Effectiveness of Dick & Carey Instructional Design Model and Learning Attitudes Towards Science Learning Outcomes at UPT SMPN 2 Bayang
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.12241Published:
2025-07-25Downloads
Abstract
Learning outcomes are important for students. In the implementation of learning in schools, efforts to improve student learning outcomes experience many obstacles and barriers. This study aims to test the effect of the Dick & Carey instructional design model and learning attitudes on students' science learning outcomes. This instructional design model is expected to improve students' science learning outcomes compared to the TPACK instructional design model. The type of research used is a quasi-experiment with a Treatment by Block design. This study involved 2 classes, the experimental class, namely the class that was given treatment with the application of the Dick & Carey instructional design model, while the control class was the class that used the TPACK instructional design model. The results of the data analysis showed that students who were taught with the Dick & Carey instructional design model, both those with good or bad attitudes, obtained significantly higher learning outcomes than the science learning outcomes of students taught with the TPACK instructional design model. And there is the effectiveness of the application of the Dick & Carey instructional design model and learning attitudes towards student learning outcomes. In general, learning with the Dick & Carey instructional design model is more effective than learning with the TPACK instructional design model.
Keywords:
Design model Dick & Carey instructional Learning attitude TPACK instructional design modelReferences
Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep499. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289
Ahshan, R. (2021). A Framework of Implementing Strategies for Active Student Engagement in Remote/Online Teaching and Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090483
Alonso-Nuez, M. J., Gil-Lacruz, A. I., & Rosell-Martínez, J. (2024). Pass or good grades: Direct and mediated effects of a teaching method. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 100937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100937
Asiah, S. & Festiyed. (2024). Development of Diagnostic, Formative and Summative Assessment Instruments in the PjBL Model to Stimulate Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(10), 7486–7492. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.8757
Beigzadeh, A., Bazyar, H., Delzendeh, M., Razmi, M. H., & Sharifi, N. (2024). Comparing the effect of lecture method and cooperative teaching method on the learning, communication skills, and attitudes of students: A quasi-experimental study. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1449538
Bessas, N., Tzanaki, E., Vavougios, D., & Plagianakos, V. P. (2024). Diagnosing students’ misconception in Hydrostatic Pressure through a 4-tier test. Heliyon, 10(23), e40425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40425
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
De Bruijn-Smolders, M., & Prinsen, F. R. (2024). Effective student engagement with blended learning: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(23), e39439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39439
Ernawati, M. D. W., Asrial, A., Perdana, R., Septi, S. E., & Rahmi, R. (2021). Evaluation of Students’ Attitudes and Science Process Skills toward Middle School Science Subject in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 11(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202110
Fatimah, F., & Muamar, M. R. (2024a). Analysis of Students’ Needs and Characteristics toward Science to Support Differentiated Learning of Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6731
Fatimah, F., & Muamar, M. R. (2024b). Analysis of Students’ Needs and Characteristics toward Science to Support Differentiated Learning of Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6731
Galeboe, K. A., Moalosi, R., Rapitsenyane, Y., & Ruele, V. (2025). What is the impact of using design and technology pedagogy to support the attainment of 21st-century skills? Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00604-5
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Ismail, M., Zubair, M., Alqadri, B., & Basariah, B. (2023). Integration of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge in 21st Century Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2363–2367. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3732
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Lee, W. S. (2020). An Experimental Investigation Into the Application of a Learning-From-Mistakes Approach Among Freshmen Students. Sage Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931938
Lorenz, E., Krulatz, A., & Torgersen, E. N. (2021). Embracing linguistic and cultural diversity in multilingual EAL classrooms: The impact of professional development on teacher beliefs and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103428
Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
Muhab, S., Rini, T. D. S., Erdawati, E., & Irwanto, I. (2024). Evaluation of Differentiated Learning in Chemistry by Using the CIPP Evaluation Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.5985
Mukhibat, M. (2023). Differentiate Learning Management to Optimize Student Needs and Learning Outcomes in An Independent Curriculum. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 15(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.2386
Müller, C., Mildenberger, T., & Steingruber, D. (2023). Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: Why are some courses more effective than others? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00379-x
Nja, C. O., Orim, R. E., Neji, H. A., Ukwetang, J. O., Uwe, U. E., & Ideba, M. A. (2022). Students’ attitude and academic achievement in a flipped classroom. Heliyon, 8(1), e08792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08792
Nugraha, M. S., Purnasari, M., & Dedih, U. (2024). Increasing Student Learning Motivation through of the Dick and Carey Model in Islamic Religious Education. FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 9(2), 203–318. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v9i2.10267
Onasanya, S. A., & Ajamu, A. O. (2024). Formative and Summative Assessment Using Technology: A Critical Review. Mimbar Ilmu, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v29i1.72042
Parwata, K. Y. L., & R Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. (2020). The Effectiveness Of Learning Tools In Science Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503(1), 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012049
Sa’adu Matazu, S. (2023). Influence of Dick and Carey instructional model on secondary school biology students’ performance in Katsina State, Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 7(3), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/13301
Schildkamp, K., Van Der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Sial, D. Z. A., Fatima, Z., & Fatima, D. S. Z. (2024). Addie Model of Instructional Effectiveness: Analyzing The Impact On Students Learning. Journal of Law & Social Studies, 6(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.06.01.6472
Simón-Grábalos, D., Fonseca, D., Aláez, M., Romero-Yesa, S., & Fresneda-Portillo, C. (2025). Systematic Review of the Literature on Interventions to Improve Self-Regulation of Learning in First-Year University Students. Education Sciences, 15(3), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030372
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022a). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022b). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Subheesh, N. P., & Sethy, S. S. (2020). Learning through Assessment and Feedback Practices: A Critical Review of Engineering Education Settings. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114157
Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657
Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
Wahyudi, Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., & Samsudin, A. (2023). The Needs Analysis in the Development of Level of Inquiry with Project Assignments Model to Promote the Creativity of Prospective Physics Teachers. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i4.66461
Wiradarma, K. S., Suarni, N. K., & Renda, N. T. (2021). The Relationship of Learning Interest to Science Online Learning Outcomes for Third-Grade Elementary School Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i3.39544
Wulayalin, K. A., & Suprihatiningrum, J. (2024). Creating Accessible Chemistry Content for Students with Disabilities: Findings from Schools Providing Inclusive Education in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2199–2210. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6755
Yunita, E., Rachmawati, F., & Hilaliyah, T. (2023). Meta Analisis Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(10), 7499–7505. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i10.2971
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kiki Permatasari, Darmansyah, Zulhendri Zen, Ridwan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
