Development of Discovery Learning and Toulmin Argument Pattern (TAP) Based Learning Devices to Trains Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on Global Warming Materials
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.4862Published:
2023-12-25Issue:
Vol. 9 No. SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applications towards a golden Indonesia 2045Keywords:
Critical Thinking Skills, Development of Learning Devices, Discovery Learning, Global Warming, Toulmin Argument Pattern (TAP)Research Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to develop learning tools for the Discovery Learning model based on the Toulmin Argument Pattern (TAP) which are valid, practical and effective for training students' critical thinking skills on global warming. This research is a development research with the ADDIE model (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate) and is tested in SMA Negeri 1 Menganti with One Group Pre test – Posttest Design. Data collection through observation, tests and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques using descriptive quantitative analysis, qualitative and parametric statistical tests. The results of the study show that the learning tools developed are in the valid category, the learning tools developed are practical in terms of the implementation of the lesson plans and the learning activities of active students according to the stages of Discovery Learning syntax, the learning tools developed are effective in terms of from Increased critical thinking skills seen from the n-gain in the high category , there is an increase in students' critical thinking skills, there is no difference increasing critical thinking skills from one class to another.  It was concluded that the discovery learning model based on Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) Global Warming material developed was valid, practical, and effective
References
Afrizon. (2012). Peningkatan Perilaku Berkarakter dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas IX MTs N Model Padang Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Fisika Menggunakan Model Problem Based Instructionâ€. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika. https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v1i1.598
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House,83(2), 39–43.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo- DomÃnguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching- learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(June), 100584. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v4i1.44580
Clifton, Julian & Chris Majors, Culture, Conservation, and Conflict (2012) Perspectives on Marine Protection Among the Bajau of Southeast Asia, Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.618487
Devy, H. C., Puspitawati, R. P., & Yakub, P. (2020). Validitas dan efektivitas lkpd pendekatan toulmin’s argument pattern untuk melatih keterampilan argumentasi. Bioedukasi: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248
Dewi, R. S. & Ashari. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika SMA N 3 Purworejo Kelas XI Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Radiasi. 6 (1): 64- 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Dwi Siswoyo. 2011). Ilmu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press
Ennis, Robert H. (2013) The Nature of Critical Thinking: Outlines of General Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.http://www.criticalthinking.net/longdefinition.html (diunduh 14 Desember 2016)
Erduran, Sibel, Shirley Simon, and Jonathan Osborne. (2004) “TAP ping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Patternfor Studying Science Discourse.†Science Education 88(6): 915–33.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Erduran. S., Jimenez – Aleizandre, M. (2007). Argumentation in science education : Perspectives from classroom – based research. In International Journal of Science Education (Vol.14, Issue 5).
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
Fatmawati, A. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran konsep pencemaran lingkungan menggunakan model pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah untuk SMA kelas X. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika, 4(2),94-103. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v10i1.6720
Handayani (2015) Putri, Murtiati, dan Sardianto. Analisis Argumentasi Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palembang Dengan Menggunakan Model Argumentasi Toulmin. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika. 2(1), https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v2i1.2355
Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, S.-Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology- enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education 2(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
Irvan, A., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa bebasis pola toulmin’s argument pattern (tap) menggunakan model argument driven inquiry dan diskusi pada pembelajaran fisika sma. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 09(03), 318– 324. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v9n3.p318-324
Isbandiyah, S., & Sanusi, A. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) (L. Hhadi (ed.)). Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.
Jou, M., Lin, Y.-T., & Wu, D.-W. (2016). Effect of a blended learning environment on student critical thinking and knowledge transformation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1131–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.961485
Khofiyah HN, Santoso A (2019). Pengaruh model discovery learning berbantuan media
benda nyata terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan. 4(1):61-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i1.11857
Krahenbuhl, KS. (2016) . Student-centered Education and Constructivism:Challenges, Concerns, and Clarity for Teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, Vol. 0,No.0, 1-9 2016. DOI:10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311
Martyn, J., Terwijn, R., Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2014). Exploring the relationships between teaching, approaches to learning and critical thinking in a problem-based learning foundation nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 829–835. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.023
Masek, A., & Yamin, S. (2011). The effect of problem based learning on critical thinking ability: atheoretical and empirical review. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 215- 221.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012151
Nismalasari, S., & Mukhlis R. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Keterampilan Sains dan Hasil Belajar Peserta didik Pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran Harmonis. Edusains. 4 (2):74- 94
DOI: 10.23971/eds.v4i2.511
Permendikbud Nomor 81A Tahun 2013, Implementasi Kurikulum, Lampiran IV. Pedoman Umum Pembelajaran.: Jakarta.
Prafitasari, F., Sukarno, S. and Muzzazinah, M. 2021. Integration of critical thinking skills in science learning using blended learning system. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(3):434–445.
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i3.35788
Probosari,dkk. (2016). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS Pada Mata Kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Bioedukasi. 9 (1): 29-33.https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880
Rahayu, Risnitas, & Effendi, M. H. (2020). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik (lkpd) berpola claim, data, warrant (cdw) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi siswa kelas xi sma. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 3(9), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v3i2.1790
Rini, A. P., Sa’diyah, I. K., & Muhid, A. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery Learning, Apakah Efektif dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa? Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5),2419–2429.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.641
Ruseeffendi, E.T (2017). Dasar – dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non Eksakta Lainnya. Bandung : Tarsito
Santi, I. K. L., & Santoso, R. H. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Menggunakan Penedekatan Saintifik pada Materi Pokok Geometri Ruang SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 35-44.
21831/pg.v11i1.9673
Sondang. R (2012). Identifikasi keterampilan argumentasi melalui analisis “Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP)†pada topik kinematika bagi mahasiswa calon guru. Seminar Bidang Ilmu MIPA Universitas Negeri Medan, 11-12 Mei 2012
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i2.3347
Singh. S & Yaduvanshi. S. (2015) .International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2015 ISSN 22503153.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i2.3347
Siregar, E. Y., Holila, A., & Ahmad, M. (2020). the Validity of Learning Devices With a Contextual Approach To Improve Concept Understanding Abilities. Akademika, 9(2): 145–159.
34005/akademika.v9i02.929
Suherti, E & Siti.(2017). Pembelajaran Terpadu. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang SistemPendidikan Nasional. 2003. Jakarta: Diundangkan oleh Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia.
Utama, K. H., & Kristin, F. (2020). Meta-Analysis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis IPA Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 889–898.
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.482
Von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran S.,Osborne,J., &Simon S.(2008) Arguing to learn and learning to argue case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101 – 131. 10.1002/tea.20213
Yerimadesi, Y., Bayharti, B., Azizah, A., Lufri, L., Andromeda, A., & Guspatni, G. (2019). Effectiveness of acid-base modules based on guided discovery learning for increasing critical thinking skills and learning outcomes of senior high school student. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 12151. https://12151.10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012151
Author Biographies
Arif Rahman Hakim, State University Of Surabaya
Wahono Widodo, State University of Surabaya
Titin Sunarti, State University of Surabaya
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Arif Rahman Hakim, Wahono Widodo, Titin Sunarti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).