Vol. 11 No. 7 (2025): July
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Enhancing Student Participation through a Validated Cooperative Flipped Classroom Framework in Technology Education

Authors

Jusmita Weriza , Irfan Ananda Ismail , Henny Yustisia , Zulkifli , Lise Asnur

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11445

Published:

2025-07-25

Downloads

Abstract

Abstract: This study addresses the challenges of limited student participation and ineffective group learning in Information Systems Analysis & Design education. The objective was to develop, validate, and test a seven-syntax flipped classroom model integrated with cooperative learning. The study employed Borg and Gall's R&D methodology with 60 students in experimental and control groups at Universitas Ekasakti. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for validity and practicality, and independent t-tests for effectiveness. The results demonstrated exceptional model validity (≥88%), high practicality from instructors (≥85%) and students (≥86%), and significant effectiveness. The experimental group showed superior cognitive (85.2 vs. 75.1), affective (collaboration and responsibility), and psychomotor outcomes (88.5 vs. 78.2) compared to the control group. In conclusion, the validated seven-syntax model successfully improves student participation and learning outcomes by balancing asynchronous learning with synchronous collaboration, providing a valuable framework for technology education.

Keywords:

Blended Learning Cooperative learning Flipped classroom Information systems education Science and technology education SDLC UMI

References

Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacio, F. J., Ayala, M. D. M., & Sánchez-Aguilera, J. D. Á. (2020). What Effects Do Didactic Interventions Have on Students’ Attitudes Towards Science? A Meta-Analysis. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 573–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9702-9

Andersen, M. S., Ravaja, N., Parmar, D., & Krageloh, C. (2021). The validation and further development of a multidimensional cognitive load scale for virtual environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12478

Anđić, B., Ulbrich, E., Dana-Picard, T., Cvjetićanin, S., Petrović, F., Lavicza, Z., & Maričić, M. (2023). A Phenomenography Study of STEM Teachers’ Conceptions of Using Three-Dimensional Modeling and Printing (3DMP) in Teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10005-0

Anggunan, B., Andrianisa, I., Nurhayani, N., & Andriansyah, A. (2022). Kebutuhan Media Interaktif Virtual Reality 360o untuk Menunjang Implementasi Project-Based Learning di SMK Kompetensi Keahlian Akuntansi dan Keuangan Lembaga. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 69–80.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 30(9), 1–18. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/the-flipped-classroom-a-survey-of-the-research

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction (4th ed.). Longman.

Canelas, D. A., Arcaute, K., Butler, S. W., & Plett, S. D. (2017). Cooperative learning in organic chemistry increases student assessment of learning gains in key transferable skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00014f

Chevalier, M., Ahlgren, S., Basilico, M., Michaelson, P., Riley, A., Wagh, A., & Walker, M. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z

DeMonbrun, M., Finelli, C. J., Prince, M., Borrego, M., Crockett, C., Ford, J., Guzman, R. P., Hovard, R., Lowery, B., McFarland, A., Nagel, R., O’Neal, C., Pawley, A., Plumlee, D., Reeping, D., Rickey, D., & Smith, B. (2017). Creating an Instrument to Measure Student Response to Instructional Practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20162

Dougherty, S. M., Lovenheim, M. F., Ma, L., & Owens, A. (2020). Can growth in the availability of STEM technical education improve equality in participation?: evidence from Massachusetts. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1578818

Erbil, D. G. (2020). A Review of Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning Method Within the Context of Vygotsky Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157

Estrada, Á. C. M., & Galindo, J. S. P. (2019). Flipped classroom to improve university student centered learning and academic performance. Social Sciences, 8(11), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110315

Festiyed, F., Ismail, I. A., Lufri, L., Mawardi, M., & Insani, M. (2025). Culturally Responsive Science Education Through Ethnoscience: A Meta-Analysis of Impact on Junior High School Students. Multidisciplinary Reviews. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026004

Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616726

Giani, M. S., Parrish, K., & Donaldson, M. N. (2019). Does Vocational Still Imply Tracking? Examining the Evolution of Career and Technical Education Curricular Policy in Texas. Educational Policy, 33(7), 1002–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817745375

Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (2003). Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. Routledge.

González-Valero, G., Fuentes, S., González-Jiménez, D., García-Santos, F., Gómez-Salgado, J., & Ruiz-Fernández, M. D. (2019). Use of meditation and cognitive behavioral therapies for the treatment of stress, depression and anxiety in students. A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224394

Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Tanner-Smith, E. (2020). Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302

Gottfried, M. A., Sotelo, R., & Plasman, J. S. (2018). From Secondary to Postsecondary: Charting an Engineering Career and Technical Education Pathway. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20236

Hernon, O., Smith, G. D., Cody, D., Cunningham, D., Feeney, S., McCarthy, V., O’Connell, S., & Mulcahy, H. (2023). The use of educational technology in teaching and assessing clinical psychomotor skills in nursing and midwifery education: A state-of-the-art literature review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 45, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.01.005

Hew, T., Wah, Y. B., Don, Y., & Ping, T. P. (2016). Predicting instructional effectiveness of cloud-based virtual learning environment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), 1557–1584. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2015-0475

Heyer, K., Kunz, P. J., Lütz, F., Müller, F., Peschke, M., Stenger, R., & Wichelhaus, J. (2017). Compression therapy cross-sectional observational survey about knowledge and practical treatment of specialised and non-specialised nurses and therapists. International Wound Journal, 14(6), 1148–1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12773

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. clayto. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Mountain View, CA: Innosight Institute.

Huang, H., Shi, F., Wu, M., Guo, Y., Chang, M., Tan, C., Jiang, R., & Huang, Y. (2022). Technological solutions for promoting employees’ knowledge levels and practical skills: An SVVR-based blended learning approach for professional training. Computers & Education, 189, 104593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104593

Insani, M., Mawardi, M., & Ismail, I. A. (2022). The system of flipped classroom based on guided inquiry learning on redox reactions and electrochemistry using Moodle. International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research, 6(5), 53–56. Retrieved from http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/5/abs/IJAPR220510.html

Irwanto, I. (2019). Kesiapan program studi pendidikan vokasional teknik elektro dalam melaksanakan praktik industri. Taman Vokasi, 7(2), 96–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/jtv.v7i2.6297

Ismail, A. (2022). Sistem Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing Menggunakan Learning Management System Moodie pada Materi Termokimia untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Universitas Negeri Padang Repository.

Ismail, I. A., Pernadi, N. L., & Febriyanti, A. (2022). How to Grab and Determine the Size of The Sample For Research. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research (IJAAR), 6(9), 88–92. Retrieved from https://repository.unp.ac.id/id/eprint/41155/

Kazemi, A., Heidari, S., Hesampour, S., Rahbar, A., & Kazemian, Z. (2020). Dynamic assessment in English classrooms: Fostering learners’ reading comprehension and motivation. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1788912. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1788912

Klepsch, M., Thurmaier, F., Hoppstock, M., Wieser, M., & Dresel, M. (2017). Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997

Kuleto, V., Stefanova, G., Kavoura, A., Radosavljević, Ž., Kuzmanović, M., Božić, G., Ilić, B., Perović, N., Dobrojevic, M., Nikolić, D., & Andria, K. (2022). The Potential of Blockchain Technology in Higher Education as Perceived by Students in Serbia, Romania, and Portugal. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2), 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020749

Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1

Love, J. N., Stojan, J. N., & Howell, L. E. (2016). A novel specialty-specific, collaborative faculty development opportunity in education research: Program evaluation at five years. Academic Medicine, 91(4), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001070

Maolidah, I. S., Ruhimat, T., & Dewi, L. (2017). Efektivitas penerapan model pembelajaran flipped classroom pada peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Edutechnologia, 1(2), 160–170. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/edutechnologia/article/view/9147

Martinengo, L., Ruzevicius, M., Girdwoyn, J., Koutsouri, E., Karagiannis, V., Charalambous, M., Gergely, D., Szabo, A., Mihaylov, S., Staikov, B., Yaneva, A., Pencheva, P., & Hadjipanayi, E. (2019). Digital education for the management of chronic wounds in health care professionals: Protocol for a systematic review by the digital health education collaboration. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(3), e12488. https://doi.org/10.2196/12488

Muirhead, K., & McNally, K. (2021). Establishing the effectiveness of technology-enabled dementia education for health and social care practitioners: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01781-8

Munir, M., Pratiwi, R., & Khusnah, H. (2018). Flipped classroom with cooperative learning as a cornerstone. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.001

Murzo, Y., & Leshchynskyi, O. (2021). Use of Information Technologies in Developing Foreign Language Competence for Professional Interaction of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students Specializing in Mineral Resources. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(3), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i03.17875

Nathan, M. J., Walkington, C., Petrosino, A., Horowitz, S., Alibali, M. W., Boncoddo, N., Brooks, M., Karwatowska-Prokopiena, A., Wolfgram, M., Srisurichan, R., Toman, D., Schenke, K., Williams, C., Purzer, & Puntambekar, S. (2017). Threading mathematics through symbols, sketches, software, silicon, and wood: Teachers produce and maintain cohesion to support STEM integration. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1287046

Ng, D. T. K., Guo, L., & Ng, L. H. (2024). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411

Pellegrino, J. W. (2016). A Framework for Conceptualizing and Evaluating the Validity of Instructionally Relevant Assessments. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1145550

Petrovych, O. B., & Popova, L. L. (2021). The usage of augmented reality technologies in professional training of future teachers of Ukrainian language and literature. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2898, 315–333. Retrieved from https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2898/paper17.pdf

Pinto, M., Fernández-Pascual, S. F., Gómez-Cambronero, L., Meneses, J., & Ruipérez, J. (2020). Digital technologies in support of students learning in higher education: Literature review. Digital Education Review, 37, 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.343-360

Rahman, M. M., & Hassan, Y. E. (2021). Impact of Practical Skills on Academic Performance: A Data-Driven Analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 139975–139993. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3119145

Rau, M. A., Weinstein, A., & Bader, A. (2017). Unpacking “active Learning”: A combination of flipped classroom and collaboration support is more effective but collaboration support alone is not. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00240

Robert, J. (2016). Coordinated Implementation and Evaluation of Flipped Classes and Peer-Led Team Learning in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1993–1998. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00395

Rutkowski, D., & Svetina, D. (2016). Causal inferences with large scale assessment data: using a validity framework. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-016-0019-1

Sarkany, D., & Kim, S. M. (2017). Providing Feedback: Practical Skills and Strategies. Academic Radiology, 24(6), 740–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.023

Şengel, E. (2016). To FLIP or not to FLIP: Comparative case study in higher education in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.034

Setiawan, B. (2017). The development of local wisdom-based natural science module to improve science literation of students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9595

Shattuck, J., Marks, A., & Smith, R. S. (2016). A Parallel Controlled Study of the Effectiveness of a Partially Flipped Organic Chemistry Course on Student Performance, Perceptions, and Course Completion. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00393

Stoltzfus, J. R., Hampton, S. R., & Thoms, B. M. (2016). Does the room matter? Active learning in traditional and enhanced lecture spaces. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar59. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0126

Suartama, I. K., & Setyaningrum, E. W. (2019). Development of an instructional design model for mobile blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(16), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i16.10633

Sudira, P. (2017). TVET abad XXI: Filosofi, teori, konsep dan strategi pembelajaran vokasional. UNY Press.

Truax, M. L., & Womack, A. J. (2018). The Impact of Teacher Language and Growth Mindset Feedback on Writing Motivation. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1340529

Verawardina, U., & Jama, J. (2019). Philosophy TVET di era disrupsi revolusi industri 4.0 di Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(3), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i3.17156

Verloigne, M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Tanghe, A., Brug, J., Paw, M. J. M., De Cocker, K., Lacey, E., Haerens, L., Adachi-Mejia, A. M., Klasson, F. A., te Velde, S., Thorsen, T., Puderewski, M., van Stralen, M. M., Van Cauwenberghe, E., Maes, L., Marques-Vidal, P., Charreire, H., Oppert, J. M., & Bere, E. (2016). Mediating effects of self-efficacy, benefits and barriers on the association between peer and parental factors and physical activity among adolescent girls with a lower educational level. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157216

Villalba, M. T., Fernandez, D. V, & Lopez, S. P. (2018). Factors with influence on the adoption of the flipped classroom model in technical and science and technology education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 441–469. https://doi.org/10.28945/4121

Volodymyrovych, T. Y., & Savastynovych, M. V. (2021). Distance learning technologies in online and mixed learning in pre-professional education of medical lyceum students. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research, 11(4), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.51847/ZLy2idWa4f

Wang, J., Wang, S., Wang, J., Song, Z., Zhou, B., Ren, W., Yan, C., Li, Z., & Liu, S. (2017). The Construction of Enterprise Tacit Knowledge Sharing Stimulation System Oriented to Employee Individual. Procedia Engineering, 174, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.139

Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055

Author Biographies

Jusmita Weriza, Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Irfan Ananda Ismail, Sekolah Pascasarjana Pendidikan IPA Universitas Negeri Padang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Henny Yustisia, Universitas Negeri Padang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Zulkifli, Universitas Negeri Padang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Lise Asnur, Universitas Negeri Padang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Weriza, J., Ismail, I. A., Yustisia, H., Zulkifli, & Asnur, L. (2025). Enhancing Student Participation through a Validated Cooperative Flipped Classroom Framework in Technology Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(7), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11445