Development of Jono Oge ‘Walking House’ Liquefaction Media for Science Learning and Mitigation
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.10806Published:
2025-08-31Downloads
Abstract
When an earthquake occurs, there is a strange phenomenon, namely the liquefaction of large areas of land. The liquefaction of the soil caused the houses to sink into the ground along with the casualties. In addition, there were also houses that shifted hundreds of metres from their initial position because the foundation soil was liquid and was on a slope so that it was like a ‘walking house’ After this phenomenon occurred and the peak of the earthquake had ended, the soil under the foundation of the house that shifted gradually solidified again as before. In science, this phenomenon is called liquefaction. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which the soil loses much of its strength and stiffness in a short period of time. The soil contracts at the onset of cyclic loading due to earthquake shaking, so that the pore water pressure increases to near or beyond its normal stress. In order for a stable building to stand on the ground, the soil layer must be safe from liquefaction hazards. Seeing the above phenomena and problems, as a researcher in the field of education, it is appropriate to conduct research in the form of developing props for the phenomenon of ‘walking houses’ during liquefaction for science learning. The development research that will be carried out has a problem formulation, namely how to develop teaching aids for the ‘walking house’ phenomenon. The purpose of the research is to develop props for the phenomenon of ‘walking houses’ during liquefaction for science learning. As well as providing an understanding that the phenomenon of walking houses and trees is a natural scientific event that can occur in liquefied areas. This development research uses the 4D model. The 4D model used has several stages, defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. The results of the research on the development of props for the walking house phenomenon can provide a complete scientific understanding of how the house can walk or move when liquefaction occurs while some other houses collapse and sink. The results of this research can also be used for disaster learning so as to provide in-depth knowledge for all students so that in the event of a disaster they are expected to take appropriate and accurate action which in turn can reduce the number of casualties. Based on the normal gains of the application of the ‘walking house’ props for science learning and mitigation at SMPN1 Sigi 0.31 SMPN 13 by 0.33 Sigi SMPN 27 Petobo by 0.19 and SMPN 21 Petobo by 0.32 Petobo said the ‘walking house’ props are effective for science learning and mitigatio
Keywords:
Earthquake Jono oge Liquefaction Learning MediaReferences
Montoya, B. M., & Mesri, G. (2021). Liquefaction behavior of granular soils. Geotechnical Journal, 58(3), 112–130.
Dashti, S., Bray, J. D., & Pyle, M. (2019). Effects of liquefaction on urban infrastructure. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 89, 67–82.
Prasetyo, H., Wijaya, A. R., & Kusumawardani, M. (2020). Post-earthquake liquefaction in Palu: Causes and mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards, 102(1), 215–229.
Youd, T. L., & Idriss, I. M. (2018). Liquefaction-induced ground failure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(5), 04018024.
Cahyono, B. E., Setiawan, R., & Lestari, A. (2022). Disaster education through experimental learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(2), 95–108.
Kolb, D. A., & Kolb, A. Y. (2017). Experiential learning in science education. Educational Research Review, 24, 1–12.
Aydan, O. (2019). Liquefaction and its mitigation techniques. Geotechnical Engineering Journal, 56(2), 89–102.
Ishihara, K. (2020). Soil liquefaction and its impact on urban areas. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 12(4), 201–223.
Towhata, I. (2019). Earthquake geotechnical engineering. Springer Nature, 302–320.
Sitharam, T. G., & Jakka, R. (2021). Liquefaction hazard assessment for seismic regions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 50(7), 1005–1020.
Hicks, M. A., Wang, L., & Lee, C. (2020). Geo-hazard education using experimental simulations. Advances in Engineering Education, 34(1), 77–95.
Mills, C., & Treagust, D. (2018). Visualization in geoscience education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(4), 321–338.
Widodo, S., Prasetyo, H., & Yuniarti, A. (2021). Indigenous knowledge in disaster education. Asian Journal of Disaster Prevention, 10(1), 55–70.
Tatsuoka, F., Suzuki, Y., & Yoshimoto, N. (2019). Ground improvement techniques for liquefiable soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37(4), 1125–1143.
Robertson, P. K., & Wride, C. E. (2020). Seismic response of saturated sands. Earthquake Spectra, 36(2), 289–312.
Kramer, S. L. (2019). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, 280–300.
Rahardjo, H., Leong, E. C., & Satyanaga, A. (2021). Liquefaction susceptibility in tropical soils. Engineering Geology, 303, 105–123.
Kayen, R. E., Thompson, E. M., & Seed, R. B. (2020). Advances in liquefaction analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(5), 245–267.
Cetin, K. O., Seed, R. B., & Bray, J. D. (2018). Evaluating liquefaction hazard. Geotechnical Engineering Journal, 45(3), 301–315.
Xue, Q., & Zhang, L. (2021). Post-earthquake reconstruction in liquefied areas. Disaster Management Journal, 15(3), 122–137.
Ariyanti, D., et al. (2021). Implementation of experiment-based learning media in liquefaction mitigation. Journal of Science Research and Education, 7(3), 187–195.
Hidayat, R., et al. (2020). The effect of interactive media on understanding the concept of liquefaction. JPPIPA, 6(2), 129–136.
Ramdani, M. A., et al. (2021). Liquefaction experiment model for science learning. JPPIPA, 8(1), 99–110.
Nurhayati, R., et al. (2019). STEAM approach in liquefaction mitigation in schools. JPPIPA, 5(4), 211–220.
Sari, A., & Mulyadi, R. (2022). Digital simulation for learning about liquefaction in secondary schools. JPPIPA, 9(2), 143–156.
Fauzan, A., et al. (2022). Development of miniature model of liquefaction for geological education. JPPIPA, 10(1), 88–97.
Lestari, P., & Nugroho, S. (2021). Saturated sand demonstration for liquefaction learning. JPPIPA, 8(2), 177–189.
Okpatrioka. (2023). Innovative research and development (R&D;) in education. Journal Education, Language and Culture, 1(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.47861/jdan.v1i1.154
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Minneapolis, MN: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota.
Arywiantari, A. A. A., & Tastra, I. D. K. (2015). Development of interactive multimedia 4D model in science learning at SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v3i1.5611
Agustina, R., & Vahlia, I. (2016). Development of problem-based teaching materials for economic mathematics course in mathematics education study program. Jurnal Aksioma, 5(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v5i2.668
Johan, J. R., Iriani, T., & Maulana, A. (2023). Application of the Four-D model in the development of video media for small group and individual teaching skills. Jurnal Pendidikan West Science, 1(6), 372–378.
Saputra, N. W., Wibawa, A. P., Pujianto, U., & Anugrah, P. (2020). Development of data mining teaching materials using the Four-D model in the CDIO framework. Jurnal Belantika Pendidikan, 3(2), 48–58.
Waruwu, et al. (2024). Research and development (R&D;) methods: Concept, types, stages and advantages. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(2), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2141
Suprapto, E., Apriandi, D., & Pamungkas, I. P. (2019). Development of animation-based interactive e-book for vocational high school students. Anargya Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.24176/.v2i2
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Wahyono, U. (2020). Development of earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction props for learning in Palu City middle school. Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v5i1.23420
Arikunto, S. (1999). Research procedures: A practical approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ayub, S., et al. (2020). Analysis of disaster preparedness among students and teachers at State Elementary School 6 Mataram. Orbita Jurnal Hasil Kajian, Inovasi, dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i1.1944
Maharani, S., et al. (2024). Disaster mitigation education and children's preparedness for earthquake at SDN 09 Berok Nipah. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 8(2), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.33757/jik.v8i2.1207
Maharani, N. (2024). Analysis of children's earthquake knowledge and disaster mitigation in Banjar Mandala Sari Dauh Puri Kelod Bali. Pendipa Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.1.78-87
Prihatiningsih, N. L. (2020). Development of 3D mockups as learning media for liquefaction in natural disaster mitigation materials for class XI social studies SMA 3 Mojokerto City. Swara Bhumi Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 1(1), 1–11.
Prasetya, S. P., Daryono, & Budiyanto, E. (2017). Media development effectiveness of geography 3D mockups. Journal of Physics, 953, 012172. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012172
Saifuddin, et al. (2023). Educational teaching aids related to earthquake mitigation at SDN Candimulyo 1 Madiun. Sewagati Journal of Community Service, 7(4), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.12962/j26139960.v7i4.541
Wahyono, U., Kade, A., & Untara, K. A. A. (2022). The implementation of local context modules as an effort for disaster risk reduction (An empirical study in disaster-affected schools). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3
Saehana, S., & Wahyono, U. (2018, February). Analysis of students' understanding on solar eclipse concept. In First Indonesian Communication Forum of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Leaders. International Conference on Education 2017 (ICE 2017) (pp. 161–165). Atlantis Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Unggul Wahyono, Ketut Alit Adi Untara, Marungkil Pasaribu, Moh Syarif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
