Vol. 12 No. 4 (2026): In Progress
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Enhancing Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Elasticity and Hooke’s Law Through PhET-Supported Guided Inquiry Learning: A Constructivist and Cognitive Load Perspective

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v12i4.13883

Published:

2026-05-11

Downloads

Abstract

The rapid transformation of science education in the digital era calls for pedagogical innovations that promote deep conceptual understanding rather than rote memorization. This study aims to investigate the effect of integrating PhET interactive simulations into a guided inquiry learning model on students’ conceptual understanding of elasticity and Hooke’s Law. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was employed with 55 eleventh-grade science students at SMA Frater Don Bosco Lewoleba, Indonesia. The experimental group experienced PhET-supported guided inquiry, while the control group received guided inquiry instruction with real demonstration tools. Statistical analysis revealed that students in the experimental group achieved significantly higher posttest scores than those in the control group (t(53) = 2.89, p = 0.01), with a medium-to-high effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.67). The findings suggest that PhET interactive simulations function as cognitive scaffolds by visualizing abstract physical phenomena, reducing extraneous cognitive load, and supporting conceptual reconstruction during inquiry activities. These results highlight the pedagogical value of embedding digital simulations within inquiry-based physics instruction to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and foster meaningful learning in abstract scientific domains.

Keywords:

Cognitive load theory Conceptual understanding Constructivist Elasticity Guided inquiry Hooke’s law PhET

References

Adauyah, R., & Aznam, N. (2024). Guided Inquiry Learning Model in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6373

Azizaturredha, M., Fatmawati, S., & Yuliani, H. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Media Laboratorium Virtual (PhET) untuk meningkatkan Hasil Belajar, Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Minat Belajar Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Elastisitas. EduFisika, 4(01), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22437/edufisika.v4i01.6051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/edufisika.v4i01.6051

Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Using Mobile Devices to Enhance Inquiry-Based Learning Processes. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. BSCS.

Chen, F., & Chen, G. (2025). Learning Analytics in Inquiry-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(4), 2131–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10507-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10507-9

Darwis, R., & Hardiansyah, M. R. (2023). Effect of PhET Virtual Laboratory Implementation on Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1922–1928. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1979

Espinoza, F. (2020). Impact of Guided Inquiry with Simulations on Knowledge of Electricity and Wave Phenomena. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 16(33), 1. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n33p1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n33p1

Fadillah, M. A., Alawyah, K., Syafrijon, S., & Usmeldi, U. (2026). Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of PhET Simulations in Physics Education. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (IJOE), 22(02), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v22i02.59007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v22i02.59007

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hadi, D. F., Doyan, A., ‘Ardhuha, J., & Harjono, A. (2023). Influence of the PhET Simulation-Assisted Project-Based Learning Model on Students’ Ability to Master the Elasticity Concept. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1840–1845. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3626

Hendratmoko, A. F., Madlazim, M., Widodo, W., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2023). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Online Learning with Virtual Laboratories on Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1129263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1129263

Khairunnastuti, F., Ismet, I., & Ketang, W. (2026). The Effect of Using PhET Simulation in E-Modules on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Electromagnetism. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 309–415. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13560

Kousloglou, M., Petridou, E., Molohidis, A., & Hatzikraniotis, E. (2023). Assessing Students’ Awareness of 4Cs Skills after Mobile-Technology-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning. Sustainability, 15(8), 6725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086725

Kurnaz, M. A., & Arslan, A. (2021). Students’ Misconceptions About Elasticity and Hooke’s Law. Physics Education, 56(4), 45012.

Liew, C. W., & Treagust, D. F. (2022). Conceptual Understanding in Science Education: Linking Representations, Inquiry, and Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 44(6), 889–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2032036

Ma’ruf, A. D. S. (2024). Analysis of Physics Misconceptions on Elasticity and Hooke’s Law in High School Students Using the Certainty of Response Index Method. Galore International Journal of Applied Sciences & Humanities, 8(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.52403/gijash.20240202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/gijash.20240202

Mahzum, E., Halim, A., Usfia, N., & Herliana, F. (2024). The Effect of Using PhET Simulation-Based Virtual Labs on Students’ Analytical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2238–2242. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.4791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.4791

Marwanti, K., Marina, D., & Astra, I. M. (2024). Increasing Scientific Literacy Using a Guided Inquiry Approach Assisted by PhET Simulations in Wave Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 15(4), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v15i4.715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v15i4.715

Maubuthy, M. S. K., Supu, A., Bani, M. D. S., Sukarjita, I. W., Jewaru, A. A. L., & Tefa, M. (2025). Development of an Interactive Multimedia-Based Science Practicum Guide on Dynamic Electricity. Experiment: Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.18860/experiment.v5i2.32781

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355

Ouwehand, K., Lespiau, F., Tricot, A., & Paas, F. (2025). Cognitive Load Theory: Emerging Trends and Innovations. Education Sciences, 15(4), 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040458

Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. (2006). PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. The Physics Teacher, 44(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2150754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2150754

Pranata, O. D. (2024). Physics Education Technology (PhET) as a Game-Based Learning Tool: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Pedagogical Research, 9(4), em0221. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15154

Pratiwi, N. K. R., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., & Pujani, N. M. (2025). Utilizing PhET Simulator in Guided Inquiry Learning to Enhance Students Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(10), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.11368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.11368

Putri, D. H., Permanasari, A., Winarno, N., & Ahmad, N. J. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Scientific Literacy Using Virtual Lab Activity with Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.27561

Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9291-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9291-6

Rafiah, J. A., & Miyaqi, I. A. (2025). Analyze the Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Elasticity and Hooke’s Law Using the Rasch Model. Impulse: Journal of Research and Innovation in Physics Education, 5(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2025.51-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2025.51-06

Sam, R. (2024). Systematic Review of Inquiry-Based Learning: Assessing Impact and Best Practices in Education. F1000Research, 13, 1045. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1

Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2019). Implementation of Game-Transformed Inquiry-based Learning to Promote the Understanding of and Motivation to Learn Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0

Sukardiyono, S., Perdana, R., Putriana, R., Pradana, P. W., & Jumadi, J. (2025). The Effectiveness of the Phet-Assisted Learning Cycle 5E Model to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Science Literacy on the Topic of Sound Waves. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(7), 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.10902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.10902

Susilawati, A., Yusrizal, Y., Halim, A., Syukri, M., Khaldun, I., & Susanna, S. (2022). Effect of Using Physics Education Technology (PhET) Simulation Media to Enhance Students’ Motivation and Problem-Solving Skills in Learning Physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1571

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive Load Theory and Educational Technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive Load Theory and Individual Differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423

Tawfik, A. A., Hung, W., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (2020). Comparing How Different Inquiry-Based Approaches Impact Learning Outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28624

Tytler, R. (2020). STEM Education for the Twenty-First Century. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23776-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3

Umiliya, U., Wati, A., & Mahadi, I. (2023). The Effectiveness of the Application of PhET with Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Understanding of the Concept. Journal of Science Education Research, 7(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v7i2.59148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v7i2.59148

Villaruel, S. A. L. (2025). Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulations in Learning Selected Topics in Physics among College Students. American Journal of Education and Technology, 4(3), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v4i3.4512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v4i3.4512

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of Using Inquiry-Based Learning on EFL Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2

Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948

Willard, C. T. (2021). The Effect of PhET Simulation vs. Phenomenon-Based Experiential Learning on Students’ Integration of Motion Along Two Independent Axes in Projectile Motion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1969739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1969739

Zourmpakis, A.-I., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2024). The Effects of Adaptive Gamification in Science Learning: A Comparison between Traditional Inquiry-Based Learning and Gender Differences. Computers, 13(12), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13120324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13120324

Author Biographies

Antonius Suban Hali, Universitas Nusa Cendana

Author Origin : Indonesia

Francisca R. H Bokilia, Universitas Nusa Cendana

Author Origin : Indonesia

Vinsensius Lantik, Universitas Nusa Cendana

Author Origin : Indonesia

Amiruddin Supu, Universitas Nusa Cendana

Author Origin : Indonesia

Markus Simeon K. Maubuthy, Nusa Cendana University

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Hali, A. S., Bokilia, F. R. H., Lantik, V., Supu, A., & Maubuthy, M. S. K. (2026). Enhancing Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Elasticity and Hooke’s Law Through PhET-Supported Guided Inquiry Learning: A Constructivist and Cognitive Load Perspective. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i4.13883