Monopolar Multi Frequency Electrosurgery Unit Design
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1426Published:
2022-04-30Downloads
Abstract
Electrosurgery Unit (ESU) is a medical surgical device that uses high frequency and high voltage with the aim that the patient does not experience excessive bleeding during the operation process. The development of electrosurgery unit technology evolves over time from monopolar to bipolar. However, in the development of the use of the tool, monopolar technology is always the most widely used in tissue surgery techniques. For this reason, this research was determined to use only the Monopolar principle. In Electrosurgery, the actual unit only uses one frequency selection, by changing (increasing or decreasing) the power value. With cases like this sometimes the user or equipment users will always change the power value during operation to determine the right power value. In this case, the author tries to make a prototype of an electrosurgery device with a frequency that can be selected (300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600 and 650 KHz) with a fixed power. By examining the results of the effectiveness of cutting (CUT) on tissue samples. It is hoped that it will be known which one is faster and more effective which can be used in cutting techniques (CUT) in surgeryKeywords:
Electrosurgery Monopolar Frekuensi CUTReferences
Benias, P. C., & Carr-Locke, D. L. (2019). Principles of Electrosurgery. Ercp, 86-92.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-48109-0.00011-0
Dafinescu, V., David, V., & Tutuianu, A. (2012). Electromagnetic emissions due to electrosurgery. EPE 2012 - Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering, 20(Epe), 525–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE.2012.6463880
Dodde, R. E., Gee, J. S., Geiger, J. D., & Shih, A. J. (2012). Monopolar electrosurgical thermal management for minimizing tissue damage. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59(1), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2168956
Eginli, A., Haidari, W., Farhangian, M., & Williford, P. M. (2021). Electrosurgery in dermatology. Clinics in Dermatology, 39(4), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.03.004
Gallagher, K., Dhinsa, B., & Miles, J. (2011). Electrosurgery. Surgery, 29(2), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2010.11.009
Karaki, W., Akyildiz, A., De, S., & Borca-Tasciuc, D. A. (2017). Energy dissipation in ex vivo porcine liver during electrosurgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64(6), 1211–1217. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2016.2595525
Knopf, C., Klockner, S., Liu, Z., Kanoun, O., & Himmel, J. (2013). Comparison of DAQ-methods to measure the potential distribution in electrosurgery. 2013 10th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, SSD 2013, 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2013.6564157
Livaditis, G. J. (2001). Comparison of monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical modes for restorative dentistry: A review of the literature. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 86(4), 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.118729
MacG Palmer, J. H. (2019). Surgical diathermy and electrical hazards: causes and prevention. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, 20(11), 609–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2019.09.011
Messenger, D., Carter, F., Noble, E., & Francis, N. (2020). Electrosurgery and energized dissection. Surgery (United Kingdom), 38(3), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2020.01.006
Salley, J. R., Johnson, R., Mitchell, R. B., Shah, G., & Coffey, A. R. (2022). Comparison of outcomes between thermal welding forceps, controlled ablation and monopolar electrosurgery for tonsillectomy in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 152(October 2021), 110941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110941
Taheri, A., Mansoori, P., Sandoval, L. F., Feldman, S. R., Pearce, D., & Williford, P. M. (2014). Electrosurgery: Part I. Basics and principles. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 70(4), 591.e1-591.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.056
Tokar, J. L., Barth, B. A., Banerjee, S., Chauhan, S. S., Gottlieb, K. T., Konda, V., Maple, J. T., Murad, F. M., Pfau, P. R., Pleskow, D. K., Siddiqui, U. D., Wang, A., & Rodriguez, S. A. (2013). Electrosurgical generators. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 78(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.164
Vilos, G. A., & Rajakumar, C. (2013). Electrosurgical Generators and Monopolar and Bipolar Electrosurgery. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 20(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.013
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dini Marhaeni Elecevani, Retno Wigajatri Purnamaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
