Comparison of Nature of Science Profile in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore Secondary Science Textbooks: Case of Electricity Lesson

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1878

Published:

2022-11-30

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): November

Keywords:

Nature of Science, Secondary Science Textbooks, Family Resemblance Approach

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Dhitareka, P. H., Hidayat, A., & Siahaan, P. (2022). Comparison of Nature of Science Profile in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore Secondary Science Textbooks: Case of Electricity Lesson. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2299–2306. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1878

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Nature of Science is a significant element in science education, especially for the linkages to scientific literacy. As one of an educational support for both teachers and students, textbooks become crucial for teaching and learning. Textbooks may elicit NOS understanding for students and guide teacher to deliver NOS understanding. The way to make better process and outcome, integration of NOS into the textbooks comprehensively is crucial. To get a better understanding of NOS within the diverse framework, an inclusive framework is needed to get better understanding, thus, Family Resemblance Approach is chosen. This study aims to identify the profile of NOS integration and NOS quality in secondary science textbooks by comparing different textbook from three neighboring countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore). Descriptive research design with content analysis method conducted to identify the documents using the Family Resemblance Approach to NOS as the analytical framework. The results show that Indonesian textbooks presenting most abundance of NOS, but contain most materials delivered and the quality is mainly at low level. Malaysian textbooks contain the least representation but contain well proportion for the quality and materials presented. Singapore textbooks is least materials with abundance of NOS and consist of high-level quality of NOS. This may lead the conformity of the significance of textbooks elicited students understanding of NOS

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of science in science education: Toward a coherent framework for synergistic research and development. Second International Handbook of Science Education, 1041–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_69/

BouJaoude, S., Dagher, Z. R., & Refai, S. (2018). The Portrayal of Nature of Science in Lebanese Ninth Grade Science Textbooks. In Representations of Nature of Science in School Science Textbooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650524-4

Clough, M. P. (2018). Teaching and Learning About the Nature of Science. In Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0

Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2014). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. In Science and Education.

Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education: Why Does it Matter? Science and Education, 25(1–2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8

Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1219535

Erduran, S., Dagher, Z. R., & McDonald, C. V. (2019). Contributions of the Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science in Science Education: A Review of Emergent Research and Development. Science and Education, 28(3–5), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00052-2

Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 999–1021). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_30

Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2016). From FRA to RFN, or How the Family Resemblance Approach Can Be Transformed for Science Curriculum Analysis on Nature of Science. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9861-3

Laherto, A., Kampschulte, L., Vocht, M. de, Blonder, R., Akaygun, S., & Apotheker, J. (2018). Contextualizing the EU’s “Responsible research and innovation†Policy in science education: A conceptual comparison with the nature of science concept and practical examples. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89513

McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (2020). Nature of Science in Science Instruction: Meaning, Advocacy, Rationales, and Recommendations. In Science: Philosophy, History and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_1

McDonald, C. V., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2018). Representations of Nature of Science in School Science Textbooks. Representations of Nature of Science in School Science Textbooks, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650524-1/

NGSS. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. In Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290

OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018: What 15-year-old students in Indonesia know and can do. Oecd, 1–10. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-iii_bd69f805-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org//sites/bd69f805-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/bd69f805-en#fig86

Park, W., Yang, S., & Song, J. (2020). Eliciting students’ understanding of nature of science with text-based tasks: insights from new Korean high school textbooks. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1714094

Salem, M. A. (2021). The Representation of Nature of Science (NOS) in Grade 6 French, American, and Lebanese Science Textbooks Used in Lebanon (Master Thesis). http://scholarworks.aub.edu.lb/bitstream/handle/10938/22998/SalemMarie-Noel_2021.pdf?sequence=1

Satgas Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Kemendikbud. (2019). Desain Induk Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Dasar. https://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Desain-Induk-Gerakan-Literasi-Sekolah-2019.pdf

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: insights and interpretations. In OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf

Author Biography

Putra Habib Dhitareka, UPI

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Putra Habib Dhitareka, Arif Hidayat, Parsaoran Siahaan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).