Latent Profile Analysis of Student Engagement in STEM-Integrated Calculus Education for Character Development and Academic Achievement: A Study Toward SDG 4 in Indonesian Higher Education
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13827Published:
2026-01-25Downloads
Abstract
This study employed Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to investigate engagement patterns among Indonesian university students (N = 81) in a calculus course integrated with STEM through engineering case studies and digital tools. A cross-sectional design using a multidimensional engagement questionnaire identified three distinct profiles: Highly Engaged Digital Learners (22.20%), Minimally Engaged Learners (3.70%), and Moderately Engaged Learners Requiring Support (74.10%). ANOVA results revealed that Highly Engaged Digital Learners achieved significantly superior calculus performance (mean score = 89.70) compared to other profiles (mean difference = 17.30 points, p < 0.001). MANOVA further indicated that this group demonstrated substantially greater development of character virtues, including perseverance, intellectual honesty, and collaborative ethics (all p < 0.001). The findings confirm that STEM-integrated calculus education, when effectively engaging students, serves a dual pedagogical function, simultaneously advancing technical competencies and ethical reasoning. This highlights its transformative potential in fostering holistically developed professionals, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education). Strategic educational responses should include early engagement profiling and targeted support to maximize these benefits.
Keywords:
Calculus learning Character development Digital learning engagement Latent profile STEMReferences
Bergman, L. R., & Trost, K. (2006). The Person-Oriented Versus the Variable-Oriented Approach: Are They Complementary, Opposites, or Exploring Different Worlds? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 601–632. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0023
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the Use of Evidence‐Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bressoud, D. (2015). Insights from the MAA National Study of College Calculus. The Mathematics Teacher, 109(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.3.0178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.3.0178
Caruth, G. (2016). Today’s College Students: Who Are They and What Do They Require from a College Education? International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 3(1), 34–46. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijcer/article/279957
Council, N. A. of E. and N. R. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Creswell, J. W. ., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2013). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. Handbook of mixed methods research designs, 1(1), 21-36. Retrieved from https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5730651#page=56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529614572.n6
Effendi, E., Sriyanti, I., Wiyono, K., Marlina, L., & Rosdiana, R. (2025). Ethno-STEM in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review (2020–2025) on Trends, Classroom Challenges, and Teacher Capacity in a Multicultural Context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(10), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12281
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gusman, T. A., Novitasari, N., & Yulina, I. K. (2023). Effect of STEM Integrated Problem-Based Learning Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8911–8917. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5163
Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6
Holik, I., Sanda, I. D., & Molnár, G. (2023). The necessity of developing soft skills in STEM areas in higher education, with special focus on engineering training. Athens Journal of Technology and Engineering, 10(4), 199–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30958/ajte.10-4-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/ajte.10-4-1
Honey, M., Greg Pearson, & Schweingruber, H. (2014). The future of TE masters degrees: STEM. In 70th Annual International Technology Education Association Conference. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18612/stem-integration-in-k-12-education-status-prospects-and-an
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical Latent Profile Analysis of Academic Self-Concept Dimensions: Synergy of Person- and Variable-Centered Approaches to Theoretical Models of Self-Concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010
Martin, D. P., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math? Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001
Monika, P. S., Suharno, S., & Rahmasari, L. (2023). Effectiveness of Science Technology Engineering Mathematics Problem Based Learning (STEM PBL) and Science Technology Engineering Mathematics Project Based Learning (STEM PjBL) to Improve Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9593–9599. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4910
Morin, A. J. S., Meyer, J. P., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016). Multiple-Group Analysis of Similarity in Latent Profile Solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621148
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Prastika, L. R., Setiawan, R., Safitra, Z., & Harisbaya, A. I. (2024). Implementation of Professional Development Programs for Science Teachers and Education Personnel in STEM Learning (Case Study in Indonesia). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 9(5), 5. Retrieved from https://citeus.um.ac.id/jptpp/vol9/iss5/5/
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10919/51616
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
Sokolowski, A., Li, Y., & Willson, V. (2015). The effects of using exploratory computerized environments in grades 1 to 8 mathematics: a meta-analysis of research. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0022-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0022-z
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120(103445), 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Taqiyyah, S. A., Subali, B. S., Linuwih, S., Ellianawati, Siswanto, & Yusof, M. M. bin M. (2023). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis Android dengan Pendekatan STEM untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11151–11164. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4595
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2024). Unpacking the role of AI ethics online education for science and engineering students. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00493-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00493-4
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, M., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying Engaged: Knowledge and Research Needs in Student Engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073
Zulirfan, Z., & Yennita, Y. (2022). Feasibility test of STEM at home prototype kit as science project-based learning media for Junior High School students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1122
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Deby Erdriani, Zelhendri Zen, Fetri Yeni, Mahdalena Prihatin Ningsih, Ega Harna B, Firmawati, Helmiyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
