Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): November
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Preliminary Analysis of Scientific Literacy in Fluids at SHS 6 Padang

Authors

Muhammad Dhanil , Fatni Mufit

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4320

Published:

2023-11-25

Downloads

Abstract

One of the 21st-century skills that students must master is scientific literacy. A good mastery of scientific literacy helps solve real-world problems. However, the results of PISA 2018 inform that Indonesian students' scientific literacy is relatively low. This study aims to analyze students' physics scientific literacy on fluid materials. Quantitative descriptive methods using fluid material scientific literacy test instruments were used to collect data. The research sample consisted of 36 students at SHS 6 Padang. The use of students' scientific literacy in the context aspect was 35.5% in the low category, the content was 35.7% in the low category, and the competency category was 35.3% in the low category. So, students' mastery of scientific literacy on fluid materials is in a low category.

Keywords:

Fluids Preliminary analysis Scientific literacy

References

Alvina, S., Mellyzar, M., Zahara, S. R., Masrina, M., & Afrianti, S. (2022). The Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1907–1915. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2121

Amala, I. A., Sutarto, S., Putra, P. D. A., & Indrawati, I. (2023). Analysis of Scientific Literacy Ability Junior High School Students in Science Learning on Environmental Pollution. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1001–1005. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.1816

Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve student digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613

Bellová, R., MelicherÄíková, D., & TomÄík, P. (2018). Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656

Cansiz, N., & Cansiz, M. (2019). Evaluating Turkish science curriculum with PISA scientific literacy framework. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.545798

Dewi, C. A., Khery, Y., & Erna, M. (2019). An ethnoscience study in chemistry learning to develop scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19261

Dhanil, M., & Mufit, F. (2021a). Design and Validity of Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict on Static Fluid Using Adobe Animate CC 2019. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07210

Dhanil, M., & Mufit, F. (2021b). Design and Validity of Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict on Static Fluid Using Adobe Animate CC 2019. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07210

Dirman, H. M., & Mufit, F. (2022). Disain dan Validitas E-Instrument Five Tier-Multiple Choice Test Menggunakan iSpring Quiz Maker Sebagai Asesmen Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Abad-21. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3170–3179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2300

Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9587–9592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114

Effendi, D. N., Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of scientific literacy using VOS viewer: Analysis of science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 12096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012096

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245

Fanata, M. R. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Sains, Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Kementrian Pendidikan dan kebudaya.

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Henukh, A., Simbolon, M., Astra, I. M., & Rosdianto, H. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Science Literacy Ability on Heat Concept. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(2), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i2.2077

Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021

Jamaluddin, J., Jufri, A. W., Ramdani, A., & Azizah, A. (2019). Profil literasi sains dan keterampilan berpikir kritis pendidik IPA SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.185

Jufri, A. W., Setiadi, S., & Sripatmi, D. (2016). Scientific Reasoning Ability Of Prospective Student Teacher in The Excellence Program of Mathematics and Science Teacher Education in University of Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09570-x

Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific Literacy and Science Learning Achievement at Junior High School. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630–636. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312

Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia 2018: Akses Makin Meluas, Saatnya Tingkatkan Kualitas. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/12/hasil-pisa-indonesia-2018-akses-makin-meluas-saatnya-tingkatkan-kualitas

Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st century skills. In Springer International Publishing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_32

Kunina-Habenicht, O., & Goldhammer, F. (2020). ICT engagement: A new construct and its assessment in PISA 2015. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00084-z

Maxwell, S., Reynolds, K. J., Lee, E., Subasic, E., & Bromhead, D. (2017). The impact of school climate and school identification on academic achievement: Multilevel modeling with student and teacher data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02069

Mufit, F., Asrizal, A., Puspitasari, R., & Annisa, A. (2022). Cognitive Conflict-Based E-Book with Real Experiment Video Analysis Integration to Enhance Conceptual Understanding of Motion Kinematics. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39333

Mufit, F., & Fauzan, A. (2023). The effect of cognitive Conflict-Based Learning (CCBL) Model on remediation of misconceptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.003

Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., & Dhanil, M. (2023). Augmented Reality dan Virtual Reality Berbasis Konflik Kognitif Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Sbad ke-21 [Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Based on Cognitive Conflict as a 21st Century Learning Medium]. Rajawali Press.

PISA, O. (2019). PISA 2018: Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA, OECD Publishing Paris. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework-b25efab8-en.htm

Purwani, L. D., Sudargo, F., & Surakusumah, W. (2018). Analysis of student’s scientific literacy skills through socioscientific issue’s test on biodiversity topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 12019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012019

Puspitasari, R., Mufit, F., & Asrizal. (2021). Conditions of learning physics and students’ understanding of the concept of motion during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012045

Rosidah, U. A., Marwoto, P., & Subali, B. (2021). Analysis of the Need for Android Based Mobile Learning Development to Improve Student Science Literations. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 601–606. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.805

Sinaga, P., Kaniawati, I., & Setiawan, A. (2017). Improving secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability through the design of better science textbooks. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.47939/es.v2i12.22

Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education: Learning, Teaching and Assessment, 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_16

Tienken, C. H. (2017). Understanding PISA results. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2017.1264806

Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Author Biographies

Muhammad Dhanil, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Fatni Mufit, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Dhanil, M., & Mufit, F. (2023). Preliminary Analysis of Scientific Literacy in Fluids at SHS 6 Padang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9257–9262. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4320