Empowering Prospective Biology Teachers: Implementing UDL-Integrated Digital Competencies in Invertebrate Taxonomy at Cenderawasih University
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i1.13895Published:
2026-01-25Downloads
Abstract
This quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group study examined the effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) integrated with digital competence in improving invertebrate taxonomy learning among third-semester Biology Education students at FKIP Cenderawasih University. Participants included 54 students from two classes: the experimental (n=27) receiving 6-week UDL-digital intervention and the control group (n=27) following conventional PowerPoint lectures. The intervention applied UDL principles: Multiple Means of Representation via e-modules, 3D animations, and infographics; Action/Expression through digital portfolios, videos, and quizzes; and Engagement via LMS feedback. Quantitative data were collected through tests of conceptual mastery, digital competence assessments, and classroom engagement observations, while qualitative data were obtained from student questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that students exposed to the UDL-digital approach achieved higher conceptual understanding, demonstrated stronger digital competence, and showed greater engagement than those in the control group. Qualitative results supported these outcomes, revealing that multimodal access facilitated understanding of complex taxonomy concepts, flexible digital expression enhanced self-efficacy, and gamified learning environments increased intrinsic motivation, particularly when learning was contextualized using local biodiversity. Overall, the study confirms the potential of UDL integrated with digital competence as an effective and inclusive pedagogical framework for STEM teacher education. The findings suggest that UDL-digital learning designs are particularly relevant for resource-constrained higher education contexts and can contribute to preparing future biology teachers who are both pedagogically adaptive and digitally competent.
Keywords:
Digital Competence Papua Universal design for learningReferences
Agbo, I. S. (2015). Factors Influencing the Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Teaching and Learning Computer Studies in Ohaukwu Local Government Area of Ebonyi State-Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(7), 71–86. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083136
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A Content Analysis of Peer Reviewed Journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191
AlRawi, J. M., & AlKahtani, M. A. (2022). Universal design for learning for educating students with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68(6), 800–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2021.1900505
Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L.-A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
Baybayon, G. (2021). The Use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Framework in Teaching and Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Academia Letters. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL692
Beck Wells, M. (2022). Student perspectives on the use of universal design for learning in virtual formats in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00218-6
Carretero, G., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of Use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/38842
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. Center for Applied Special Technology. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/43UdUcU
Cumming, T. M., & Rose, M. C. (2022). Exploring universal design for learning as an accessibility tool in higher education: a review of the current literature. The Australian Educational Researcher, 49(5), 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00471-7
Dean, T., Lee-Post, A., & Hapke, H. (2017). Universal Design for Learning in Teaching Large Lecture Classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475316662104
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
Fornauf, B. S., & Erickson, J. D. (2020). Toward an inclusive pedagogy through Universal Design for Learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Postsecondary Education and Disability, 33(2), 183–199. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1273677
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Ghomi, M., & Redecker, C. (2019). Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu): Development and Evaluation of a Self-assessment Instrument for Teachers’ Digital Competence. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 541–548. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007679005410548
Hasan, M. I. (2002). Pokok-pokok materi metodologi penelitian dan aplikasinya. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hyatt, S. E., & Owenz, M. B. (2024). Using Universal Design for Learning and Artificial Intelligence to Support Students with Disabilities. College Teaching, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2024.2313468
Jasman, M. W., Sulisetijono, S., & Mahanal, S. (2024). Flipped classroom strategies in biology learning: A systematic literature review. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(1), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.32298
Kareem, A. A. (2018). The use of Multimedia in Teaching Biology and Its Impact on Students’ Learning Outcomes. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 9, 157–165. Retrieved from http://www.epess.net/en/pub/issue/38900/457937
Kirsch, B., & Luo, T. (2023). Universal Design for Learning Implementation in Higher Education: Survey of Faculty and Instructional Designers. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design. https://doi.org/10.59668/806.13414
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lohmann, M. J., Boothe, K. A., Hathcote, A. R., & Turpin, A. (2018). Engaging Graduate Students in the Online Learning Environment: A Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Approach to Teacher Preparation. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 20(2), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1264
Magfirah, N., Anisa, Hambali, H., Thahir, R., & Nurdiyanti. (2025). Digital Literacy in Indonesian Biology Education (2020–2025): A Research Synthesis Over One Lustrun, Methodological Critique, and Strategic Roadmap. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(8), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.12068
Mahlow, C., & Hediger, A. (2019). Digital Transformation in Higher Education—Buzzword or Opportunity? ELearn, 2019(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3329488/3331171
Mena-Guacas, A. F., Meza-Morales, J. A., Fernández, E., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Digital Collaboration in Higher Education: A Study of Digital Skills and Collaborative Attitudes in Students from Diverse Universities. Education Sciences, 14(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010036
Nasri, N., Rahimi, N. M., Nasri, N. M., & Talib, M. A. A. (2021). A Comparison Study between Universal Design for Learning-Multiple Intelligence (UDL-MI) Oriented STEM Program and Traditional STEM Program for Inclusive Education. Sustainability, 13(2), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020554
Nurbaya. (2024a). Digital Competence: A Study from the Prospective Biology Teachers in Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 1486–1494. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.5055
Nurbaya. (2024b). ICT Skills for Future Professional Performance of Biology Education Students of Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 3815–3826. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7208
Nurbaya, Listiani, H., & Mustaqimah, N. (2022). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Lingkungan dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mata pelajaran IPA Pada Siswa SMP Negeri 13 Bontoa. Jurnal Biotek, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v10i2.33704
Nurbaya, N. (2023). Identifying Prospective Biology Teachers’ Digital Literacy Competence at Cenderawasih University. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10051–10058. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4908
Pegalajar Palomino, M. del C., & Rodríguez Torres, Á. F. (2023). Digital literacy in university students of education degrees in Ecuador. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1299059
Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770.
Rogers-Shaw, C., Carr-Chellman, D. J., & Choi, J. (2018). Universal Design for Learning: Guidelines for Accessible Online Instruction. Adult Learning, 29(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159517735530
Seymour, M. (2024). Enhancing the online student experience through the application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to research methods learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2767–2785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11948-6
Silva-Quiroz, J., & Morales-Morgado, E. M. (2022). Assessing digital competence and its relationship with the socioeconomic level of Chilean university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00346-6
Smith, C. C., Cihak, D. F., Kim, B., McMahon, D. D., & Wright, R. (2017). Examining Augmented Reality to Improve Navigation Skills in Postsecondary Students With Intellectual Disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681159
Sudaryono. (2017). Metode penelitian. Depok : Raja Grafindo Persada.
Taiwo, S. K., & Emeke, E. A. (2014). Relationship among learning style preference, gender, age and students’ achievement in senior secondary school biology. West African Journal of Education, 34.
Veytia Bucheli, M. G., Gómez-Galán, J., Cáceres Mesa, M. L., & López Catalán, L. (2024). Digital technologies as enablers of universal design for learning: higher education students’ perceptions in the context of SDG4. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00699-0
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S., & Van Den Brande, L. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digi- tal Competence Framework for Citizens, Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Publication Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2791/11517
Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurbaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
