Measurement of Psychometric Attributes Scientific Literacy Tests for Madrasah Tsanawiyah Students
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.8447Published:
2025-02-12Downloads
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to measuring the validity and reliability of scientific literacy test instruments. Scientific literacy test instruments are reviewed from theoretical validity (construct, relevance and clarity), empirical validity, and reliability. This research was conducted using a quantitative approach. Data was collected using a questionnaire and tested to measure the eligibility of the test for use in exams. The scientific literacy test instrument tested for theoretical validity through expert judgment involving three validators. The scientific literacy test instrument is considered valid if it has a content validity coefficient value ≥ 0.667. After being declared theoretically valid, the scientific literacy test instrument was then tested on 100 students. The results of the scientific literacy test instrument trials are then analyzed to determine empirical validity and reliability. The results showed that 26 scientific literacy test instruments were declared theoretically valid with each aspect (construction, relevance and clarity) having a content validity coefficient value of ≥ 0.667. The test instrument is declared empirically valid where each question item has rcount > 0.195 (α=0.05 and n=100). The test instrument was declared reliable with a reliability coefficient value of 0.805 > 0.707.
Keywords:
Psycometric attribute Reliability Scientific literacy test ValidityReferences
Affriyenni, Y., Mardiana, M., Marsuki, M. F., & Mulyati, Y. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian literasi sains berbasis PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) pada materi IPA Kelas VII dan VIII. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 6. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v6i1.2378
Afkar, R. (2023). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Man 1 Aceh Besar Pada Materi Hukum Newton Tentang Gravitasi. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. (Vol. 2). UIN Arraniry Banda Aceh. Retrieved from https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/32532/%0Ahttps://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/32532/1/Rian Afkar%2C 190204019 %2C FTK%2C PFS%2C 082277470819.pdf
Amri, N., Putu, N., Widiastuti, K., & Rosnawati, V. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Primary Education, 6(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.24014/ejpe.v6i1.20215
Anggraeni, T. E., & Mundilarto, M. (2020). The Development of Local Wisdom-Based Physics Cognitive Ability Assessment Instrument for Senior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.5718
Anggreni, R. A., Antara, P. A., & Ujianti, P. R. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Literasi Sains Pada Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 10(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v10i2.49303
Aziza, D. R., & Wulandari, R. (2020). The Correlation between Students’ Learning Interest and Motivation and the Ability to Solve Problems in Online Learning IPA Subjects. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 4(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v4i2.914
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bashooir, K., & Supahar, S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19590
Brown, J. D. (2001). Point-biserial correlation coefficients biserial correlation coefficients. JLT Testing & Evlution SIG Newsletter, 5(3), 13–17. Retrieved from https://teval.jalt.org/test/PDF/Brown12.pdf
Deta, U. A., Ayun, S. K., Laila, L., Prahani, B. K., & Suprapto, N. (2024). PISA science framework 2018 vs 2025 and its impact in physics education: Literature review. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 8(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.9215
Hidayah, N., Rusilowati, A., & Masturi, M. (2019). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP/MTs di Kabupaten Pati. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 9(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2019.9.1.3601
Indrawati, M. D., & Sunarti, T. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Literasi Sains Fisika Peserta Didik Pada Bahasan Gelombang Bunyi Di Sma Negeri 1 Gedangan Sidoarjo. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 07(01), 14–20. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230673462.pdf
Irsan, I. (2021). Implemensi Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5631–5639. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1682
Kamper, S. J. (2019). Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 49(4), 286–287. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0702
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 Tentang Kurikulum Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
McGeown, S. P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between adolescent’s reading skills, reading motivation and reading habits. Reading and Writing, 28(4), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9537-9
Nabil, N. R. A., Wulandari, I., Yamtinah, S., Ariani, S. R. D., & Ulfa, M. (2022). Analisis Indeks Aiken untuk Mengetahui Validitas Isi Instrumen Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Berbasis Konteks Sains Kimia. Paedagogia, 25(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v25i2.64566
Nugraha, D. M. D. P. (2022). Hubungan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Dengan Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementary, 5(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.31764/elementary.v5i2.8874
Nurcahyoko, K., Anniurwanda, P., & Sudirjo, E. (2024). Investigating the Factors Influencing Literacy Skills among Young Students in Rural Areas of Indonesia. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 18(2), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v18i2.50287
Nurhasanah, N., Jumadi, J., Herliandry, L. D., Zahra, M., & Suban, M. E. (2020). Perkembangan Penelitian Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di Indonesia. EDUSAINS, 12(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.14148
OECD. (2023). Program For International Student (PISA) 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-assessment-and-analytical
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 Dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34–42. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jmpf/article/view/31612
Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia Belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.
Rusilowati, A. (2018). Asesmen Literasi Sains: Analisis Karakteristik Instrumen dan Kemampuan Siswa Menggunakan Teori Tes Modern Rasch Model. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Universitas Riau Ke-3, 2–15. Retrieved from https://snf.fmipa.unri.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/0.-300B-2-15NI.pdf
Setyawarno, D., Widodo, E., Rosana, D., & Setianingsih, W. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Model PISA untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru dalam Mengukur Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Pertama Development of PISA Model Assessment Instruments to Improve Teacher’s Competence in Measuring Sci. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA Dan Pendidikan MIPA, 5(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpmmp.v5i2.44319
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susetyo, B., Siswaningsih, W., & Oktavi, F. R. (2021). Development of Critical Thinking Test Instruments with Problem Solving Context on The Salt Hydrolysis Material. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i2.19862
Syafitri, A., Anggraini, D. P., Parinduri, W. M., Rambe, T. R., & Rambe, N. (2023). Analisis Validitas Isi Pada Instrumen Penilaian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran IPAS di SD. School Education Journal PGSD FIP UNIMED, 13(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.24114/sejpgsd.v13i4.54309
Windyariani, S., Setiono, S., & Sutisnawati, A. (2017). Pengembangan model asesmen literasi sains berbasis konteks bagi siswa sekolah dasar [Development of a context-based scientific literacy assessment model for elementary school students]. In Seminar Nasional Kedua Pendidikan Berkemajuan dan Menggembirakan (The Second Progressive and Fun Education Seminar (Issue 1, pp. 633–640). Retrieved from http://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/9613.pdf/?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Yusrizal, & Rahmati. (2020). Tes Hasil Belajar. Bandar Publishing.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Satria Bungaran, Hafnati Rahmatan, Andi Ulfa Tenri Pada

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).






