The Influence of Learning Models and Formative Tests on Students Science Learning Outcomes
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.10835Published:
2025-05-31Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 5 (2025): MayKeywords:
Formative Tests, Probing Prompting, Problem-Based Learning, Science Learning OutcomeResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Science learning requires learning that is not only centered on the teacher (teacher centered), but must also be centered on students (student centered) (Zulfikar: 2021). This study is a type of true experimental research that aims to determine the effect of learning models and formative tests on the science learning outcomes of students of class VIII of SMPN 3 Majene. The independent variables in this research are the probing prompting and problem-based learning models. The moderator variables are objective and subjective formative tests, while the dependent variable is the learning outcome. The population is all students in class VIII of SMPN 3 Majene at the eight classes. The sample for this research consisted of four classes. The four sample classes are experimental classes with 120 students. Data collection was carried out using science learning outcomes tests. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential analyses, especially two-way ANOVA analyses. The results of inferential analysis on the hypothesis show that there is influence between the learning model and formative tests on students science learning outcomes
References
Ali, M. S., Khaeruddin, & Palloan, P. (2021). Efektivitas Umpan Balik Tes Formatif dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Penguasaan Materi Metodologi Penelitian (Eksperimen Di S-1 Pendidikan Fisika FMIPA UNM Makassar). Jurnal Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian “Penguatan Riset, Inovasi, Dan Kreativitas Peneliti Di Era Pandemi Covid-19”: Universitas Negeri Makassar Dan Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, 6. Retrieved from https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnaslemlit/article/view/25406
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dassar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment.. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Diasputri, A., Sri Nurhayati, & Warlan Sugiyo. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Berbantuan Lembar Kerja Berstruktur Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v6i2.6537
Hamalik, O. (2019). Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Huda, M. (2015). Model – Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Kurniasi, I., & Sani, B. (2015). Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Untuk Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru. Kata Pena.
Lin, S.-Y., & Singh, C. (2013). Using an isomorphic problem pair to learn introductory physics: Transferring from a two-step problem to a three-step problem. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020114
Magdalena, I., Aqmarani, A., Nurhalisa, N., & Syahra, N. P. (2023). Perbandingan Penggunaan Tes Objektif dan Tes Subjektif terhadap Hasil Belajar. YASIN, 3(4), 710–720. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v3i4.1316
Mendrofa, D., Desman Telaumbanua, Novelina Andriani Zega, & Agnes Renostini Harefa. (2024). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Hiliserangkai Tahun Pelajaran 2023/2024. . Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 7(2). Retrieved from https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/jrpp/article/view/28116/
Nadeak, L. N., Sianipar, H. H., & Siahaan, A. L. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Promting Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI AKL SMKN 1 Pematang Siantar T.A. 2022/2023. Pengembangan Penelitian Pengabdian Jurnal Indonesia (P3JI), 1(2), 140–150.
Ngalimun, Fauzani, Muh., & Salabi, A. (2016). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Aswaja Pressindo.
Novena, V. V., & Kriswandani. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy. . Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan (Scholaria) Univeritas Kristen Satya Wacana, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i2.p189-196
Nurmahasih, U., & Jumadi, J. (2023). Effect of Utilizing the PBL Model in Physics Learning on Student Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2741
Purwanto. (2013). Penggunaan Bentuk Tes Formatif Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mata Kuliah Evaluasi Pendidikan Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Berpikir. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i2.12722
Rapi, N. K. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Dan Jenis Penilaian Formatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa SMPN. Cakrawala Pendidikan , 1, 69–79. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/semnasmipa/article/view/10513
Retnawati, H. (2016). Ananlisis Kuantitatif Instrument Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
Riadi, E. (2016). Statistika Penelitian (Analisis Manual dan IBM SPSS). Andi.
Rostiana, I., & Nana. (2022). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Kemampuan Konsep Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika , 2031–7651.
Shoimin, A. (2020). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. ArRuzz Media.
Siregar, S. (2014). Statistika Deskriptif untuk Penelitian. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Theriana, A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Nurul Amal. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa. Universitas PGRI Palembang, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.33557/binabahasa.v13i01.963
Yulianti, E. (2019). Model Problem Based Learning (PBL): Efekenya Terhadap Pemhaman Konsep dan Berfikir Kritis. Indonesian Journal of Scence Education, 2(3), 399–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v2i3.4366
Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of Self-Regulatory Influences on Writing Course Attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845
Zulfikar. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Berbasis Active Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Pada Siswa Kelas X MIA SMA Negeri 1 Palu. Gamaproionukleus, 2(1), 16–23.
Zuriyanti, H. (2022). Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Probing-Prompting Pada Materi Sistem Gerak Kelas XI IPA. Cahaya Pendidikan, 8(1), 12–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.33373/chypend.v8i1.3938
Author Biographies
Misbah, Universitas Negeri Makassar
M. Sidin Ali, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Muhammad Arsyad, Universitas Negeri Makassar
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Misbah, M. Sidin Ali, Muhammad Arsyad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
