Designing a Test Instrument to Reveal Students’ Reasoning Abilities on Archimedes’ Principle
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13440Published:
2026-02-07Downloads
Abstract
Visuo-haptic simulator-based learning can help students understand the relationship between buoyancy and the volume of displaced fluid. In this study, students experienced a physical simulation of an upward force, which has been shown to improve conceptual understanding and reduce misconceptions commonly found in traditional classrooms. This study aimed to design a test instrument that could reveal in detail students' reasoning abilities related to Archimedes' Law, specifically regarding the phenomena of floating, levitating, and sinking. The study used a qualitative approach through two stages of testing administered to 31 first-year physics students who had taken a basic physics course. The initial test used the five-block problem developed by Loverude to identify students' reasoning patterns, which mostly showed misconceptions, such as determining the final position of an object based on mass rather than density. Based on this analysis, four diagnostic questions were developed to explore students' understanding of the differences between density, buoyancy, and the application of Newton's Laws in the context of fluids. The test results showed that although students had some correct knowledge, they often failed to apply it correctly, especially in cases involving more than one object or in calculating the volume of displaced fluid. Based on these findings, the instrument was developed into six tested and validated items capable of comprehensively assessing students' reasoning abilities and conceptual understanding. This instrument can be used by educators to diagnose and correct student misconceptions related to Archimedes' Law.
Keywords:
Archimedes' law Floating-sinking concept Instrument development Reasoning abilityReferences
Alatas, F. (2019). Developing Simple Teaching Aids On Static Fluid Material As A Learning Media For Physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v7i2.1749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v7i2.1749
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., & Haglund, J. (2015). Conceptual Metaphor and Embodied Cognition in Science Learning: Introduction to special issue. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025245
Araujo, R. F., Delamaro, M. E., & Maldonado, J. C. (2013). Functional test data generation for Simulink-like models. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 19(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13173-013-0104-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13173-013-0104-z
Barraood, S. O., Mohd, H., & Baharom, F. (2022). An initial investigation of the effect of quality factors on Agile test case quality through experts’ review. Cogent Engineering, 9(1), 2082121. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2082121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2082121
Carbajal, M. L., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2025). Enactive Interaction in Support of Creative Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(8), 4775–4800. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2353425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2353425
Castillo-Hernández, F.-J., Jiménez-Liso, M.-R., Couso, D., & López-Gay, R. (2025). Exploring the phenomena of floating and sinking in science education literature: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2025.2460927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2025.2460927
De Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Diyana, T. N., Sutopo, S., & Haryoto, D. (2020). The analysis of college students difficulty in acquiring static fluid concept. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v4i1.4113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v4i1.4113
Fernando, T. J., Parno, & Diantoro, M. (2024). Analysis of students’ scientific reasoning ability on static fluid topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2684(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2684/1/012003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2684/1/012003
Getie, A. S. (2020). Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1738184. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1738184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1738184
Han, Z., He, Q., & Von Davier, M. (2019). Predictive Feature Generation and Selection Using Process Data From PISA Interactive Problem-Solving Items: An Application of Random Forests. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02461
Hardy, I., Meschede, N., & Mannel, S. (2022). Measuring adaptive teaching in classroom discourse: Effects on student learning in elementary science education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1041316. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1041316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1041316
Irma, Z. U., Kusairi, S., & Yuliati, L. (2022). Level of Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Static Fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2392(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2392/1/012020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2392/1/012020
Kaltakci Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Kriek, J., & Legesse, A. (2023). The effects of the multiple representation approach on undergraduate students understanding of Archimedes Principle. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202322724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202322724
Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049
Maison, Hidayati, Kurniawan, D. A., & Fitriani, R. (2023). Using an Isomorphic Instrument: What Do Physics Education Students Think About Buoyance? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9937–9944. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5341
Naylor, D., & Tsai, S. S. H. (2022). Archimedes’ principle with surface tension effects in undergraduate fluid mechanics. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 50(3), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190211055431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190211055431
Neri, L., Noguez, J., Escobar-Castillejos, D., Robledo-Rella, V., García-Castelán, R. M. G., Gonzalez-Nucamendi, A., Magana, A. J., & Benes, B. (2024). Enhancing Buoyant force learning through a visuo-haptic environment: A case study. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 11, 1276027. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1276027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1276027
Nooritasari, D. D., Kusairi, S., & Wisodo, H. (2020). The exploration of mechanistic reasoning ability for high school students in static fluids. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1), 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012075
Paik, S., Song, G., Kim, S., & Ha, M. (2017). Developing a Four-level Learning Progression and Assessment for the Concept of Buoyancy. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00976a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00976a
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Radovanović, J., Sliško, J., & Stepanović Ilić, I. (2019). Active learning of buoyancy: An effective way to change students’ alternative conceptions about floating and sinking. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1286(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1286/1/012011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1286/1/012011
Richards, A. J., Jones, D. C., & Etkina, E. (2020). How Students Combine Resources to Make Conceptual Breakthroughs. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1119–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9725-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9725-8
Saputra, H., & Mustika, D. (2022). Analysis the Conceptual Understanding Level and Understanding Model of Pre-Service Physics Teacher. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2367–2372. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2246
Schantong, B., Siegmund, N., & Siegmund, J. (2025). Toward a theory on programmer’s block inspired by writer’s block. Empirical Software Engineering, 30(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10542-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10542-9
Schneider, M., & Simonsmeier, B. A. (2025). How does prior knowledge affect learning? A review of 16 mechanisms and a framework for future research. Learning and Individual Differences, 122, 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102744
Schwichow, M., & Zoupidis, A. (2024). Teaching and learning floating and sinking: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(2), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21909
Shishigu, A., Hailu, A., & Anibo, Z. (2017). Problem-Based Learning and Conceptual Understanding of College Female Students in Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78035
Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2022). The Effect of an Instructional Intervention Based on the Use of Video-Worked Examples to Promote Elementary Students’ Science Process Skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(3), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2158
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Taurusi, T. (2021). Improving conceptual understanding on temperature and heat through modeling instruction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), 052054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052054
Taqwa, M. R. A., Febriyanto, A. M., & Misbakhussuduri, A. (2024). Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Berbasis Multimedia dengan Asesmen Formatif pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan (INTERN), 1(2), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.58466/intern.v1i2.1394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58466/intern.v1i2.1394
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., & De Vries, M. J. (2020). The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446
Wagner, D. J., Carbone, E., & Lindow, A. (2014). Exploring Student Difficulties with Buoyancy. 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.077
Wambugu, P. W., & Changeiywo, J. M. (2008). Effects of Mastery LearningApproach on Secondary SchoolStudents’ Physics Achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75352
Weißenfels, M., Hoffmann, D., Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, L., & Perels, F. (2023). Linking academic buoyancy and math achievement in secondary school students: Does academic self-efficacy play a role? Current Psychology, 42(27), 23422–23436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03488-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03488-y
Zoupidis, A., Spyrtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., & Kariotoglou, P. (2021). Teaching and Learning Floating and Sinking: Didactic Transformation in a Density-Based Approach. Fluids, 6(4), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6040158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6040158
Zulfa, S. I., Nikmah, A., & Nisak, E. K. (2020). Analisa Penguasaan Konsep pada Tekanan Hidrostatis dan Hukum Pascal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika. Jurnal Fisika Indonesia, 24(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.22146/jfi.v24i1.51870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jfi.v24i1.51870
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luh Sukariasih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
