Perspective on Particulate Matter: From Biomass Burning to the Health Crisis in Mainland Southeast Asia. Toxics, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11070553
Anugrahsari, I., B, N., B., N., & Syamsiah, S. (2025). The Influence of STEAM Integrated PjBL Learning Model on Communication Skills, Critical Thinking Skills and Problem-Solving Skills of Students in Biology Subject. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(6), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.11411
Aroonsrimarakot, S., Laiphrakpam, M., Chathiphot, P., Saengsai, P., & Prasri, S. (2023). Online learning challenges in Thailand and strategies to overcome the challenges from the students’ perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8153–8170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11530-6
Barnett, L. M., Jerebine, A., Keegan, R., Watson-Mackie, K., Arundell, L., Ridgers, N. D., Salmon, J., & Dudley, D. (2023). Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of Physical Literacy Assessments Designed for School Children: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 53(10), 1905–1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01867-4
Cano, F., García, Á., Justicia, F., & García, A. B. B. (2014). Enfoques de aprendizaje y comprensión lectora: El papel de las preguntas de los estudiantes y del conocimiento previo. Revista de Psicodidactica, 19(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.10186
Catalán Molina, D., Porter, T., Oberle, C., Haghighat, M., Fredericks, A., Budd, K., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2022). How to Measure Quality of Delivery: Focus on Teaching Practices That Help Students to Develop Proximal Outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 15(4), 898–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2054481
Cavanaugh, K., Wallston, K. A., Gebretsadik, T., Shintani, A., Huizinga, M. M., Davis, D., & Rothman, R. L. (2009). Addressing literacy and numeracy to improve diabetes care: Two randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care, 32(12), 2149–2155. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0563
Chittleborough, C. R., Mittinty, M. N., Lawlor, D. A., & Lynch, J. W. (2014). Effects of Simulated Interventions to Improve School Entry Academic Skills on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Educational Achievement. Child Development, 85(6), 2247–2262. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12309
Cowan, R., & Powell, D. (2014). The contributions of domain-general and numerical factors to third-grade arithmetic skills and mathematical learning disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034097
Dietrichson, J., Filges, T., Klokker, R. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., Bøg, M., & Jensen, U. H. (2020). Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with, or at risk of, academic difficulties in Grades 7–12: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1081
Farrell, L., Eadie, T., McLean Davies, L., & Sandiford, C. (2022). Literacy education for citizenship across the lifespan. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00014-2
Fitrianingrum, S., & Murtiyasa, B. (2023). The Private Student’s Junior High School and Their Numeracy Literacy Competency. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7645–7650. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4640
Flannery, D., Gilleece, L., & Clavel, J. G. (2023). School socio-economic context and student achievement in Ireland: an unconditional quantile regression analysis using PISA 2018 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00171-x
Gaspard, H., Parrisius, C., Piesch, H., Kleinhansl, M., Wille, E., Nagengast, B., & Hulleman, C. S. (2021). The Potential of Relevance Interventions for Scaling Up: A Cluster-Randomized Trial Testing the Effectiveness of a Relevance Intervention in Math Classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1507–1528. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000663
Gillis, S., Polesel, J., & Wu, M. (2016). PISA Data: Raising concerns with its use in policy settings. The Australian Educational Researcher, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0183-2
Gillon, G., McNeill, B., Scott, A., Denston, A., Wilson, L., Carson, K., & Macfarlane, A. H. (2019). A better start to literacy learning: findings from a teacher-implemented intervention in children’s first year at school. Reading and Writing, 32(8), 1989–2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9933-7
Gilmore, C., Clayton, S., Cragg, L., McKeaveney, C., Simms, V., & Johnson, S. (2018). Understanding arithmetic concepts: The role of domain-specific and domain-general skills. PLoS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201724
Gracy, D., Fabian, A., Basch, C. H., Scigliano, M., MacLean, S. A., MacKenzie, R. K., & Redlener, I. E. (2018). Missed opportunities: Do states require screening of children for health conditions that interfere with learning? PLoS ONE, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190254
Griffey, R. T., Melson, A. T., Lin, M. J., Carpenter, C. R., Goodman, M. S., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2014). Does numeracy correlate with measures of health literacy in the emergency department? Academic Emergency Medicine, 21(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12310
Grotlüschen, A., Desjardins, R., & Liu, H. (2020). Literacy and numeracy: Global and comparative perspectives. International Review of Education, 66, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09854-x
Gutiérrez-Fresneda, R. (2018). Longitudinal Study on the Development of Literacy Skills During Literacy. Revista de Psicodidactica, 23(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2017.09.002
Handayani, N. A., Rosana, D., Wilujeng, I., Sari, M. I. P., Nofianti, E., Az-Zahro, S. F., & Ramadhanti, D. (2022). ICT Literacy Analysis of Junior High School Students Through Environmental Learning on Green Consumerism Using Padlet. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1254
Hanemann, U., & McKay, V. (2015). Lifelong literacy: Towards a new agenda. International Review of Education, 61, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9497-6
Högberg, B. (2023). Is There a trade-off Between Achievement and Wellbeing in Education Systems? New cross-country Evidence. Child Indicators Research, 16(5), 2165–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10047-9
Horiguchi, T., Tomoto, T., & Hirashima, T. (2015). A framework of generating explanation for conceptual understanding based on “semantics of constraints. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41039-015-0002-4
Hudson, B. (2019). Epistemic quality for equitable access to quality education in school mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1618917
Huzaimah, A., Abdillah, M., Laila, N. Q., Tamudin, M., & Puji Astuti, T. M. (2023). Disregarding the Reproductive Rights of Women in Child Marriage in Indonesia. Samarah, 7(2), 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.17392
Ibrahim, A. I., Sulaiman, N., & Ali, I. (2022). Simultaneous multidimensional impacts of active learning revealed in a first implementation in the MENA region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(47). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas
Ilmi, M. B., Wahyuningsih, U., & Crosita, O. Y. (2023). Determinants of fruit consumption in adult women in Indonesia. Europe PMC. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133136.1
Inthaphatha, S., Isin-Xiong, L., Louangpradith, V., Xiong, V., Xaitengcha, V., Phengsavanh, A., & Yamamoto, E. (2023). Period shaming behavior among male students in Luang Prabang Province, Lao People’s Democratic Republic: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 18(7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288145
Jamali, S. M., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Jamali, F. (2023). The role of STEM Education in improving the quality of education: a bibliometric study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(3), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09762-1
Jeffcoat, J., & Tang, H. (2025). Empowering Sixth-Grade Students’ Digital Literacy Through Teacher-Librarian Collaborative Teaching: A Mixed Methods Study. Tech Know Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09916-9
Kaddor, C., & Steinbüchel, A. (2011). Implications of various phosphoenolpyruvatecarbohydrate phosphotransferase system mutations on glycerol utilization and poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) accumulation in ralstonia eutropha H16. AMB Express, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-1-16
Khairani, N., Elfitra, E., & Siregar, T. M. (2025). Building an E-Learning System Calculating Pension Funds Using the Cox Ingersoll Ross Interest Rate Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 742–751. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10198
Kim, J. S., Capotosto, L., Hartry, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2011). Can a Mixed-Method Literacy Intervention Improve the Reading Achievement of Low-Performing Elementary School Students in an After-School Program?: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial of READ 180 Enterprise. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711399148
Klarare, A., Rydeman, I. B., Kneck, B. S., E., W., E., & Bisholt, B. (2022). Methods and strategies to promote academic literacies in health professions: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03288-9
Kovas, Y., Voronin, I., Kaydalov, A., Malykh, S. B., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2013). Literacy and Numeracy Are More Heritable Than Intelligence in Primary School. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2048–2056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486982
Kurnia, A. B., Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2024). The development of high school students’ statistical literacy across grade level. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(Suppl 1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00449-x
Kurnia, M. P. A., Waris, & Gita, R. S. D. (2025). STEM-Based Learning Using Assemblr Edu to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills; A Case Study in Elementary School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(7), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11301
Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., Jorge, L. R., Kollmann, J., & Weisser, W. W. (2015). Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals. Ambio, 44(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0539-2
Lopez-Pedersen, A., Mononen, R., Aunio, P., Scherer, R., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2023). Improving Numeracy Skills in First Graders with Low Performance in Early Numeracy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Remedial and Special Education, 44(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221102537
López-Pimentel, J. C., Medina-Santiago, A., Alcaraz-Rivera, M., & Del-Valle-soto, C. (2021). Sustainable project-based learning methodology adaptable to technological advances for web programming. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158482
Ma, X., Zeng, D., Wang, J., Xu, K., & Li, L. (2022). Effectiveness of bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary teaching strategy in Chinese medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.975229
MacDonald, E., Arpin, E., & Quesnel-Vallée, A. (2022). Literacy and self-rated health: Analysis of the Longitudinal and International Study of Adults (LISA. SSM - Population Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101038
Manu, A., Ewerling, F., Barros, A. J. D., & Victora, C. G. (2019). Association between availability of children’s book and the literacy-numeracy skills of children aged 36 to 59 months: Secondary analysis of the UNICEF Multiple-Indicator Cluster Surveys covering 35 countries. Journal of Global Health, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.010403
Maritasari, D. B., Aswasulasikin, L., & A. (2025). Development of Tests Based on Proprofs Digital Media to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of Students in Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9383
Martiniuk, A., Colbran, R., Ramsden, R., Karlson, D., O’callaghan, E., Lowe, E., & Wotherspoon, A. (2019). Hypothesis: Improving literacy about health workforce will improve rural health workforce recruitment, retention and capability. Human Resources for Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0442-9
Menzies, H. M., Mahdavi, J. N., & Lewis, J. L. (2008). Early intervention in reading: From research to practice. Remedial and Special Education, 29(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508315844
Mirna, A., K., & Palloan, P. (2025). The Influence of Problem Based Learning Model and Learning Interest on Physics Problem Solving Ability of Grade XI High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.913
Mononen, R., & Niemivirta, M. (2023). Patterns of symbolic numerical magnitude processing and working memory as predictors of early mathematics performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(1), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00596-4
Morgan, N., & Jones, M. A. (2025). Student Perceptions on the Use of Journal Clubs for Enhancing Academic Literacy. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874251388982
Nag, S., Snowling, M. J., & Asfaha, Y. M. (2016). Classroom literacy practices in low- and middle-income countries: an interpretative synthesis of ethnographic studies. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1135115
Neugebauer, P., & Prediger, S. (2023). Quality of Teaching Practices for All Students: Multilevel Analysis of Language-Responsive Teaching for Robust Understanding. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 811–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10274-6
Nguyen, A. (2023). Unraveling EMI as a predictor of English proficiency in Vietnamese higher education: Exploring learners’ backgrounds as a variable. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38278
Nussbaum, E. M., Dove, I. J., & Putney, L. A. G. (2023). Bridging dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory through critical questions. Dialogic Pedagogy, 11(3), 7– 25. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.548
Oldfather, P., & Dahl, K. (1994). Toward A Social Constructivist Reconceptualization Of Intrinsic Motivation For Literacy Learning. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969409547843
Paramita, W., & Fitria, Y. (2025). The Influence of PjBL-Based STEAM Approach on Students’ High Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(8), 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.11824
Pensiero, N., & Green, A. (2018). The effects of post-compulsory education and training systems on literacy and numeracy skills: A comparative analysis using PISA 2000 and the 2011 survey of adult skills. European Journal of Education, 53(2), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12268
Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Janssen, E. M., & Gog, T. (2021). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial? Instructional Science, 49(6), 747–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0
Reder, S., Gauly, B., & Lechner, C. (2020). Practice makes perfect: Practice engagement theory and the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency. International Review of Education, 66(2–3), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09830-5
Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774253
Saba Villarroel, P. M., Gumpangseth, N., Songhong, T., Yainoy, S., Monteil, A., Leaungwutiwong, P., & Wichit, S. (2023). Emerging and re-emerging zoonotic viral diseases in Southeast Asia: One Health challenge. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1141483
Sakamoto, M., Yamaguchi, E., Yamamoto, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2021). An intervention study on students’ decision-making towards consensus building on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1965–1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1947541
Sakerani, S., Iskandar, A. A., Ismaya, B., & Rahmah, S. (2025). The Role of Teachers as Motivators and Facilitators in Strengthening Numeracy Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(9), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i9.12069
Schmid, R., Pauli, C., & Petko, D. (2023). Examining the use of digital technology in schools with a school-wide approach to personalized learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10167-z
Severiens, S. E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Academic and social integration and study progress in problem based learning. Higher Education, 58(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9181-x
Siebecke, D. E., & Jarl, M. (2022). Does the material well-being at schools successfully compensate for socioeconomic disadvantages? Analysis of resilient schools in Sweden. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00130-y
Siregar, T. M., Armanto, D., Frisnoiry, S., & Ruslan, D. (2025). Effective Solutions for Implementing Android-Based Computer-Based Testing (CBT) In Vocational High Schools as A Digital Assessment Innovation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.10155
Tanjung, Y. I., Festiyed, F., Diliarosta, S., Asrizal, A., Arsih, F., Fadillah, M. A., & Makrooni, G. (2025). Culturally Responsive Teaching in Science Education and its Relationship with Technopreneurship. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship, 7(2), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v7i2.563
Tanjung, Y. I., Festiyed, S. D., Asrizal, F. A., & Fadillah, M. A. (2025). Developing the Physics Learning Management System (PLMS) to Support Blended Learning Models. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(1), 18–29,. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.1.2214
Tanjung, Y. I. T., Festiyed, F., Diliarosta, S. D., Jubaidah, J., & Sanjaya, A. P. S. (2024). Analysis of students’ problem solving skills based on Heller indicator. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.04.40
Tanjung, Y. I., Wulandari, T., Festiyed, F., Yerimadesi, Y., & Ahda, Y. (2023). Development analysis of creative thinking test instruments on natural science materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v12i1.43340
Tawafak, R. M., Al-Obaydi, L. H., Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). Technology integration of using digital gameplay for enhancing EFL college students’ behavior intention. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13454
Ten Cate, O., Snell, L., Mann, K., & Vermunt, J. (2004). Orienting Teaching Toward the Learning Process. Academic Medicine, 79(3), 219–228. Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/abstract/2004/03000/orienting_teaching_toward_the_learning_process.5.aspx
Usher, D. C., Driscoll, T. A., Dhurjati, P., Pelesko, J. A., Rossi, L. F., Schleiniger, G., & White, H. B. (2010). Essay A Transformative Model for Undergraduate Quantitative Biology Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10
Wong, J. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2023). Leveraging learning experience design: digital media approaches to influence motivational traits that support student learning behaviors in undergraduate online courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(3), 595–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09342-1
Wortha, S. M., Klein, E., Lambert, K., Dackermann, T., & Moeller, K. (2023). The relevance of basic numerical skills for fraction processing: Evidence from cross-sectional data. PLoSOne, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281241
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tiur Malasari Siregar, Muliawan Firdaus, Trisnawati Hutagalung, Irham Ramadhani, Suci Frisnoiry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
