Effectiveness of Innovative Learning Models to Improve Scientific Reasoning on Physics Topics: A Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10197Published:
2025-03-25Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): MarchKeywords:
Innovative learning models, Physics, Scientific reasoningReview
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Students' scientific reasoning ability in physics learning remains a significant challenge. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of innovative learning models in improving students' scientific reasoning based on indicators such as control, correlation, probability, deductive hypothesis, and conservation. The method used is systematic literature review with PRISMA framework. The results showed that innovative learning models, such as Problem-Based Learning, Project-Based Learning, and Inquiry-Based Learning, have a positive impact on students' scientific reasoning. However, each model has weaknesses in improving certain indicators, especially probability and deductive hypothesis. Therefore, this study recommends the development of a learning model that integrates an authentic problem-based approach with STEAM and cognitive conflict strategies to improve students' scientific reasoning. This research provides insights for educators and researchers in designing more effective and relevant learning strategies.
References
Abate, T., Michael, K., & Angell, C. (2020). Assessment of Scientific Reasoning: Development and Validation of Scientific Reasoning Assessment Tool. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1927. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9353
Assem, H. D., Nartey, L., Appiah, E., & Aidoo, J. K. (2023). A Review of Students’ Academic Performance in Physics: Attitude, Instructional Methods, Misconceptions and Teachers Qualification. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.551
Atqiya, N., Yuliati, L., & Diantoro, M. (2021). Argument-driven inquiry for STEM education in physics: Changes in students’ scientific reasoning patterns. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043636
Ayuni, M. S., Distrik, I. W., & Viyanti, V. (2022). The Effect of E-LKPD Assisted PJBL-STEM Learning Model on Scientific Reasoning Ability and Argumentation Performance of Class XII Science Students in Renewable Energy Materials. Physics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2022.4.2.12634
Aziz, A. A., & Johari, M. (2023). The Effect of Argumentation about Socio-Scientific Issues on Secondary Students’ Reasoning Pattern and Quality. Research in Science Education, 53(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10099-5
Bakri, F. P., Budi, E., & Rahmawati, Y. (2023). The integration of mobile learning in STEM-PjBL for Physics learning: a systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2596(1), 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012065
Haryadi, R., & Yusifa, A. (2021). Metode Hypnoteaching Terhadap Pembelajaran Fisika. Alpen: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.24929/alpen.v5i1.70
Herayanti, L., Habibi, H., & Sukroyanti, B. A. (2022). Development of Inquiry-Based Teaching Materials to Improve Physics Teacher’s Conseptual Understanding. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3110–3116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2543
Huda, C., Ma’ani, A. L., & Kaltsum, U. (2022). Analysis of Student Misconceptions Using Digital Four-Tier Diagnostics Test on Newton’s Law. Physics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2022.4.1.8631
Kamaluddin, K., Sani, N. K., Darmadi, I. W., & Nurgan, N. (2023). Analysis of Students Scientific Reasoning Ability and the Correlation to Students Cognitive Ability in Physics Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10173–10179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5657
Koes-H, S., & Putri, N. D. (2021). The Effect of Project-Based Learning in STEM on Students’ Scientific Reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012006
Lorensia, S. L., Handayani, R. D., & Lesmono, A. D. (2024). Analisis Scientific Reasoning Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fluida Dinamis dengan Model STEM-PjBL. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 9(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v9i1.22167
Mochsif, N. D. A., Parno, P., & Yuliati, L. (2021). Pengaruh Model Argument-Driven Inquiry-STEM-EFA terhadap Peningkatan Scientific Reasoning Skills Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 6(12), 1861. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i12.15160
Muchoyimah, S., Kusairi, S., & Mufti, N. (2019). Korelasi Penalaran Ilmiah pada Topik Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.17977/um058v4i2p104-109
Ningrum, T. W., Handayani, R. D., & Maryani, M. (2024). Investigasi Kemampuan Bernalar Ilmiah Siswa Melalui Implementasi Model Problem Based Learning Materi Fisika Fluida Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v12i1.9433
Pascaeka, L., Bektiarso, S., & Harijanto, A. (2023). Scientific Reasoning Skills and Scientific Attitudes of Students in Learning Physics Using Guided Inquiry Model with Vee Map. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9610–9618. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4467
Price, C. B., & Price-Mohr, R. (2019). PhysLab: a 3D virtual physics laboratory of simulated experiments for advanced physics learning. Physics Education, 54(3), 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab0005
Ridwan, M. hasbullah. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.30739/tarbiyatuna.v2i2.1363
Syarqiy, D., Yuliati, L., & Taufiq, A. (2023). Exploration of Argumentation and Scientific Reasoning Ability in Phenomenon-Based Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning in Newton’s Law Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7264–7272. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4589
Thohir, M. A., Dina, H. R., April, Y. F., & Habibi. (2024). Experiential learning model for physics virtual reality design: A case study of pre-service elementary school teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2900(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2900/1/012012
Viyanti, Widyastuti, Suyatna, A., Nurulsari, N., & Dinantikan, H. K. (2023). Scientific Reasoning Analysis on the Implementation of PjBL-Worksheet on Renewable Energy Topic in High School Physics Learning. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Progressive Education 2022 (ICOPE 2022), 1, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-060-2_46
Author Biographies
Rafa Anugrah Putri, Universitas Negeri Malang
Parno, Universitas Negeri Malang
Ahmad Taufiq, Universitas Negeri Malang
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafa Anugrah Putri, Parno, Ahmad Taufiq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
