Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): November
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Implementation of Computer-Based Summative Assessment

Authors

Yuli Yulianti

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5494

Published:

2023-11-25

Downloads

Abstract

In this current condition, SMK Negeri 1 Tanjungpandan has utilized a paper-based test as the main method of carrying out academic exams and evaluations. Nevertheless, through the rapid development of information and communication technology, various schools and educational institutions have started to switch the evaluation process using computer-based tests as a much more efficient and effective alternative. This also applies to SMKN 1 Tanjungpandan, that expect to implement a computer-based test as the substitute for paper-based tests. This study aims to describe the implementation of computer-based summative assessment at SMK Negeri 1 Tanjungpandan. The subjects in this study were school principals, vice principals for curriculum, the school management team and proctors and technicians in charge of assessment activities. The object of this study is the use of computers based tests in the implementation of summative assessments. This research is a descriptive type using a qualitative approach with the best practice method. The research data were collected by observation and interview methods. Data analysis included data presentation and drawing conclusions. The results of the research conducted shows that the computer-based summative assessment has been running well. This can be seen from the process of preparation, implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and reporting of the assessment results that proceeded smoothly. This is also supported by the readiness of human resources in performing duties as proctors and technicians, as well as adequate infrastructure for the implementation of computer-based summative assessments.

Keywords:

Computer-based assessment Learning evaluation Summative assessment

References

Al-Hawamdeh, B. O. S., Hussen, N., & Abdelrasheed, N. S. G. (2023). Portfolio vs. summative assessment: impacts on EFL learners’ writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF); self-efficacy; learning anxiety; and autonomy. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00225-5

Ambiyar, & Panyahuti. (2020). Asesmen Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer dan Android. Prenada Media

Aojula, H., Barber, J., Cullen, R., & Andrews, J. (2006). Computer-based, online summative assessment in undergraduate pharmacy teaching: The Manchester experience. Pharmacy Education, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210600886209

Bello, H., & Abdullah, N. A. (2021). Investigating the influence of quality factors on user satisfaction with summative computer-based assessment. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.6.2487

Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Bouda, D. (2018). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455

Cerutti, B., Stollar, F., Escher, M., Blondon, K., Aujesky, S., Nendaz, M., & Galetto-Lacour, A. (2019). Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1651-6

Diler, H. G. (2021). Impact on Inclusive Development of Information and Communication Technologies in Turkey. Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance and Risk Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.51410/jcgirm.8.1.3

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., Behrend, M. B., & Smith, E. J. (2019). Optimising Moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0181-4

Gezer, T., Wang, C., Polly, A., Martin, C., Pugalee, D., & Lambert, R. (2021). The relationship between formative assessment and summative assessment in primary grade mathematics classrooms*. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.220

Hancock, T. M. (2010). Use of audience response systems for summative assessment in large classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1092

Hidayat, W., & Mulianah, S. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Berbasis Komputer. KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v9i2.181

Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4

Lewis, D. J. A., & Sewell, R. D. E. (2007). Providing formative feedback from a summative computer-aided assessment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(2). https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710233

Mitra, N. K., & Barua, A. (2015). Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module. BMC Medical Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0318-1

Pratomo, R. Y., & Shofwan, I. (2022). Implementation of Education and Training Program Evaluation. Edukasi, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/edukasi.v16i2.39863

Sani, A. (2018). Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pt. Perkebunan Nusantara Xiv (Persero) Pabrik Gula Camming Kabupaten Bone. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 10–27.

Santi, M., & Prajana, A. (2019). Analisis Implementasi Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer Dengan Ujian Berbasis Kertas Di Smpn 3 Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Cyberspace: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 2(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.22373/cj.v2i2.3997

Subali Bambang. (2012). Prinsip Asesmen Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Sukmawati, E., Imanah, N. D. N., & Rantauni, D. A. (2023). Implementation and challenges of project-based learning of STEAM in the university during the pandemic: A systematic literature review. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v9i1.25177

Vicente, F. S., Escuder, Ã. V., Puig, M. Ã. P., & López, F. S. (2021). Effect on procrastination and learning of mistakes in the design of the formative and summative assessments: A case study. Education Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080428

Volz, A., Higdon, J., & Lidwell, W. (2019). Assessment, Summative. In The Elements of Education for Teachers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315101002-5

Wardani, S. U. K. (2021). Efektivitas Penggunaan Sistem Computer Based Test dan Paper Based Test dalam Pelaksanaan Ujian Tengah Semester Bahasa Indonesia di SMPN 6 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 11(4), 491. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpbs.v11i4.39676

Yulianti, R. (2019). Implementasi Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Computer Based Test (Cbt) di SMA Yadika 6 Tangerang Selatan. Jakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. Retrieved from https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/45689

Author Biography

Yuli Yulianti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Yulianti, Y. (2023). Implementation of Computer-Based Summative Assessment . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10439–10445. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5494