Multi-criteria Group Decision Making Model to Selecting the Most Appropriate Performance of Contract Employees Using the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment and Borda Methods
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9566Published:
2025-01-01Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 12 (2024): DecemberKeywords:
Borda, Criteria weighting, Group decision support system, Weighted aggregated sum product assesmentResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research aims to evaluate the performance of contract employees using the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment and Borda methods. The Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment approach uses mathematical calculations, thereby producing precise and accurate results. The Borda technique is useful because it efficiently aggregates diverse rankings of alternatives through voting groups that combine many preferences. The choice of these two methodologies has the ability to produce more efficient solutions to complex problems by guiding or making decisions more quickly in resolving problems. The determining criteria for assessing the performance of contract employees are punctuality or attendance, skills, knowledge, communication, decision making, discipline, adaptation to the work environment, work safety and initiative. The results of the calculation process from the ranking combination of the weighted aggregate sum product assessment and the borda method were obtained by placing alternative 5 as an employee who is worthy of being a permanent employee and getting the highest score of 0.288. All calculations using this method can be a guide in making decisions at PT SMART Tbk Surabaya, because the accuracy of contract employee performance evaluations has a significant influence on achieving company goals in the permanent employee recruitment process.
References
Any, A. K., & Imas, P. M. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Karyawan Tetap dan Karyawan Kontrak pada BPR Bank Daerah Gunungkidul. Cakrawangsa Bisnis, 1(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.35917/cb.v1i1.116
Ashaf, D. H., Hidayat, S. W., & Ahmadi, A. (2019). Decision Support System Determines The Purchase Of House Right Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) And Borda Methods. Journal Asro, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.37875/asro.v10i1.85
Aziz, T. F. A., Sulistiyono, S., Harsiti, H., Setyawan, A., Suhendar, A., & Munandar, T. A. (2020). Group decision support system for employee performance evaluation using combined simple additive weighting and Borda. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(3), 032014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/3/032014
Baykasoğlu, A., & Ercan, E. (2021). Analysis of rank reversal problems in “Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment” method. Soft Computing, 25(24), 15243–15254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06405-w
Capuano, N., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Loia, V. (2018). Fuzzy Group Decision Making With Incomplete Information Guided by Social Influence. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(3), 1704–1718. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2744605
Daulay, N. K., Intan, B., & Irvai, M. (2021). Comparison of the WASPAS and MOORA Methods in Providing Single Tuition Scholarships. The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science), 5(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.30865/ijics.v5i1.2969
Elfaladonna, F., Putra, A. M., & Rahmawati, R. (2022). Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Pengangkatan Karyawan Tetap. Jaringan Sistem Informasi Robotik-JSR, 6(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.58486/jsr.v6i1.142.
Grofman, B., Feld, S. L., & Fraenkel, J. (2017). Finding the Threshold of Exclusion for all single seat and multi-seat scoring rules: Illustrated by results for the Borda and Dowdall rules. Mathematical Social Sciences, 85(85), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.11.004
Gupta, S., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2019). Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.038
Johansen, M. S., & Sowa, J. E. (2019). Human resource management, employee engagement, and nonprofit hospital performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(4), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21352
Kilgour, D. M., Grégoire, J.-C., & Foley, A. M. (2022). Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best? Social Choice and Welfare, 58(2), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01347-6
Kumar, R., Bhattacherjee, A., Singh, A. D., Singh, S., & Pruncu, C. I. (2020). Selection of portable hard disk drive based upon weighted aggregated sum product assessment method: A case of Indian market. Measurement and Control, 53(7–8), 1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294020925841
Liao, H., Wu, X., Mi, X., & Herrera, F. (2020). An integrated method for cognitive complex multiple experts multiple criteria decision making based on ELECTRE III with weighted Borda rule. Omega, 93, 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.03.010
López, J. C. L., Álvarez Carrillo, P. A., Gastélum Chavira, D. A., & Solano Noriega, J. J. (2017). A web-based group decision support system for multicriteria ranking problems. Operational Research, 17(2), 499–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0234-0
Morente-Molinera, J. A., Kou, G., Pérez, I. J., Samuylov, K., Selamat, A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). A group decision making support system for the Web: How to work in environments with a high number of participants and alternatives. Applied Soft Computing, 68, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.047
Murti, P. H. K., Wirjodirdjo, B., Bastari, A., & Ahmadi, A. (2021). Using Of Profile Matching And Borda Method In Predicting Threats Country In Asean. Journal Asro, 12(01), 173. https://doi.org/10.37875/asro.v12i01.395
Orouskhani, M., & Shi, D. (2018). Fuzzy adaptive cat swarm algorithm and Borda method for solving dynamic multi‐objective problems. Expert Systems, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12286
Senapati, T., Yager, R. R., & Chen, G. (2021). Cubic intuitionistic WASPAS technique and its application in multi-criteria decision-making. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(9), 8823–8833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02667-8
Setiyowati, S., Sumiati, Sutarti, Wibowo, A. H., Rosalina, V., & Ai Munandar, T. (2019). Group Decision Support System to Determine Regional Development Priority Using the Item-Based Clustering Hybrid Method. Journal of Computer Science, 15(4), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2019.511.518
Syaripudin, A., Efendi, Y., & Harriansyah. (2022). Penerapan Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Menggunakan Metode WASPAS Pada Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Terbaik. KLIK : Kajian Ilmiah Informatika Dan Komputer, 3(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i2.557.
Tian, Z., & Chen, L. (2018). A Multi-centrality Model based on Borda Count Method for Identification of Important Ports in Maritime Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Management, Education and Social Science (ICMESS 2018), 176. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmess-18.2018.298
Vaid, S. K., Vaid, G., Kaur, S., Kumar, R., & Sidhu, M. S. (2022). Application of multi-criteria decision-making theory with VIKOR-WASPAS-Entropy methods: A case study of silent Genset. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 2416–2423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.259
Wang, W., & Reani, M. (2017). The rise of mobile computing for Group Decision Support Systems: A comparative evaluation of mobile and desktop. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 104, 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.008
Zhao, J., Karimzadeh, M., Snyder, L. S., Surakitbanharn, C., Qian, Z. C., & Ebert, D. S. (2019). MetricsVis: A Visual Analytics System for Evaluating Employee Performance in Public Safety Agencies. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934603
Zhao, X., Chen, Y., Ku, M., Rich, E., Deegan, M., & Luna-Reyes, L. (2017). Group Decision Support Systems for Emergency Management and Resilience: CoastalProtectSIM. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 17, 2489–2497. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.301
Author Biographies
Yuanita Candra Puspita, Diponegoro Univesity
Bayu Surarso, Diponegoro Univesity
Jatmiko Endro Suseno, Diponegoro Univesity
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yuanita Candra Puspita, Bayu Surarso, Jatmiko Endro Suseno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).