Fuzzy Sugeno Method for Opinion Classification Regarding Policy of PPKM and Covid-19 Vaccination

Authors

Djihan Wahyuni , Eni Sumarminingsih , Suci Astutik

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1958

Published:

2022-11-30

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): November

Keywords:

Sentiment Analysis, FIS Sugeno, PPKM, Covid-19 Vaccination

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Wahyuni, D., Sumarminingsih, E. ., & Astutik, S. . (2022). Fuzzy Sugeno Method for Opinion Classification Regarding Policy of PPKM and Covid-19 Vaccination. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2210–2215. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1958

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The Indonesian government has implemented various interventions to overcome the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, including those written in Minister of Home Affairs Instructions on PPKM (Community Activities Restrictions Enforcement) and Covid-19 vaccination policies. This policy are not at least reaping the pros and cons, so it is necessary to monitor public opinion to be able to provide solutions or become an evaluation of future policies. The aim of this study is to determine the polarity of public opinion regarding PPKM and Covid-19 vaccinations policies on Twitter, as well as to determine the implementation of FIS Sugeno in classifying textual data. There are several stages carried out, i.e. data collection, data pre-processing, data labeling, data weighting, identification of membership functions, determination of fuzzy sets, formation of a classification system, and evaluation of classification results. In this study, the performance of FIS Sugeno in classifying tweets was quite good with an average accuracy of 89.13%. Meanwhile, public opinion regarding the PPKM and Covid-19 vaccination policies tends to be balanced with 36.92% of tweets classified as a positive sentiments, 22.85% being negative sentiments, and another 40.23% belonging to neutral sentiments.

References

Aryandani, A. I. S. Y. A. H., Solimun, N., Rinaldo Fernandes, A. A., & Efendi, A. C. H. M. A. D. (2022). Implementation of Fuzzy C-Means in Investor Group in the Stock Market Post-Covid-19 Pandemic. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 21, 415-423. DOI: 10.37394/23206.2022.21.49

Birjali, M., Kasri, M., & Beni-Hssane, A. (2021). A comprehensive survey on sentiment analysis: Approaches, challenges and trends. Knowledge-Based Systems, 226, 107134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107134

Efrilianda, D. A., Dianti, E. N., & Khoirunnisa, O. G. (2021). Analysis of twitter sentiment in COVID-19 era using fuzzy logic method. Journal of Soft Computing Exploration, 2(1), 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52465/joscex.v2i1.12

Fu, G., & Wang, X. (2010). Chinese Sentence-Level Sentiment Classification Based on Fuzzy Sets. Coling, 312–319. Retrieved from https://aclanthology.org/C10-2036.pdf

Gorunescu, F. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts, Model, and Techniques. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19721-5_5

Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques third edition. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher.

Hu, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, C., Luo, Z., Luo, X., Xiao, L., & Shi, J. (2021). Uncertainty modeling for multi center autism spectrum disorder classification using takagi-sugeno-kang fuzzy systems. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems. DOI: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3073368

Kaur, A., & Kaur, A. (2012). Comparison of fuzzy logic and neuro-fuzzy algorithms for air conditioning system. International journal of soft computing and engineering, 2(1), 417-20. Retrieved from shorturl.at/OQT38

Kumar, K., & Prakash, A. (2018). Developing a framework for assessing sustainable banking performance of the Indian banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(5), 689-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2018-0162

Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis lectures on human language technologies, 5(1), 1-167. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016

MathWorks. (2014). Fuzzy Logic Toolbox User’s Guide. The MathWorks, Inc.

Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010, May). Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10). Retrieved from https://aclanthology.org/L10-1263/

Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015). A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: tasks, approaches and applications. Knowledge-based systems, 89, 14-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015

Åžahin, M. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18(6), 1591-1616. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7

Serrano-Guerrero, J., Romero, F. P., & Olivas, J. A. (2021). Fuzzy logic applied to opinion mining: a review. Knowledge-Based Systems, 222, 107018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107018

Setiawan, H., Utami, E., & S. (2021). Twitter Sentiment Analysis Post-Covid-19 Online Lecture Using Support Vector Machine and Naive Bayes Algorithm. Journal of Computing and Informatics, 43–51.

Thakkar, H., Shah, V., Yagnik, H., & Shah, M. (2021). Comparative anatomization of data mining and fuzzy logic techniques used in diabetes prognosis. Clinical eHealth, 4, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceh.2020.11.001

Thangaraj, M., & Sivakami, M. (2018). Text Classification Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management (IJIKM), 118–134.

Torkayesh, A. E., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2021). Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102975

Twitter. (2021). Retrieved from https://about.twitter.com/.

Villavicencio, C., Macrohon, J. J., Inbaraj, X. A., Jeng, J. H., & Hsieh, J. G. (2021). Twitter sentiment analysis towards covid-19 vaccines in the Philippines using naïve bayes. Information, 12(5), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12050204

Wang, L. L., & Lo, K. (2021). Text mining approaches for dealing with the rapidly expanding literature on COVID-19. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(2), 781-799. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa296

Wang, S., Celebi, M. E., Zhang, Y. D., Yu, X., Lu, S., Yao, X., ... & Tyukin, I. (2021). Advances in data preprocessing for biomedical data fusion: an overview of the methods, challenges, and prospects. Information Fusion, 76, 376-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.001

Xia, E., Yue, H., & Liu, H. (2021). Tweet sentiment analysis of the 2020 US presidential election. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (pp. 367-371). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442442.3452322

Yang, Y., & Pedersen, J. O. (1997, July). A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Icml (Vol. 97, No. 412-420, p. 35).

Author Biographies

Djihan Wahyuni, Departement of Statistics, Universitas Brawijaya, 65145, Malang, Indonesia

Eni Sumarminingsih, Universitas Brawijaya

Suci Astutik, Universitas Brawijaya

License

Copyright (c) 2022 djihan wahyuni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).