Analysis of Potential and Value Chains as a Strategy for Developing Non-Timber Forest Products in Central Kalimantan Forests
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i9.12664Published:
2025-09-25Downloads
Abstract
Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) have great potential in supporting the economy of forest communities through sustainable utilization based on local wisdom. This study aims to analyze the potential of NTFPs, identify value chains, and formulate development strategies to improve the welfare of forest communities. The study was conducted in three villages: Tuwung Village, Luwuk Kanan Village, and Sei Gohong Village in Central Kalimantan. The research method used a qualitative and quantitative approach through interviews, observations, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), and market analysis. The development strategy analysis used SWOT. The results showed that NTFPs: rattan (Calamus spp.), stingless bee honey (Trigona sp.), and medicinal plants: bajakah (Uncaria gambir Roxb.), Dayak onion/lemba onion (Eleutherine bulbosa) are the types of NTFPs most dominantly utilized by the community, both for personal use, sale, or partly for personal use and partly for sale. However, the NTFP value chain is still weak in post-harvest aspects, processing, and market access. The SWOT analysis results show that the NTFP product development strategy falls into Quadrant IV (defensive strategy). This defensive strategy involves rationalizing activities, focusing on one or two potential superior products. Tuwung Village focuses on stingless bee honey, Luwuk Kanan Village on rattan, and Sei Gohong on medicinal plants (bajakah, Dayak onions/lemba onions). Furthermore, strengthening community capacity, improving group institutions, diversifying products, and supporting policies are key to realizing a sustainable NTFP-based economy. This study confirms that value chain development and appropriate strategies for selecting NTFP products are crucial for promoting inclusive and sustainable economic development for communities surrounding forests in Central Kalimantan.
Keywords:
Defensive strategy Flagship products SWOT strategy Value chainReferences
Amusa, T. O., Avana-Tientcheu, M. L., Awazi, N. P., & Chirwa, P. W. (2024). The Role of Non-Timber Forest Products for Sustainable Livelihoods in African Multifunctional Landscapes. In Trees in a Sub-Saharan Multi-functional Landscape: Research, Management, and Policy (pp. 153–178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69812-5_8
Baguna, F. L., & Kaddas, F. (2021). Analisis rantai nilai dan kontribusi pendapatan terhadap pemanfaatan HHBK kayu manis di Pulau Tidore. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(9), 1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i9.307
Banihashemi, S. A., & Rejaei, Z. (2016). Assessment of environmental conditions and internal capabilities affecting university strategies (IFE, EFE, SWOT, & AHP Models). International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(10), 558–567. https://doi.org/ 10.18488/journal.1/2016.6.10/1.10.558.567
Chyi Lee, C., & Yang, J. (2000). Knowledge value chain. Journal of Management Development, 19(9), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710010378228
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches by John W (Creswell (ed.); fifth). SAGE Publications, Inc. z-lib.org.
Damayanti, N. A., Probowulan, D., & Nastiti, A. S. (2021). Analisis rantai nilai sebagai upaya untuk meningkatkan keunggulan kompetitif (Studi Kasus Pada UD. Ijen Batik Bondowoso). Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 12–24. Retrieved from https://publikasi.polije.ac.id/asersi/article/view/2687
David, F. R., Creek, S. A., & David, F. R. (2019). What is the Key to Effective SWOT Analysis, Including AQCD Factors. SAM Advanced Management Journal (Society for Advancement of Management), 84(1). Retrieved from https://www.strategyclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/AQCD-Paper.pdf
Emon, M. M. H. (2024). Research Approach: A Comparative Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies in Social Science Research. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202412.1128.v1
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.) (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Izan, A. (2025). Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Baduy [Doctoral Dissertation: Universitas Kuningan]. Retrieved from https://rama.uniku.ac.id/id/eprint/2734/2/BAB I.pdf
Koulelis, P. P., Tsiaras, S., & Andreopoulou, Z. S. (2023). Greece’s Forest Sector from the Perspective of Timber Production: Evolution or Decline? Forests, 14(12), 2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122331
Masya, S., Sangadji, I. M., & Isan, M. (2025). Pengelolaan Hutan Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Upaya Konservasi dan Peningkatan Ekonomi di Papua Barat Daya. Agriva Journal (Journal of Agriculture and Sylva), 3(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.33506/agriva.v3i1.4195
Modjo, A. S., Baderan, D. W. K., & others. (2025). Analisis Kelembagaan dalam Ekologi Manusia: Studi Kasus Bambu Kuning sebagai Bambu Adat di Sungai Biyonga-Bulota. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 1(03), 286–298. Retrieved from https://ojs.ruangpublikasi.com/index.php/jpim/article/view/394
Muliyani, I., Kartika, A. N., Mely, P., & Prasetiyo, T. (2023). Analisis Implementasi Dalam Mewujudkan Ekonomi Hijau Di Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 14(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.36982/jiegmk.v14i2.3466
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Pandey, A. K., Tripathi, Y. C., & Kumar, A. (2016). Non timber forest products (NTFPs) for sustained livelihood: Challenges and strategies. Research Journal of Forestry, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjf.2016
Paramita, M., Muhlisin, S., & Palawa, I. (2018). Peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat melalui pemanfaatan sumber daya lokal. Qardhul Hasan: Media Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.30997/qh.v4i1.1186
Phadermrod, B., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2019). Importance-performance analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.009
Sahidu, A., Muktasam, M., Nurjannah, S., & Hayati, H. (2018). Analisis Rantai Nilai Kemiri Dan Strategi Pemberdayaan Petani: Studi Kasus Di Desa Batudulang Kecamatan Batulanteh-Kabupaten Sumbawa. Jurnal Agrimansion, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29303/agrimansion.v19i1.226
Shackleton, C. M., Pandey, A. K., & Ticktin, T. (2015). Ecological sustainability for non-timber forest products. Taylor & Francis Milton Park. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315851587
Siddik, M. (2023). Analisis Rantai Nilai Dan Nilai Tambah Komoditas Bambu Sebagai HHBK Unggulan Pulau Lombok Nusa Tenggara Barat-Indonesia. AGROTEKSOS, 33(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.29303/agroteksos.v33i1.806
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syofya, H. (2024). Menciptakan Value Added bagi Ekonomi Lokal dalam Tinjauan Model Rantai Blok dan Konsep Rantai Nilai: Sebuah studi literatur. Journal on Education, 6(2), 12561–12576. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/diDVR
Wulandari, F., & Sarjan, M. (2024). Peran Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu Dalam Mewujudkan Keberlanjutan Sumberdaya Hutan di Indonesia: Suatu Kajian Aksiologi Ilmu. HUTAN TROPIKA, 19(2), 404–413. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=80179853
Yudha, A., & Pancasakti, R. (2022). Analisis SWOT dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Desanta (Indonesian Of Interdisciplinary Journal), 2(2), 211–218. Retrieved from https://jurnal.desantapublisher.com/index.php/desanta/article/view/17
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yanarita, Afentina, Lies Indrayanti, Yusintha Tanduh, Milad Madiyawati, Chartina Pidjath, Patricia Erosa Putir, Grace Siska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
