Central Sulawesi Grand Forest Park: “Participatory Mapping Model for Conflict Resolution on Forest Resource Utilization”
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.11157Published:
2025-06-25Downloads
Abstract
Land claims and forest resource utilization activities are one of the causes of conflict in forest management in the Grand Forest Park (Tahura) area of Central Sulawesi. The existence of communities around and within the Central Sulawesi Grand Forest Park is an inseparable part of forest ecosystem management. The success of management planning for it will be more achieved if the manager has reliable instruments and strategies in dealing with problems and conflicts between forest managers and the community. The aim of the research is to classify the roles of the parties in the utilization of forest resources in Tahura and to design a participatory mapping model for conflict resolution over the use of forest resources in Tahura. The research method used in this research is a matrix of interrelationships between stakeholder issues to determine conflict issues on a priority scale, stakeholder analysis to map the influence and interests of stakeholders and to determine a participatory conflict resolution mapping model using a soft system method. Focusing on conflict issues that are on the priority scale, namely land (tenurial) conflicts and conflicts over the value of the benefits of the existence of Tahura. The results of stakeholder mapping related to land conflict resolution consist of: key actors (key players) including: Central Sulawesi Forestry Service, UPTD Tahura, Village Communities, and Forest Farmer Groups. Meanwhile, the resolution model formulated is "Joint control" based on the role of each stakeholder, namely the Management body or Advisor Body.
Keywords:
Central Sulawesi, Conflict resolution model, Participatory MappingReferences
Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021). Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment. World Development, 138, 105223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223
Almanza-Alcalde, H., Satyal, P., Corbera, E., SotoSánchez, A. P., & Pskowski, M. (2022). Participatory injustice in Mexico’s Readiness process to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD +). Human Ecology, 50(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-021-00280-7
Alusiola, R. A., Froese, R., Schilling, J., & Klär, P. (2025). Identifying peace pathways: How can forest conservation contribute to environmental peacebuilding? Climate and Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2025.2505538
Arifah, Salman, D., Yassi, A., & Bahsar Demmallino, E. (2023). Knowledge flow analysis of knowledge co-production-based climate change adaptation for lowland rice farmers in Bulukumba Regency, Indonesia. Regional Sustainability, 4(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2023.05.005
Batunacun, Wieland, R., Lakes, T., Yunfeng, H., & Nendel, C. (2019). Identifying drivers of land degradation in Xilingol, China, between 1975 and 2015. Land Use Policy, 83, 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.013
Bos, A. B., De Sy, V., Duchelle, A. E., Atmadja, S., De Bruin, S., Wunder, S., & Herold, M. (2020). Integrated assessment of deforestation drivers and their alignment with subnational climate change mitigation efforts. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.002
Cai, M., Liu, P., & Wang, H. (2020). Political trust, risk preferences, and policy support: A study of land-dispossessed villagers in China. World Development, 125, 104687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104687
Clark, J. K. (2021). Public Values and Public Participation: A Case of Collaborative Governance of a Planning Process. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020956397
Doucet, T. C., Duinker, P. N., Zurba, M., Steenberg, J. W. N., & Charles, J. D. (2024). Perspectives of successes and challenges in collaborations between non-governmental organization and local government on urban forest management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 93, 128220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128220
Fienitz, M., & Siebert, R. (2022). “It Is a Total Drama”: Land Use Conflicts in Local Land Use Actors’ Experience. Land, 11(5), 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050602
Ghorbani, M., & Azadi, H. (2021). A Social-Relational Approach for Analyzing Trust and Collaboration Networks as Preconditions for Rangeland Comanagement. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 75, 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.10.008
Golar, G., Basir-Cyio, M., Isrun, I., Bakri, R., Rusydi, M., Bohari, B., & Pratama, M. F. (2021). Recovery of Agricultural Areas Affected by Traditional Gold Mining: Sustainable Food Supply Stability. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 16(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.160207
Golar, G., Malik, A., Muis, H., Herman, A., Nurudin, N., & Lukman, L. (2020). The social-economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for potential forest degradation. Heliyon, 6(10), e05354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05354
Golar, G., Muis, H., Baharuddin, R. F., & Simorangkir, W. S. (2023). The perspective of multi-parties to the implementation of Forestry and Other Land Use (FoLU) net sink in Central Sulawesi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1253(1), 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1253/1/012098
Greenslade, C., Murphy, R., Morse, S., & Griffiths, G. H. (2020). Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Factors Limiting Woodland Management and Sustainable Local Wood Product Use in the South East of England. Sustainability, 12(23), 10071. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310071
Gritten, D., Mola-Yudego, B., Delgado-Matas, C., & Kortelainen, J. (2013). A quantitative review of the representation of forest conflicts across the world: Resource periphery and emerging patterns. Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.008
Hak, S., McAndrew, J., & Neef, A. (2018). Impact of Government Policies and Corporate Land Grabs on Indigenous People’s Access to Common Lands and Livelihood Resilience in Northeast Cambodia. Land, 7(4), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040122
Heesen, R., Genty, E., Rossano, F., Zuberbühler, K., & Bangerter, A. (2017). Social play as joint action: A framework to study the evolution of shared intentionality as an interactional achievement. Learning & Behavior, 45(4), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-017-0287-9
Hjort, M. (2020). Who should be governed to reduce deforestation and how? Multiple governmentalities at the REDD+ negotiations. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419837298
Ishikawa, M., & Itakura, S. (2024). The development of social learning: From pedagogical cues to selective learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1466618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1466618
Jovanović, M. M., & Milanović, M. M. (2017). Remote Sensing and Forest Conservation: Challenges of Illegal Logging in Kursumlija Municipality (Serbia). In S. Chakravarty & G. Shukla (Eds.), Forest Ecology and Conservation. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/67666
Konstantinavičienė, J. (2023). Assessment of Potential of Forest Wood Biomass in Terms of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 15(18), 13871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813871
Kurnijanto, P., Rijal, S., Mujetahid, A., & Dassir, M. (2023). Central Sulawesi Forest Park: A Pattern of Tenure Conflict Resolution. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(7), 2121–2126. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180714
Maccioni, S., d’Angella, F., De Carlo, M., & Sfogliarini, B. (2024). Stakeholder Engagement and Triggers for Sustainable Development in Complex Fragile Ecosystems: Evidence from Alpine Trentino Region. Sustainability, 16(22), 9879. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229879
Maryudi, A., Sahide, M. A. K., Daulay, M. H., Yuniati, D., Syafitri, W., Sadiyo, S., & Fisher, M. R. (2022). Holding social forestry hostage in Indonesia: Contested bureaucracy mandates and potential escape pathways. Environmental Science & Policy, 128, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.013
Mogan, R., Bulbulia, J., & Fischer, R. (2019). Joint Action Enhances Cohesion and Positive Affect, but Suppresses Aspects of Creativity When Combined With Shared Goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02790
Ninan, J., Clegg, S., Mahalingam, A., & Sankaran, S. (2024). Governance Through Trust: Community Engagement in an Australian City Rebuilding Precinct. Project Management Journal, 55(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231182045
Prayitno, D. E. (2020). Kemitraan Konservasi Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Konflik Tenurial dalam Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 6(2), 184–209. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v6i2.175
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
Roengtam, S., Agustiyara, A., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). Making Network Governance Work in Forest Land-Use Policy in the Local Government. Sage Open, 13(3), 21582440231194491. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194491
Sagali, H., Mang’enya, E., & Huang, Y. (2023). Non-Timber Forest Products By-Laws and Their Impacts on Households’ Food Security in Kondoa District, United Republic of Tanzania. The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15323
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Sirimorok, N., Faturachmat, F., Dhiaulhaq, A., Maryudi, A., Batiran, K. B., & Supratman, S. (2023). Blind spots and spotlights in bureaucratic politics: An analysis of policy co‐production in environmental governance dynamics in Indonesia. Development Policy Review, e12693. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12693
Silva-Jean, M. D., & Kneipp, J. M. (2024). “Social learning, innovation, and sustainability: The search for directions beyond a systematic literature review.” Heliyon, 10(7), e28431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28431
Simorangkir, W. S., Golar, G., Massiri, S. D., Umar, S., & Rachman, I. (2024). Indonesia’s Forestry and Other Land Use Net Sink 2030: How Preparedness Central Sulawesi to Start the Program? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1357(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1357/1/012001
Syahlan, S. (2021). Effective and Efficient Synchronization in Harmonization of Regulations Indonesia. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.7
Tanjung, A. (2019). Kedudukan Hutan Adat Di Atas Tanah Ulayat Dalam Pemanfaatan Hutan. Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.47313/ppl.v4i7.590
Tiki, L., Marquardt, K., & Abdallah, J. M. (2025). Participatory forest management: Analysis of local forest governance and implications for REDD+ implementation in the Adaba-Dodola Forest in Ethiopia. Trees, Forests and People, 19, 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100780
Tola, F. K. (2023). Drivers of Forest cover changes in and around Jorgo Wato Forest, West Wallagga, Oromia, Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(8), e19053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19053
Van Der Wel, R. P. R. D., Becchio, C., Curioni, A., & Wolf, T. (2021). Understanding joint action: Current theoretical and empirical approaches. Acta Psychologica, 215, 103285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103285
Zafra-Calvo, N., Ortega, U., Sertutxa, U., & Moreaux, C. (2024). Identifying key actors, barriers and opportunities to lead a transition towards sustainable forest management: An application to the Basque Country, Spain. Trees, Forests and People, 18, 100727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100727
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hasriani Muis, Golar, Arman Maiwa, Abdul Rahman, Hauris, Wahyu Syahputra Simorangkir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
