Collaborative Problem-Solving Approach for Fostering Students’ Creativity in Physics Practicum
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i12.13121Published:
2025-12-25Downloads
Abstract
Creativity is a crucial competence in 21st-century science education; however, physics laboratory activities in higher education are still predominantly conducted using verification-based models, which provide limited opportunities for creative thinking development. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of a Collaborative Problem-Solving Laboratory (CPSL) approach in enhancing the creativity of prospective physics teachers. The study employed a pre-experimental one-group pre-test–post-test design involving 20 undergraduate students enrolled in a Basic Physics Practicum course. Students’ creativity was measured using an adapted Scientific Creativity Test encompassing fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Data were analyzed using the normalized gain (N-Gain) to determine the extent of improvement in each creativity indicator. The results revealed a substantial increase in students’ creativity after the implementation of CPSL. Three indicators—Unusual Uses, Problem Finding, and Product Improvement—achieved high N-Gain values (0.7–0.8), while Creative Imagination, Creative Experimental Ability, and Product Design showed moderate improvement (0.4–0.6). These findings indicate that integrating collaborative problem-solving processes throughout pre-laboratory, laboratory, and post-laboratory activities can effectively promote students’ creative thinking. It can be concluded that CPSL has the potential to transform physics laboratory practices from routine verification tasks into collaborative and creativity-oriented learning experiences.
Keywords:
Creativity Physics Lab Collaborative Problem Solving Physics EducationReferences
Adeoye, M. A., & Jimoh, H. A. (2023). Problem-Solving Skills Among 21st-Century Learners Toward Creativity and Innovation Ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.62708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.62708
Alnuaimi, S. B. A., & Abdulhabib, A. A. (2023). The influence of service innovation on police performance: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(8), 1999–2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2022-0269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2022-0269
Anoop, G., Kolangarakath, A., Madathil, K. C., Shakour, K., Short, R., & Ransom, T. (2023). Transitioning Lab Courses to Online Platforms by Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19: Strategies, Learning Outcomes, Perceptions, and Challenges. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 67(1), 2577–2578. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231221720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231221720
Arifah, N., Kadir, F., & Nuroso, H. (2021). Hubungan Antara Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Siswa. Karst: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Terapannya, 4(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v4i1.946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v4i1.946
Asiksoy, G. (2023). Effects of Virtual Lab Experiences on Students’ Achievement and Perceptions of Learning Physics. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (IJOE), 19(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i11.39049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i11.39049
Astalini, Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Septi, S. E., & Perdana, R. (2023). Effect of Using Inquiry Learning Model on Creative Character and Hard Work Character in High School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6321–6329. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3043
Beaty, R. E., Zeitlen, D. C., Baker, B. S., & Kenett, Y. N. (2021). Forward flow and creative thought: Assessing associative cognition and its role in divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100859
Bretz, S. L. (2019). Evidence for the Importance of Laboratory Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00874
Coştu, F. (2024). Enhancing Gifted Students’ Creative Thinking Through Science Laboratory. European Journal of Education, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12784
Draper, J. T., Ryba, R., & Connell, S. D. (2021). Sparking Creativity in Science Education. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.495
Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, Dr. F. (2022). Argümantasyona Dayalı Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Uygulamalarının Fen Öğretmen Adayı Eğitimindeki Etkililiği. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 15(4), 721–757. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1070893 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1070893
Ermayanti, E., Anwar, Y., & Santri, D. J. (2021). Analysis of students’ creative thinking on plant microtechnical laboratory practices. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.12321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.12321
Govindasamy, P., Cumming, T. M., & Abdullah, N. (2024). Validity and reliability of a needs analysis questionnaire for the development of a creativity module. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24(3), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12659
Grushow, A., Hunnicutt, S. S., Muñiz, M. N., Reisner, B. A., Schaertel, S., & Whitnell, R. (2022). A Community’s Vision of Instruction in the Chemistry Laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(12), 3811–3813. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01092
Hidayah, R. (2023). Development Of An Instrument For Assessment Of Creative Thinking Skills Based On Collaborative Problem Based Learning. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 4(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.635
Hsu, J. L., & Rowland‐Goldsmith, M. (2021). Student perceptions of an inquiry‐based molecular biology lecture and lab following a mid‐semester transition to online teaching. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21478
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
Ismail, N., Desa, S., & Balakrishnan, B. (2018). Science Creative Teaching Design for Science Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i4/4156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i4/4156
Kruse, J., Menke, L., & Solem, L. (2022). Comparing students’ perceptions of the thinking required in inquiry‐based and traditional laboratories. School Science and Mathematics, 122(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12514
Kusdiastuti, M., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Development of guided inquiry learning tools combined with advance organizer to increase students’ understanding of physics concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 022014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022014
Michalsky, T., & Cohen, A. (2021). Prompting Socially Shared Regulation of Learning and Creativity in Solving STEM Problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722535
Muawiyah, S. N. (2024). Fostering Creative and Critical Thinking Skills through Collaborative Learning: A Theoretical Approach. International Student Conference on Business, Education, Economics, Accounting, and Management (ISC-BEAM), 1(1), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.011.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.011.43
Muliyadi, L., Doyan, A., Susilawati, Hamidi, Hakim, S., & Munandar, H. (2023). Training on Using PhET Virtual Media on Newton’s Law of Gravity for Class X Students at Islamic Senior High School of Syaikh Abdurrahman Kotaraja, East Lombok. Unram Journal of Community Service, 1(1), 15–18. Retrieved from https://journals.balaipublikasi.id/index.php/jcss/article/view/68
Murwaningsih, T., & Fauziah, M. (2020). The Effectiveness of Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Learning Model on Divergent Thinking Skills. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 4(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v4i1.49460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v4i1.49460
Nurhasnawati, N., Muzayanati, A., & Ichsan, I. (2023). Effect of the Mentimeter Application-Based PBL Model on Student Learning Interests in Science Learning Courses Integrated with Religious Values. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4331–4337. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3569
Permata Sari, I., Nanto, D., & Putri, A. A. (2022). Pengaruh Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Fisika Siswa menggunakan Teknik Meta-analisis dengan Model PBL (Problem Based Learning). Jurnal MENTARI: Manajemen, Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.34306/mentari.v1i1.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34306/mentari.v1i1.124
Ponce-Delgado, A., Pocevičienė, R., & Rubira-García, R. (2024). Developing Creative Potential in School Children through Museums as Cultural Institutions: A Case Study in Madrid, Spain. Education Sciences, 14(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030261
Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nair, V. K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022). Virtual Laboratories- A historical review and bibliometric analysis of the past three decades. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11055–11087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11058-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11058-9
Saputra, H., Firmansyah, J., & Ihsan, A. (2023). Inquiry Project Laboratory: The Collaborative Problem Solving and Critical Thinking on Laboratory. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5038
Simelane-Mnisi, S. (2023). Effectiveness of LMS Digital Tools Used by the Academics to Foster Students’ Engagement. Education Sciences, 13(10), 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100980
Soomro, S. A., Casakin, H., & Georgiev, G. V. (2022). A Systematic Review on FabLab Environments and Creativity: Implications for Design. Buildings, 12(6), 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060804
Tigre, F. B., Lopes Henriques, P., & Curado, C. (2024). Creativity for Problem Solving in the Digital Era: Configurations of Leadership Profiles. Journal of Leadership Studies, 18(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21874
Unwakoly, S., & Munawaroh, H. (2024). Portraying Critical and Creative Thinking Skills of Chemistry Teachers Candidate in Biochemistry Laboratory Activity. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15661
Wei, W. (2024). The Effect of Group Cooperation on College Students’ Learning Motivation. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 845–850. https://doi.org/10.54097/p7ezys61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/p7ezys61
Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
Yildirim, F. S. (2021). Scientific Studies on Laboratory Based Learning Approach. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(1), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.773602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.773602
Zoabi, M. (2022). The teachers’ perception of the factors that promote the cultivation of creative thinking. Interdisciplinary Research in Counseling, Ethics and Philosophy, 2(6), 64–98. https://doi.org/10.59209/ircep.v2i6.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59209/ircep.v2i6.43
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Saiyidah Mahtari, Arif Sholahuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
