Analysis Level of Interest in The Last Planner System (LPS) and Factors Influencing The Level of its Implementation
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i12.13477Published:
2025-12-25Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the factors influencing the difficulty of implementing the Last Planner System (LPS) among contractors in Malang City. A quantitative approach was employed through questionnaires distributed to contractors involved in construction projects, supported by interviews to validate field findings. The data were analyzed using descriptive techniques and factor weighting to identify the variables that most significantly affect the challenges of LPS implementation. The results indicate that four major factors contribute to the level of difficulty in applying LPS: limited understanding and competence of human resources, lack of management support and commitment, weak coordination and communication among project teams, and resistance to organizational cultural change. The most influential factors are managerial and organizational behavioral aspects, particularly related to management commitment and readiness for collaborative work culture. These findings confirm that successful LPS implementation relies not only on technical tools but also on organizational readiness to adopt a culture of collaboration, transparency, and accountability. The study recommends strengthening human resource capacity, enhancing managerial support, optimizing routine coordination, and transforming organizational culture to improve the effectiveness of LPS implementation in Malang City.
Keywords:
Collaboration Communication Cultural change Human resources Last Planner SystemReferences
Abdelalim, A. M., Salem, M., Salem, M., Al-Adwani, M., & Tantawy, M. (2025). An analysis of factors contributing to cost overruns in the global construction industry. Buildings, 15(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15010018
Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S. A. (2024). Reliability analysis: application of cronbach’s alpha in research instruments. Pioneering the Future: Delving Into E-Learning’s Landscape, 114–119. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/mCz2w
Akanbi, O. A., Oyedolapo, O., & Steven, G. J. (2019). Lean principles in construction. In Sustainable construction technologies (pp. 317–348). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811749-1.00010-9
Alumran, A., Hou, X.-Y., & Hurst, C. (2012). Validity and reliability of instruments designed to measure factors influencing the overuse of antibiotics. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 5(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2012.03.003
Ballard, G., & Tommelein, I. (2021). 2020 Current process benchmark for the last planner (R) system of project planning and control. Open Access Publications from the University of California. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5t90q8q9
Ballard, H. G. (2000). The last planner system of production control [University of Birmingham]. Retrieved from https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/4789/
Dadashnejad, A.-A., & Valmohammadi, C. (2019). Investigating the effect of value stream mapping on overall equipment effectiveness: a case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(3–4), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1308821
Damayanti, R. W., Hartono, B., & Wijaya, A. R. (2021). Project managers’ perspectives on the complexity of construction megaproject in Indonesia: a multicase study. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 49(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2021.3063812
El-Sabek, L. M., & McCabe, B. Y. (2018). Framework for managing integration challenges of last planner system in IMPs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5), 4018022. https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001468
Fernandez-Solis, J. L., Porwal, V., Lavy, S., Shafaat, A., Rybkowski, Z. K., Son, K., & Lagoo, N. (2013). Survey of motivations, benefits, and implementation challenges of last planner system users. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000606
Gottems, L. B. D., Carvalho, E. M. P. De, Guilhem, D., & Pires, M. R. G. M. (2018). Good practices in normal childbirth: reliability analysis of an instrument by Cronbach’s Alpha. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 26, e3000. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2234.3000
Kilic, S. (2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 47. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/JaFv0
Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the new production philosophy to construction (Vol. 72, Issue 39). Stanford university Stanford.
Malapane, T. A., & Ndlovu, N. K. (2024). Assessing the reliability of Likert scale statements in an e-commerce quantitative study: A Cronbach alpha analysis using SPSS Statistics. 2024 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS61124.2024.10534753
Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
Ojinta, P. E., & Enyinna, G. C. (2025). Evaluation of the Application of Last Planner System in Construction Projects. International Journal, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2025/041392025
Pereira, P., Cachadinha, N., Zegarra, O., & Alarcón, L. (2013). Bullwhip effect in production control a comparison between traditional methods and LPS. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Fortaleza, Brasil. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/8f7Q4
Perez, A. M., & Ghosh, S. (2018). Barriers faced by new-adopter of Last Planner System®: a case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(9), 1110–1126. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2017-0162
Power, W., Sinnott, D., & Lynch, P. (2021). Evaluating the efficacy of a dedicated last planner system facilitator to enhance construction productivity. Construction Economics and Building, 21(3), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.146076827100606
Sanusi, B. O. (2024). The Role of Data-Driven Decision-Making in Reducing Project Delays and Cost Overruns in Civil Engineering Projects. SAMRIDDHI: A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 16(04), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.18090/samriddhi.v16i04.08
Shehab, L., Al Hattab, M., Khalife, S., El Samad, G., Abbas, Y., & Hamzeh, F. (2023). Last Planner System framework to assess planning reliability in architectural design. Buildings, 13(11), 2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112684
Singh, J. (2025). Lean Construction Principles and Practices. In Handbook of Construction Project Management (pp. 941–968). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7631-6_30
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-016-9602-2
Warid, O., & Hamani, K. (2023). Lean Construction in the UAE: Implementation of Last Planner System®. Lean Construction Journal, 2023, 1–20. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/y2Ygs
Xiao, X., Ye, Q., & Dong, X. (2024). Using importance--performance analysis to reveal priorities for multifunctional landscape optimization in urban parks. Land, 13(5), 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050564
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Amin Rais, Imam Alfianto, Apif Miptahul Hajji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
