Design of Static Electricity Concept Learning Device with Differentiated Strategy In facilitating Inclusive Education
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9269Published:
2024-12-31Downloads
Abstract
Students' learning needs need to be considered when teaching in the classroom. Implementation of differentiated learning is one of the teaching applications that pays attention to students' needs. The study aims to design static electricity learning devices with a differentiated approach in facilitating inclusive education. The study is part of the development of learning devices consisting of three stages, namely: preliminary stage, development stage and implementation stage. The results show a valid value teaching module with an average value of 81.25 including the valid category. In the implementation, a trial of differentiated learning devices was carried out through teaching in class IX. At this stage, information was obtained on the value of the implementation of learning implementation above 90 including the Very High category. Likewise, student learning outcomes at this implementation stage increased with an N-Gain value of 0.578 including the moderate category. The effect size test value was obtained at 6,510 including a strong effect. This shows that the implementation of the differentiated learning device design has a strong effect on static electricity learning outcomes. The conclusions of the study were obtained as follows: (1) the design of differentiated learning devices assessed by experts and practices is valid; (2) the implementation of the differentiated learning device design is included in the high category, there are two students who have obstacles in the form of slow learners at the regular school which is the trial location; (3) the design of the differentiated learning device which is arranged effectively is shown by the N-Gain value in the medium category and the effect size value in the strong effect category
Keywords:
Differentiated Strategy Inclusive Education Static ElectricityReferences
Aggraini, R. (2015). Static electricity material e-module based on a scientific approach using kvisoft flipbook maker software. Tekno-Pedagogi. Jur. Tek. Pend, 5(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.22437/teknopedagogi.v5i2.7515
Ajredini, F., Izairi, N., & Zajkov, O. (2014). Real experiments versus phet simulations for better high-school students’ understanding of electrostatic charging. European Journal of Physics Education, 5(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.20308/ejpe.38416
Asri, D., Cahyono, B., & Trisnani, R. (2021). Early reading learning for special needs students: challenges on inclusive primary school during covid-19 pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1062-1074. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5ns1.1489
Asrowi, R. (2023). Development of the wimshurst machine as a learning media on static electricity material for junior high schools. Curr. STEAM Educ. Res., 1(2), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.58797/cser.010201
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction. Longman.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Collázos, C., Otero, H., Isaza, J., & Mora, C. (2016). Diseño y construcción de una máquina de wimshurst para la enseñanza de la electrostática. Formación Universitaria, 9(5), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062016000500011
Dilber, R. (2010). Effect of conceptual change instruction on students' understanding of electricity concepts. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 7(4), 478. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2010.032935
Eikeland, I., & Ohna, S. E. (2022). Differentiation in education: a configurative review. In Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy (Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 157–170). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351
Elder, B. C., Damiani, M. L., & Oswago, B. O. (2016). From attitudes to practice: Utilizing inclusive teaching strategies in Kenyan primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(4), 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1082648
Feyzioğlu, E., Akpınar, E., & Tatar, N. (2018). Effects of technology-enhanced metacognitive learning platform on students’ monitoring accuracy and understanding of electricity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.43
Florian, L. and Black‐Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores* †. http://lists.asu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903&L=aera-d&P=R6855
Ismalia, I., Kusumawati., M., & Wahyuni, P. (2022). Investigating the use of phet simulation as a substitute for practical tools in understanding the concept of static electricity. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(1), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i1.7
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 48 Tahun 2023 tentang Akomodasi yang Layak untuk Peserta Didik Penyandang Disabilitas pada Satuan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Formal, Pendidikan Dasar, Pendidikan Menengah, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.
Lagarusu, A., Haris Odja, A., & Payu, C. S. (2023). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Melalui Pendekatan Berdiferensiasi Menggunakan Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Konsep Fisika Di SMA Negeri 6 Gorontalo Utara. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpf.v13i2
Laumarang, S. N., Odja, A. H., & Supartin, S. (2023). Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Konsep Pemanasan Global. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 3(3), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v3i3.2337
Maeng, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (2015). Differentiating Science Instruction: Secondary science teachers’ practices. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2065–2090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1064553
Molbaek, M. (2018). Inclusive teaching strategies–dimensions and agendas. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(10), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1414578
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 125–135). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
Nilyani, K. (2023). Needs analysis to develop physics learning e-modules on static electricity material. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 7(2), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol7-iss2/781
Octavia, S., Rahma, A., & Destine, K. (2021). Misconception analysis of static electricity materials in class ix junior high school. Iser (Indonesian Science Education Research), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/iser.v3i2.31239
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian hasil belajar pada tingkat satuan pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa.
Shen, J. and Linn, M. (2010). A technology‐enhanced unit of modeling static electricity: integrating scientific explanations and everyday observations. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1597-1623. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.514012
Shohib, M., Rahayu, Y., Wasis, W., & Hariyono, E. (2021). Scientific literacy ability of junior high school students on static electricity and electricity in living things. Ijorer International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(6), 700-708. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i6.170
Suantari, N., Suma, K., & Pujani, N. (2018). Development of three tier static electricity diagnostic test to identify student conceptions about static electricity. International Research Journal of Engineering It & Scientific Research. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v4n5.285
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (12th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sulistioning, R., Nugraha, U., Subagyo, A., Putri, Y., Sari, N., & Wiza, O. (2020). Investigation of learning science: fun in learning, interest in learning time, social implications, scientific normality for science learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1126-1134. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080402
Supardi, S. and Hasanah, E. (2020). Junior high school students experiences of high technology based learning in indonesia. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.9
Timbola, G., Mursalin, & Odja, A. H. (2023). Developing Differentiated Learning Devices to Heighten Student Learning Outcome on Light Concepts at SMP Negeri 1 Kwandang. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 5(6), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.6.7
Tomlinson, A. C., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and Student Success in a Differentiated Classroom. ASCD. www.ascd.org/memberbooks
Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Point/counterpoint: Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Roeper Review, 26(4), 188–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554268
Tomlinson, C. A. . (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Zagona, A., Kurth, J., & MacFarland, S. (2017). Teachers’ views of their preparation for inclusive education and collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education the Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 40(3), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417692969
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Julanita Saleh, Abdul Haris Odja, Masri Kudrat Umar, Mursalin, Muhammad Yusuf, Trisnawaty Junus Buhungo, Muznawaty Pilobu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
