The Use of E-Modules Based on Socio-Scientific Issues in Efforts to Improve Argumentation and Decision-Making Skills of High School Students
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3507Published:
2023-09-25Downloads
Abstract
The use of e-modules based on socio-scientific issues can be used as a way to provide argumentation and decision-making skills. This study aims to determine the use of e-modules based on socio-scientific issues in improving the argumentation and decision-making skills of high school students. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The research design used was the non-equivalent control group design. The sample in this study was class X students consisting of 132 people who were determined by purposive sampling technique. The research was conducted on two classes, namely the experimental class (learning using e-modules based on socio-scientific issues) and the control class (learning using modules not based on socio-scientific issues). The results showed that there was a significant difference in the mean between the experimental class and the control class in argumentation skills. The Mann-Whitney test on the value of argumentation skills shows a number (2-tailed = 0.000) < α (0.05) which means that there is a difference in the effectiveness of using socio-scientific issue-based e-modules with ordinary modules to improve students' argumentation skills. Then the results of the study showed that there was a significant difference in the average between the experimental class and the control class in student decision-making, shows that the Mann-Whitney test score on the value of argumentation skills shows the number (2-tailed = 0.000) < α (0.05) which means that there is a difference in the effectiveness of using socio-scientific issue-based e-modules with regular modules to improve student decision making. As for the criteria for the N-Gain score, the use of e-modules based on socio-scientific issues to improve students' argumentation skills is included in the moderate category (N-gain = 0.42), and the use of e-modules based on socio-scientific issues to improve student decision making is included in the medium category (N-gain = 0.56).
Keywords:
Argumentation skills Decision making E-module based on socio-scientific issuesReferences
Amalia, N. F., Riandi, R., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Kompleksitas Argumentasi Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik pada Jenjang SD, SMP, dan SMA. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11453
Badarudin, B. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Pengambilan Keputusan Dan Penguasaan Konsep Ipa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Advance Organizer Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar UNISSULA, 4(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.4.1.8-20
Branch, R. M. (2009). Intructional Design : The ADDIE Approach. Springer Science & Bussines Media.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset. Pustaka Belajar.
Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. PsicologÃa Educativa, 20(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1843361
Dewi, M. S. A., & Lestari, N. A. P. (2020). E-Modul Interaktif Berbasis Proyek terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i3.28035
Efrialda, P. P., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2022). Pengembangan E-Modul Sistem Pertahanan Tubuh Dengan Instagram Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas Xi Sma. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v13i1p41-51
Elvarita, A., Iriani, T., & Handoyo, S. S. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mekanika Tanah Berbasis E-Modul Pada Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Jurnal PenSil, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v9i1.11987
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. In Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, Fifth Edition (5th ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885278
Johnson, E. B. (2010). Contextual Teaching Learning. Corwin Press, Inc.
Luthfiyani, S. H., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2019). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis STEM terhadap Literasi Teknologi dan Keterampilan Pengambilan Keputusan Siswa SMA. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 2(2), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v2i2.19251
Maloney, J. (2019). Children’s roles and use of evidence in science: an analysis of decision-making in small groups. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243636
Matsun, M., & Saputri, D. F. (2020). Pengembangan E-Modul Fisika Berbantuan Whatsapp Sebagai Alternatif Pemebalajaran Dimasa Pemdemi Covid 19. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i2.3130
Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Talaee, E. (2020). A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills. Entertainment Computing, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100369
Pitpiorntapin, S., & Topcu, M. S. (2019). Teaching based on socioscientific issues in science classrooms: A review study. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 119–136. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KKUIJ/article/view/59481
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 34–42. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jmpf/article/view/31612
Putra, I. M. T. P. (2022). Kajian Literatur Sistematis: Integrasi Model Inkuiri Berbasis Socioscientific Issues pada Pembelajaran IPA I. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 12(3), 919–928. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i3.704
Rohmawati, E., Widodo, W., & Agustini, R. (2018). Membangun Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berkonteks Socio-Scientific Issues Berbantuan Media Weblog. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v3n1.p8-14
Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.454
Sampson, V., & Gebrino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers Can Use To Promote & Support Scientific Argumentation in The Biology Classroom. The American Biology Teacher Publisher: National Association of Biology Teachers, 72(7). https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.7.7
Septikasari, R., & Frasandy, R. N. (2018). Keterampilan 4C Abad 21 dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar. Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.15548/alawlad.v8i2.1597
Setyaningsih, A., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Parmin, P. (2019). Pengaruh pembelajaran process oriented-guided inquiry learning berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik dalam pembelajaran asam basa terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi siswa SMA kelas XI. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.20693
Siska, S., Triani, W., Yunita, Y., Maryuningsih, Y., & Ubaidillah, M. (2020). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Socio Scientific Issues Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah. Edu Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 8(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v8i1.1490
Soenarko, I., Andayani, Y., & Junaidi, E. (2018). Decision-making skill and students’ chemistry learning outcomes in sma/ma negeri mataram based on the application of the learning method. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 13(2), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v13i2.462
Syahputra, E. (2018). Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional SINASTEKMAPAN, 1(March), 1276–1238. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/0zzi6
Tekin, N., Aslan, O., & Yılmaz, S. (2020). Improving Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Argumentation Quality through Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Modules: An Action Research Study. Journal of Science Learning, 4(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i1.23378
Vera, Anwar, Y., & Ermayanti. (2021). The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(1), 54–64. Retrieved from https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/biosfer/article/view/10998
Viyanti, Cari, Sunarno, W., & Kun Prasetyo, Z. (2016). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Argumentasi Mendorong Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v7i1.1152
Wulandari, S., Hairida, H., & Rasmawan, R. (2018). Deskripsi keterampilan pengambilan keputusan dalam materi pencemaran lingkungan pada mahasiswa pendidikan kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 7(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i3.24609
Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science, 38(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9084-3
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ghaida Sekarlita Fadha, Widi Purwianingsih, Rini Solihat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
