Publication Trends from STEAM in Education from Scopus Database: Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

Edi Supriyadi , Turmudi , Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan , Dadang Juandi

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3576

Published:

2023-06-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 6 (2023): June

Keywords:

Bibliometric, Science education, Scopus, STEAM education

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Supriyadi, E. ., Turmudi, Dahlan, J. A. ., & Juandi, D. . (2023). Publication Trends from STEAM in Education from Scopus Database: Bibliometric Analysis . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3576
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The objective of this study is to shed light on the domain of STEAM education research by employing a three-pronged strategy. This article provides a bibliometric analysis of STEAM education literature by focusing on three major research questions (RQs): RQ1. How has research on STEAM education progressed? RQ2. Who is the most influential in STEAM education research? RQ3. Which affiliations and countries are contributing to STEAM in education? This study combines quantitative analysis with descriptive methods. The evolution of STEAM education and the pattern of publishing found in Scopus, which is determined by research connections, research themes, and scientific journals, are of interest to researchers. Throughout this research, the Bibliometrix R-tool and the BiblioShiny software packages were utilized, one at a time, for data analysis, reduction, visualization, and mapping, respectively. In response to RQ1, this study found the Annual Growth Rate to be 24.19%. This finding is based on the trend of publications in STEAM in Education. The results indicate that there has been an increase in the number of journal articles devoted to this subject, which are frequently disseminated. The second question this research aims to answer is which areas of STEAM education research have the most influence. While Piperopoulos P has the top spot for the most globally mentioned documents, Perignat E holds the top spot for the most locally cited papers. In the meantime, Herro D is a writer who has contributed to the study done in the field of STEAM education. As for RQ3, it can be noted that Jeju National University and the Korea National University of Education are the top two campuses in the world regarding STEAM in Education research publications, both of which are located in South Korea.

References

Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). Stem vs. Steam education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331

Allina, B. (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1296392

Amrutha, V. N., & Geetha, S. N. (2020). A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119131

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Colucci-Gray, L., Trowsdale, J., Cooke, C. F., Davies, R., Burnard, P., & Gray, D. S. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning. In How Can School Curricula Be Broadened Towards a More Responsive, Dynamic, and Inclusive Form of Education? British Educational Research Association.

Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016). Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics, 108(2), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x

Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2

Herranen, J., Fooladi, E. C., & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2021). Editorial: Special issue “Promoting STEAM in education.†Lumat, 9(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1559

Herro, D., Quigley, C., Andrews, J., & Delacruz, G. (2017). Co-Measure: developing an assessment for student collaboration in STEAM activities. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z

Jho, H., Hong, O., & Song, J. (2016). An analysis of STEM/STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1843–1862. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1538a

Kang, N. H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y

Kim, P. W. (2016). The wheel model of STEAM education based on traditional Korean scientific contents. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2353–2371. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1263a

Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The Effect of STEAM Education on Elementary School Student’s Creativity Improvement. Int. Conf. on Circuits, Control, Communication, Electricity, Electronics, Energy, System, Signal and Simulation, Held in Conjunction with GST 2012, 339, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35264-5_16

Kuzior, A., & Sira, M. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blockchain Technology Research Using VOSviewer. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138206

Liao, C. (2016). From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary: An Arts-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873

Lindsay, S. M. (2021). Integrating microscopy, art, and humanities to power STEAM learning in biology. Invertebrate Biology, 140(1), 12327. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12327

Marín-Marín, J. A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: a bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x

Mejias, S., Thompson, N., Sedas, R. M., Rosin, M., Soep, E., Peppler, K., Roche, J., Wong, J., Hurley, M., Bell, P., & Bevan, B. (2021). The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway. Science Education, 105(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605

Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Al Husaeni, D. F. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Engineering Research Using Vosviewer Indexed By Google Scholar. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17(2), 883–894. https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.ASSEEE.16037

Oermann, M. H., Nordstrom, C. K., Wilmes, N. A., Denison, D., Webb, S. A., Featherston, D. E., Bednarz, H., & Striz, P. (2008). Information sources for developing the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(4), 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.10.005

Park, H., Byun, S., Sim, J., Han, H.-S., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of STEAM Education in South Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739–1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a

Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 1– 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002

Piperopoulos, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). Burst Bubbles or Build Steam? Entrepreneurship Education, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy, and Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 970–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12116

Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the Joy in the Unknownâ€: Implementation of STEAM Teaching Practices in Middle School Science and Math Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z

Raman, R., Nair, V. K., Prakash, V., Patwardhan, A., & Nedungadi, P. (2022). Green-hydrogen research: What have we achieved, and where are we going? Bibliometrics analysis. Energy Reports, 8, 9242–9260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.058

Santi, K., Sholeh, S. M., Irwandani, Alatas, F., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). STEAM in environment and science education: Analysis and bibliometric mapping of the research literature (2013-2020). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012097

Shatunova, O., Anisimova, T., Sabirova, F., & Kalimullina, O. (2019). STEAM as an innovative educational technology. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 131–144. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216582/

Supriyadi, E. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis: Computer Science Research From Indonesia. TIERS Information Technology Journal, 3(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.38043/tiers.v3i1.3706

Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003

Tsai, M.-J., Wang, C.-Y., & Hsu, P.-F. (2019). Developing the Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Scale for Computer Literacy Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746747

van Raan, A. (1999). Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics, 45(3), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02457601

White, D., & Delaney, S. (2021). Full STEAM ahead, but who has the map for integration? - A PRISMA systematic review on the incorporation of interdisciplinary learning into schools. Lumat, 9(2), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1387

Author Biographies

Edi Supriyadi, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.

Turmudi, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.

Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.

Dadang Juandi, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Edi Supriyadi, Turmudi, Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan, Dadang Juandi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).