CTDBT Instruments to Measure The Critical Thinking Disposition Based on Gender in Biology Education Student

Authors

Jayanti Syahfitri , Harry Firman

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1650

Published:

2022-11-30

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): November

Keywords:

CTDBT, Critical Thinking Disposition, Gender, Biology Education

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Syahfitri, J., & Firman, H. . (2022). CTDBT Instruments to Measure The Critical Thinking Disposition Based on Gender in Biology Education Student. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2437–2442. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1650

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Critical thinking disposition is an important part of someone's critical thinking. This study aims to determine the differences in critical thinking dispositions of students in biology education based on gender. This research was conducted at Muhammadiyah of Bengkulu University involving 73 biology students as respondents, which is consisting of 19 male and 54 female. This research is a quasi-experimental type with one group. The instrument used in this study was the Critical Thinking Disposition in Biology Test (CTDBT), which is the first test instrument developed to see the critical thinking disposition in biology. The data obtained were analyzed through non-parametric statistics, namely the Mann-Withney test with the help of the SPSS version 20 application. The results showed that in general there was no significant difference in the disposition of biological critical thinking among male and female male and female students, except for the analyticity indicator. The results of this study can contribute to lecturers and stakeholders in making decisions to improve the quality of graduates at the University

 

References

Davies, M. (2015). A Model of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne Australia: Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2.

Demirhan, E., & Koklukaya, A. N. (2014). The critical thinking dispositions of prospective science teachers. Journal Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1551-1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.433

Facione, P.A., Giancarlo [Sanchez], C.A., Facione, N.C. & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. Journal of General Education, 44, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254

Facione, P. A., Facione, N. A., & Giancarlo, C. A. (1996). The motivation to think in working and learning: Defining Expectations for student learning. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Facione, P. A., Facione, N.C, & Giancarlo, C.A (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relation to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20, 61-84. Retrieved from https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2254

Giancarlo, C.A., & Facione, P.A. (2001). A Four Year Look at the Disposition toward Critical Thinking Among Undergraduate Students. The Journal of General Education, 50 (1), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2001.0004

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: The California Academy Press.

Facione, P. A., dan Giancarlo, C, A. (2013). Think Critically. Prentice-Hall.

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. www.insightassessment.com.

Fitriani, H., Asy'ri, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Critical thinking disposition of prospective science teachers at IKIP Mataram. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1108 (2018) 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012091

Foluso, O. (2014). Critical thinking dispositions of nursing faculty in Southwestern Nigeria International Journal of Research in Applied , Natural and Social Sciences (IMPACT:IJRANSS), 2, 127-134. http://www.impactjournals.us/download/archives/2-14-1409551634-16.Applied-Critical%20Thinking%20Dispositions%20Of%20Nursing%20Faculty%20In-Ojewole.pdf

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Herayanti, L., Husein, S., & Fathoroni, F. (2019). Investigating student’s critical thinking disposition based on gender in physic teaching with interactive multimedia. Journal Of Science Education Research, 9 (1), 1766–1771. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v9n1.p1766-1771

Marni, S., Aliman, M., Soeyono, Roekhan., & Harsiati, T. (2020). Students’ critical thinking skills based on gender and knowledge. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 17(4), 544-560. Retrieved from http://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/1246

Moir, A., J., D. (1989). Brain sex: the real difference between men and women. New York: Dell Publishing.

Nazem, I. G., Abu, K. B. Hayati, N. A., & Talib, O. (2013). Gender Analysis of Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument among University Putra Malaysia undergraduate students. Recent Technological Advances in Education. https://www.academia.edu/47504679/Gender_Analysis_of_Critical_Thinking_Disposition_Instrument_among_University_Putra_Malaysia_undergraduate_students?from_sitemaps=true&version=2

Ordem, E. (2017). Developing Critical-Thinking Dispositions in a Listening/Speaking Class. English Language Teaching, 10 (1), 50-55. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v10n1p50

Profetto, MG, J., Hesketh, K. L., Lang, S., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2003). A study of critical thinking and research utilization among nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research 25 (3) 322-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945902250421

Rustaman, N. Y. (2005). The development of inquiry learning research in science education. Paper presented in National Seminar II. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._BIOLOGI/195012311979032-NURYANI_RUSTAMAN/PenPemInkuiri.pdf

Sasser, L. (2010). Brain Difference Between Gender. Gender Differences In Learning, Genesis, 5, 1-2.

Spincer, K. L., & Hanks, W. E. (1995). Multiple measures of critical thinking skills and predisposition in assessment of critical thinking. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX. (Eric Document Reproduction Services No. Ed 391 185).

Sulaiman, T., Kumar, K. S., Fauzi, A.M.A., & Syrene, S.A.R (2017). Relationship between Critical Thinking Disposition and Teaching Efficacy Among Special Education Integration Program Teachers in Malaysia. 2nd International Conference and Workshop on Mathematical Analysis 2016 (ICWOMA2016) AIP Conf. Proc. 1795, 020027-1–020027-8; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497217

Sulistiyawati & Andriani, C. (2017). Critical Thinking Ability and Biology Learning Outcomes Based on Gender Differences in Students. Academic Discourse, 1 (2), 127-142. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/wacanaakademika/article/view/1289

Syahfitri, J. (2019a). Pengembangan Tes Disposisi Berpikir Kritis dalam Biologi di Perguruan Tinggi. Disertasi. Program Doktoral Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Syahfitri, J., Firman, H., Redjeki, S., & Sriyati, S. (2019b). Profile of the disposition of critical thinking students of biology education in higher education. Journal of Bioeduin, 9 (1), 23-29. Retrieved from https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/bioeduin/article/view/4341

Witelson, S.F., Glezer, I.I., & Kigar, D.L. (1995). Women Have Greather Density of Neurons in Posterior Temporal Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 15 (5), 3418-3428. Retrieved fro https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/15/5/3418.full.pdf

Yorganci, S. (2016). Critical Thinking Dispositions of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers. Participatory Educational Reseaarch (PER), 3(3), 36-46. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED583489.pdf

Yucel, A., & Kogak, C. (2010). Determining the Critical Thinking Levels of Student Teachers and Evaluating Through Some Variables. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 865-882.

Yuksel, G., & Alci, B. (2012). Self-efficacy and critical thinking dispositions as predictors of success in school practicum. International Online Journal of Educations of Educational Sciences, 4, 81-90. https://iojes.net/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&makale_id=41232

Zaidi, Z.F. (2010). Gender Differences in Human Brain: A Review. The Open Anatomy Journal, 2, 37-55. https://doi.org/10.2174/1877609401002010037

Zalizan M.Z, Saemah R., Roselan B., Jamil A. (2005). Prestasi Akademik Mengikut Gender, Jurnal Pendidikan 30. P. 93 -111. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti kebangsaan malaysia.

Zeliha, O.G., Ibrahim, G., Yasemin, D., & Fatma, G. K. (2014). The reflection of critical thinking dispositions on operational chemistry and physics problems solving of engineering faculty students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174, 448 – 456. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/533479

Zubaidah, S. (2010). Critical Thinking: higher order thinking skills that can be developed through science learning. In Paper of the National Science Seminar with the Theme of Optimizing Science to Empower Humans. Unesa Postgraduate, 16 (1), 1-14.

Author Biographies

Jayanti Syahfitri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Harry Firman, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Jayanti Syahfitri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).