Students’ Misconceptions and Mental Models about Floating, Suspension, and Sinking: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i3.13762Published:
2026-03-31Downloads
Abstract
This systematic literature review examined research on students’ misconceptions and mental models related to floating, suspending, and sinking (FSS) concepts published between 1990 and 2026. The review aims to map research themes, major forms of misconceptions, classifications of mental models, and instructional interventions used to support scientific understanding. The review implemented the PRISMA framework to identify, screen, and ensure the eligibility of the articles. A total of 215 articles met the inclusion criteria. Findings show that misconceptions remain the most investigated aspect, particularly those involving confusion among density, mass, volume, and buoyant force. Research on mental models is still limited, revealing that many learners rely on initial or synthetic, context-dependent representations rather than scientific models. Instructional interventions are the most extensively and widely investigated, including hands-on activities, conceptual change strategies, simulations, and structured learning models, each contributing differently to addressing misconceptions and promoting scientific mental models about FSS phenomena. Overall, the review highlights persistent conceptual difficulties, insufficient assessment tools, and a need for more integrative research that connects misconceptions, mental models, reasoning, and diagnostic measurement. Strengthening appropriate interventions will support deeper insights into learners’ scientific understanding and mental models of FSS concepts.
Keywords:
Floating Mental model Misconception Sinking SuspendingReferences
Atmaja, D. Y. S., & Samsudin, A. (2024). Are there misconceptions in my class? Misconception analysis with T3-SF (Three Tier-Test on Static Fluid). Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 13(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v13i2.13518
Bessas, N., Tzanaki, E., Vavougios, D., & Plagianakos, V. P. (2024). Inquiring students’ alternative conceptions about floating and sinking objects. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(7), 74–102. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i7.48907
Busyairi, A., & Zuhdi, M. (2024). Profile of Student Misconceptions on Static Fluids: A Meta-Analysis Study. Kappa Journal, 8(3), 476-484. https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v8i3.2843
Castillo, R. D., Waltzer, T., & Kloos, H. (2017). Hands-on experience can lead to systematic mistakes: A study on adults’ understanding of sinking objects. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0061-8
Castillo-Hernández, F. J., Jiménez-Liso, M. R., Couso, D., & López-Gay, R. (2025). Exploring the phenomena of floating and sinking in science education literature: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2025.2460927
Çepni, S., Şahin, Ç., & Ipek, H. (2010). Teaching floating and sinking concepts with different methods and techniques based on the 5E instructional model. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1–16. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ933453
Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change. In Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_1
Chien, S., Hsiung, C., & Chen, S. (2009). The development of young children’s science-related concept regarding floating and sinking. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 3(2), 73–88. Retrieved from https://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/article/detail/4050025429902
Chirayangyuenyong, S., Emarat, N., & Arayathanitkul, K. (2023). Question–answer teaching method to develop students’ understanding of buoyant force. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2431(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2431/1/012011
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an Epistemology of Physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
Dorji, U. (2021). Misconception on floating and sinking. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003) Conceptual Change: A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
Gao, Y., Zhai, X., Cui, Y., Xin, T., & Bulut, O. (2021). Re-validating a learning progression of buoyancy for middle school students: A longitudinal study. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10021
Gette, C. R., Kryjevskaia, M., Stetzer, M. R., & Heron, P. R. L. (2018). Probing student reasoning approaches through the lens of dual-process theories: A case study in buoyancy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010113
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Learning science through models and modeling. In The international handbook of science education (pp. 53-66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ginting, F. W., Sakdiah, H., Rose, J., & Febrianty, N. (2023). Pengembangan four-tier diagnostic test untuk menganalisis kemampuan konsepsi siswa pada fluida statis. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v7i1.3442
Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289976
Gustina, G., Mansyur, J., Laratu, W. N., & Tule, R. (2024). Mental models based on students’ thinking style about objects in static fluid. Journal of Research in Science Education. Retrieved from https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa
Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19520
Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or P-Prims: How May Alternative Perspectives of Cognitive Structure Influence Instructional Perceptions and Intentions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1
Harrell, P. E., Kirby, B., Subramaniam, K., & Long, C. (2022). Are elementary preservice teachers floating or sinking in their understanding of buoyancy? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10160-7
Hestenes, D. (2010). Modeling Theory for Math and Science Education. In Modeling Students' Mathematical Modeling Competencies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1_3
Jackson, A. (2021). Design principles as cultural artifacts: Pedagogical improvisation and the bridging of critical theory and teaching practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2021.1882500
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kafiyani, F., Samsudin, A., & Saepuzaman, D. (2019). Development of four-tier diagnostic test to identify students’ mental models on static fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052030
Kaharu, S. N. & Mansyur, J. (2021). The development of a test to explore the students’ mental models and external representation patterns of hanging objects. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.18.4.01
Kamilah, D. S., Muki, B. G., Aviyanti, L., & Suhandi, A. (2025). Review of misconceptions in physics among Indonesian high school students: Diagnosis, causes, and remediation. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 9(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v9i2.11187
Kim, S., & Paik, S.-H. (2021). Archimedes’ balance approach applied to buoyant force. The Physics Teacher, 59(2), 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0003469
Kiray, S. A., Aktan, F., Kaynar, H., Kilinc, S., & Gorkemli, T. (2015). A descriptive study of pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions about sinking–floating. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 1. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1096070
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. Norwood: Ablex.
Leuchter, M., & Saalbach. (2014). Designing science learning in the first years of schooling: An intervention study with sequenced learning material on floating and sinking. International Journal of Science Education, 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.878482
Maknun, J. & Marwiah, M. (2022). Remediation of Misconceptions Vocational High School Students on the Concept of Static Fluids using the Conceptual Change Model. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(2), 49-56. Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/12009
Mamontsuoe, J. L., Maraisane, L. C., & Jita, T. (2024). The notions of floating and sinking: Exploring the conceptual knowledge of Grade R teachers. South African Journal of Childhood Education. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1407
Mansyur, J., Werdhiana, I.K., Darsikin, D., and Kaharu, S.N. (2022). Students’ mental models about the suspending objects in static fluid, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.121
McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 67, 755-767.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19122
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
Minogue, J., & Borland, D. (2016). Investigating students’ ideas about buoyancy and the influence of haptic feedback. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9585-1
Minogue, J., Borland, D., Russo, M., Chen, S. T., & Grady, R. (2015). Investigating the influence of haptic technology on upper elementary students’ reasoning about sinking and floating. Annual International Conference, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9585-1
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA, 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The British Medical Journal, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pratamawati. (2024). The exploration of early childhood science through daily equipment: A study at Nurul Huda Yapis Kindergarten, Keerom Regency. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Golden Age Education, 5(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.32332/ijigaed.v5i1.9527
Radovanović, J., & Sliško, J. (2013). Applying a predict–observe–explain sequence in teaching of buoyant force. Physics Education, 48(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/1/28
Saputra, O. (2022). Development of virtual simulation to reduce the number of high school students' misconceptions about fluid topics. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 12(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v12n1.p100-107
Sarini, P. & Selamet, K. (2022). Miskonsepsi siswa pada materi fluida statis dan model pembelajaran predict–observe–explain sebagai alternatif meremediasi miskonsepsi. Jurnal IPA Terpadu, 6(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.35580/ipaterpadu.v5i2.31289
Schwichow, M., & Zoupidis, A. (2024). Teaching and learning floating and sinking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(2),
487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21909
Sholahuddin, S., Rusnayati, H., & Suyana, I. (2019). Profil Miskonsepsi Siswa Berdasarkan Hasil Tes Diagnostik Four Tier Test pada Materi Fluida Statis. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 194-199. https://doi.org/10.17509/WAPFI.V4I2.20201
Skoumios, M. (2009). The effect of sociocognitive conflict on students’ dialogic argumentation about floating and sinking. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(4), 381–399. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ884404
Sukariasih, L., Sutopo, Handayanto, S. K., & Panre, A. M. (2024). Students’ reasoning about float, suspend, and sink: The role of Newton’s laws. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/vz6qxm52
Teo, T. W., Yan, Y. K., & Ong, W. L. M. (2017). An investigation of Singapore preschool children’s emerging concepts of floating and sinking. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12(4), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1374186
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4
Unal. (2008). Changing students’ misconceptions of floating and sinking using hands-on activities. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(3). Retrieved from https://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1404719938.pdf
Verawahyuni, H. (2022). Implementation of the guided inquiry learning model to reduce misconceptions of static fluid materials among students of State Junior High School 19 Samarinda in the 2019/2020 academic year. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v7n1.p1-9
Viyanti, V., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Prastyo, Z. K. (2017). The development of rubric skills argued as alternative assessment for floating and sinking materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012057
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
Wicaksono, S. R., Bukifan, D., & Kusairi, S. (2019). Pemahaman konsep fluida statis siswa SMA dan kesulitan yang dialami. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 7(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v7i1.22380
Wongsuwan, W., & Huntula, J. (2019, November). The students’ basic conceptions of buoyant force. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1380, No. 1, p. 012139). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012139
Wongsuwan, W., Huntula, J., & Liu, C.-C. (2021). The interactive computer simulation and learning activity for facilitating students’ conceptual understanding on the buoyant force. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2145, 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2145/1/012075
Yin, Y., Tomita, M., & Shavelson, R. (2008). Diagnosing and dealing with student misconceptions: Floating and sinking. Science Scope, 31(8), 34–39. https://michellesclassroom.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/diagnosing-and-dealing-with-student-misconceptions.pdf
Zoupidis, A., Spyrtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., & Kariotoglou, P. (2021). Teaching and learning floating and sinking: Didactic transformation in a density-based approach. Fluids, 6(158). https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6040158
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarintan Nurcahyati Kaharu, Citra Dewi, Ni Putu Murniasih, Nunuk Haryanti, Supriyatman, Afadil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
