Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Pancasila Education Learning in Senior High Schools

Authors

Meidawati , Eny Kusdarini

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10202

Published:

2025-02-25

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): February

Keywords:

Educational assessment, Independent curriculum, Learning implementation, Pancasila education

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Meidawati, & Kusdarini, E. (2025). Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Pancasila Education Learning in Senior High Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10202

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the Independent Curriculum in the planning, execution, and assessment of Pancasila Education learning in Senior High Schools throughout Bulungan Regency, identifying key challenges and solutions. The research employs a mixed-methods approach (Concurrent Embedded Design), where qualitative data serves as the primary method, and quantitative data is embedded to support findings. Data were collected from principals and Pancasila Education teachers using interviews and questionnaires, analyzed through both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Results indicate that the implementation of the Independent Curriculum falls into the "fairly good" category, with an overall achievement of 60%. The highest performance was observed in learning planning, whereas assessment had the lowest scores. Key obstacles include difficulties in designing reflective learning, ensuring independent learning tasks align with student workload, and integrating diverse assessment methods. Limited engagement with external experts and lack of consistent feedback also pose challenges. To address these issues, teachers leverage resources such as the Merdeka Mengajar Platform and participate in professional training programs. These findings highlight the need for enhanced teacher training and structured assessment strategies to optimize the effectiveness of Pancasila Education learning under the Independent Curriculum.

References

Anggini, P., Husna, H., Rambe, N. F. S., Nasution, A. K., Lubis, I. H., & Harahap, S. (2024). Independent Curriculum In Improving The Quality Of Education. Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v5i2.1872

Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., Eprijum, D., Pratiwi, I., Utama, B., Alhapip, L., & Widiaswati, D. (2022). Kajian akademik kurikulum untuk pemulihan pembelajaran. Retrieved from https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/24972/

Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337

Barlian, U. C., & Solekah, S. (2022). Implementation of the independent curriculum in improving the quality of education. JOEL: Journal of Educational and Language Research, 1(12), 2105–2118. https://doi.org/10.53625/joel .v1i12.3015

Black, P., & William, B. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How does changing “one-size-fits-all” to differentiate instructions affect teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130

Brown, G. T. (2019). Is assessment for learning really assessment? Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00064

Cahyono, H., Setyawati, E., & Pahrudin, A. (2024). Independent Curriculum Development in Primary and Secondary Education (Schools and Madrasas). FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Manajemen Islam. https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v13i01.7570

Eshariyani, E., Ernawatie, E., Berliani, T., Sumarnie, S., Nugroho, P. J., Limin, D. L., Aprianto, A., Purnomo, W., Winaryo, S., Radiafilsan, C., & Sedek, M. (2023). Pendampingan Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada Komunitas Belajar Kelompok Kerja Guru Di Kota Palangka Raya. PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. https://doi.org/10.33084/pengabdianmu.v8i6.5560

Frayer, D. A., Fredrick, W. C., & Klausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of concept mastery (Vol. 13). Wisconsin Univ. Research & Development Center for Cognitive Learning.

Glaesser, J. (2018). Competence in educational theory and practice: a critical discussion. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0135-

Griffin, P., Cagasan, L., Care, E., Vista, A., & Nava, F. (2016). Formative assessment policy and its enforcement in the Philippines. In laveault & allal (Eds.), In Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 75–92). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_5

Hasibuan, A., Amalia, A., Resky, M., Adelin, N., Muafa, N. F., & Zulfikri, M. A. (2024). Prinsip Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka (Tinjauan Holistik Paradigma Ki Hajar Dewantara Sebagai Pendekatan). NUSRA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v5i2.2287

Hidayat, M. C., & Syam, A. R. (2020). The urgency of strategic planning and management of madrasah human resources in the 4.0 industrial revolution era. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal of Basic Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24269/ajbe.v4i1.2100

Muhonen, H., Verma, P., Suchodoletz, A., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2020). Exploring types of educational classroom talk in early childhood education centers. In Research Papers in Education (pp. 1–22). https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1784259

Mzenzi, S. M., & Simeiane, B. B. (2019). Scientific reasoning development within informal formative assessment use in senior secondary physical science lessons. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH, 7(6), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.2019.795

Nelson, L. (2021). Design and Deliver: Planning and Teaching Using Universal Design for Learning (second). Brookes Publishing.

Nieminen, P., Hähkiöniemi, M., & Viiri, J. (2020). Forms and functions on-the-fly formative assessment conversations in physics inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 362–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1713417

Nirmala, B. I., An-Nurdin, M. I., Muttaqin, M. Y. K., Fajriati, N. A., & Surur, A. M. (2022). Learning Media Palang Ajib (Papan Langka Ajaib) To Easy in Understanding the Meterials of Relationship and Functions. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v6i1.5531

Nisa, S. K., Yoenanto, N. H., & Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2023). Hambatan dan Solusi dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. Didaktika: Journal of Education, 12(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.231

O’Keeffe, L., Rosa, A., Vannini, I., & White, B. (2020). Promoting informal formative assessment practices in higher education: The potential of video analysis as a training tool. Open Journal Per La Formazione in Rete, 20(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.13128/form-8241

Pang, M. (2016). Companion guides for lesson planning: a planning template and the lesson plan pro forma. ELT Journal, 70(ue 4), 444–454,. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw053

Prasetiyo, F. B. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Dan Kesehatan (Pjok) di SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Sleman [Thesis: Magister Pendidikan Program Studi Pendidikan Jasmani]. Retrieved from https://eprints.uny.ac.id/78764/1/fulltext_farhan budi prasetiyo_20733251033.pdf

Surur, M. (2021). Learning planning in schools theory and implementation. Pradina Pustaka Publisher.

Teh, G. B., & Choy, S. C. (2017). Empowering 21st Century Learners Through Holistic and Enterprising Learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., & Hertberg, et al. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profiles in academically diverse classrooms: a review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/

Author Biographies

Meidawati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Eny Kusdarini, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Meidawati, Eny Kusdarini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).