Readiness to Adopt New Technology: The Role of Psychological Capital and Technology Readiness

Authors

Anissa Lestari Kadiyono , Andrea Pardosi

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6552

Published:

2023-12-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applications towards a golden Indonesia 2045

Keywords:

Psychological Capital, Teacher, Technology Readiness, Technology Adoption

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Kadiyono, A. L., & Pardosi, A. (2023). Readiness to Adopt New Technology: The Role of Psychological Capital and Technology Readiness . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 1032–1040. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6552

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The industrial revolution has been the main driver in accelerating the use of technology. The use of technology in automation or data analytics has fundamentally changed the way of working, including at school. The research objective is to highlight the readiness of individuals to adopt new technologies, exploring the important role of psychological capital and technology readiness in this context. The main focus is on the influence of psychological capital, as well as technological readiness, on the likelihood of an individual adopting new technologies. The theories used as the basis of the research are psychological capital and technology readiness. The research was conducted on 403 teacher respondents in Indonesia using a nonprobability sampling method, namely quota sampling. Respondents were obtained by distributing online questionnaires. This research is non-experimental correlational research that is processed quantitatively. The measuring instrument used the Psychological Capital Questionnaire which has been adapted into 4 dimensions and 12 items and the Technology Readiness Index 2.0 which was adapted into 4 dimensions and 8 items. There is a positive correlational relationship between the two variables. An increase in psychological capital increases teachers' technology readiness scores, meaning teachers' positive psychological state can increase their propensity to adopt technology

References

Abdullah, S. M. (2019). Social Cognitive Theory : A Bandura Thought Review published in 1982-2012. PSIKODIMENSIA, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.24167/psidim.v18i1.1708

Alika, O., & Radia, E. H. (2021). Development of Learning Media Based on Cross Puzzle Game in Science Learning to Improve Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.667

Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! Computers and Education, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159

Bakirtas, H. (2017). Technology Readiness to New Technologies: An Empirical Study. Journal of International Social Research, 10(52). https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1948

Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407422

Bandura, A. (2010). Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, September 2013, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802

BPS. (2022). Jumlah Guru SMA 2019-2022. BPS Bandung Kota. https://bandungkota.bps.go.id/indicator/28/577/1/jumlah-guru-sma.html

Bui, T. H. (2022). English teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. In International Journal of Educational Research Open (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100204

Dinc, E. (2019). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of barriers to technology integration in education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634187

Djalante, R., Shaw, R., & DeWit, A. (2020). Building resilience against biological hazards and pandemics: COVID-19 and its implications for the Sendai Framework. Progress in Disaster Science, 6, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100080

Elsafty, A., Abadir, D., & Shaarawy, A. (2020). How Does the Entrepreneurs’ Financial, Human, Social and Psychological Capitals Impact Entrepreneur’S Success? Business and Management Studies, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.11114/bms.v6i3.4980

Ermiana, I., Agustini, K., Sudatha, I. G. W., & Warpala, I. W. S. (2022). Pengaruh Knowledge Management Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Jurusan MIPA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2272–2278. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1799

Ferreira, J. B., da Rocha, A., & da Silva, J. F. (2014). Impacts of technology readiness on emotions and cognition in Brazil. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 865–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.005

Francom, G. M. (2019). Barriers to technology integration : A time-series survey study Barriers to technology integration : A time-series survey study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1679055

Griffin, E., & McClish, G. (2011). Social Learning Theory of Albert Bandura. In A First Look at Communication Theory.

Hardi, H. (2023). Mathematical Connection Communication Learning Model and Information Technology for Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 5992–5999. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4845

Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C. J., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005

Lin, M., & Kim, Y. (2020). The reliability and validity of the 18-item long form and two short forms of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire in three Japanese samples. Addictive Behaviors, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.019

Luthans, B. C., Luthans, K. W., & Jensen, S. M. (2012). The Impact of Business School Students’ Psychological Capital on Academic Performance. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.609844

Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. In Personnel Psychology (Vol. 60, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x

Luthans, F., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Lester, P. B. (2006). Developing the Psychological Capital of Resiliency. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305285335

Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. In Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001

Matthing, J., Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2006). Developing successful technology-based services: The issue of identifying and involving innovative users. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(5), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610679909

Nuryanna, N., Halim, A., Mahzum, E., & Hamid, A. (2021). Acceptance of Technology by Islamic Boarding School Students Based on the TAM Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.825

Obschonka, M., & Stuetzer, M. (2017). Integrating psychological approaches to entrepreneurship: the Entrepreneurial Personality System (EPS). Small Business Economics, 49(1), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9821-y

Okur, M. R., & HamutoÄŸlu, N. B. (2023). Internal technology barriers, learning approaches, and technology adoption. Distance Education, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2226623

Parasuraman. (2000a). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A Multipleitem Scale To Measure Readiness To Embrace New Technologies. Journal Of Service Research, 2:307(May).

Parasuraman, A. (2000b). Technology readiness index (TRI): a multiple-item scale to measure. Journal of Service Research, 2(4).

Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730

Park, H. J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Technology readiness and technology paradox of unmanned convenience store users. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102523

Patton, W., Bartrum, D. A., & Creed, P. A. (2004). Gender Differences for Optimism, Self-esteem, Expectations and Goals in Predicting Career Planning and Exploration in Adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 4(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-005-1745-z

Rahmat, A. D., Kuswanto, H., & Wilujeng, I. (2023). Integrating Technology into Science Learning in Junior High School: Perspective of Teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2391–2396. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2922

Raygan, A., & Moradkhani, S. (2022). Factors influencing technology integration in an EFL context: investigating EFL teachers’ attitudes, TPACK level, and educational climate. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839106

Sugiono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In Alfabeta Bandung.

Summak, M. S., Baǧlibel, M., & Samancioǧlu, M. (2010). Technology readiness of primary school teachers: A case study in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.393

Unesco. (2007). ICT in education in the Asia-Pacific region: progress and plan. Unesco.Org. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154992

Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305562

Author Biography

Anissa Lestari Kadiyono, Fakultas Psikologi - Universitas Padjadjaran

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Anissa Lestari Kadiyono, Andrea Pardosi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).