Profile of Problem Solving and Student Learning Motivation in Science Learning Material on Motion and Force at SMPN 5 Randublatung Satu Atap
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9807Published:
2025-01-25Downloads
Abstract
This research aims to determine students' problem-solving abilities and learning motivation on Motion and Force material. The method in this research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with the subjects used being 18 grade 7 students of SMPN 5 Randublatung Satu Atap, totaling 18 people. To measure students' learning motivation and ability to solve problems. The research results show that the level of student motivation in learning movement and style still varies (high, medium and low). As many as 53% of students have a high level of motivation (scores 54-65); as many as 37% of students have a moderate level of motivation (scores 35-53); and as many as 10% of students have a low level of motivation (score 24-34). The ability to solve problems obtained results in the form of the lowest score of 15, the highest of 45, and the average in one class was 38. The research results showed that students did not understand the material of motion and force. This can be seen from the results of the questionnaire data and questions.
Keywords:
Cognitive abilities, Learning methods, Motivation and problem solvingReferences
Abdillah, K., Jannah, M., Aiman, U., Hasada, S., Fadilla, Z., Taqwin, & Masita. (2022). Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Aceh: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
Agung, A. G. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media Publishing.
Amalissholeha, N., Rokhmat, J., & Gunada, I. W. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pembelajar Ffisika di SMAN 1 Kediri. Empiricism Journal, 4(2), 2745-7613. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.1387
Andriani, N. L. Y., & Darsikin, D. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT), 4(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.22487/j25805924.v4.i3.6221
Arestu, O. O., Karyadi, B., & Ansori, I. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Melalui Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 2(2), 58–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.2.2.58-66
Asmara, A., & Septiana, A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Berkonteks Masalah. Sumatera Barat: CV. Azka Pusaka.
Bayuningsih, A. S., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2017). Analysis of Junior High School Students' Problem-solving Ability Reviewed From Self-regulaterd Learning. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 51-56. http//doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16678
Busyairi, A., & Zuhdi, M. (2020). Profil Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika Ditinjau dari Berbagai Representasi pada Materi Gerak Lurus dan Gerak Parabola. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 6(1), 90-98. http//doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1683
Cahyani, H., & Setyawati, R. (2017). Pentingnya Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah melalui PBL untuk Mempersiapkan Generasi Unggul Menghadapi MEA. PRISMA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 151–160. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21635
Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and Application of a Tree-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students' Understanding of Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939-961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130
Cheriani, Mahmud, A., Tahmir, S., Manda, D., & Dirawan, G. D. (2015). Problem-Based Learning-Buginese Cultural Knowledge Model-Case Study: Teaching Mathematics at Junior High School. International Education Studies, 8(4), 105. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n4p104
Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development and Application of Three-tier Heat and Temperature Test: Sample of Bachelor and Graduate Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 40(40), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/282910056
Fitrianingrum, A. M., Sarwi, & Astuti, B. (2017). Penerapan Instrumen Three-tier Test untuk Mengidentifikasi Siswa SMA pada materi Keseimbangan Benda Tegar. Phenomenon, 7(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2017.7.2.1118
Harahap, N. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Sumatera Utara: Wal Ashri Publishing.
Kasanah, N., & Setiyawati, E. (2024). Miskonsepsi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal IPA Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index di SD Negeri. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.47134/pgsd.v1i4.712
Koyan, I. W. (2012). Stastistik Pendidikan Teknik Analisis Data Kuantitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.47134/pgsd.v1i4.712
Lestari, O. D., & Suyono. (2018). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis Problem Based Learning pada Materi Implus dan Momentum. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 88-98. http//doi.org/10.21831/jpf.v7i1.10476
Lestari, Y. W., Hairid, Sartika, R. P., Enawati, E., & Muharini. (2022). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta didik (LKPD) Berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Materi Koloid. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 3542-5351. http//doi.org/10.31004/eduktif.v4i4.3227
Mardiyah, U., Wanabuliandari, S., & Bintoro, H. S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa dengan Menerapkan Model PJBL Bantuan E-Modul Lubuk Etnomarematika. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 6(3), 2598-9944. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i3.3342
Marlina, R., Nurjahidah, S., Sugandi, A. I., & Setiawan, W. (2018). Penerapan Pendekatan Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas VII MTs pada Materi Perbandingan dan Skala. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovativ, 1(2), https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i2.p113-122
Nasution, S. (1989). Kurikulum dan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nieminen, P., Savinainem, A., & Viiri, J. (2010). Force Concept Inventory-based Multiple-choice Test for Investigating Students' Representational Consistency. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 6, 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020109
Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Changes in Students' Problem-solving Strategies in a Course that Includes context-rich, Multifaceted Problem. Physical Review Special Topich Physics Education Research, 5, 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020102
Pujianto, A., & Darmadi, I. W. (2013). Analisis Konsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Kinematika Gerak Lurus. Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT), 1(1), 16–21. Retrieved from http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/EPFT/article/view/2370/1546
Priadana, M. S., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Tangerang Selatan: Pascal Books.
Rubini, B., & Sunaryo, W. (2016). Pemecahan Masalah dan Pengambilan Keputuasan yang Efektif (Effective Problem Solving and Decision Making). Bogor: Paspa Press.
Rusmono. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran dengan Problem Based Learning itu Perlu. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Serin, H. (2019). Projeck Based Learning in Mathematics Context. International Jurnal of Social Sciens & Educational Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i3p231
Sholehat, F. N., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test pada Sub Materi Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03208.
Sihotang. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Uki Press.
Siregar, A. D., & Harahap, L. K. (2020). Pengembangan E-Modul Berbasis Projek Based Learning Terintegrasi Media Komputasi Hyperchem pada Materi Bentuk Molekul. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v10n1.p1925-1931
Sugiono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sutopo, Jayanti, Bagus, I., & Wartono. (2017). Efektivitas Program Resitasi Berbasis Komputer untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Mahasiswa Tentang Gaya dan gerak. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v4i1.4260
Syahrul, D. A., & Setyarsih, W. (2015). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyabab Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Three-tier Diagnostic Test pada Materi Dinamika Rotarsi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 4(3). http//doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v4n3.p%25p
Syamsidah, & Suryani, S. (2018). Buku Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Mata Kuliah Pengetahuan Bahan Makanan. Yogyakarta: Grup Penerbit CV Budi Utama.
Syarif, D. F. T., Fathurrahman, M., & Karyani. (2019). Tehnik Creative Problem Solving. Yogyakarta: K-Media
Trianto. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
Wena, M. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Bumi Aksara.
Wiyono, F. M., Sugiyanto, S., & Yulianti, E. (2016). Identifikasi Hasil Analisis Miskonsepsi Gerak Membangun Instrumen Diagnostik Three Tier pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 6(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v6n2.p61-69
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karyawan, Siti Patonah, Mega Novita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
