Interactive Web-Based Modern Physics Learning Media with PjBL Model to Improve Scientific Attitudes: A Systematic Review

Authors

Aris Doyan , Susilawati , Ahmad Harjono , Syarful Annam , Muhammad Ikhsan , Nuraini Rachma Ardianti , Syamsul Hakim

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10440

Published:

2025-03-25

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): March

Keywords:

Interactive web, Modern Physics, Project based learning, Scientific attitude

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Doyan, A., Susilawati, Harjono, A., Annam, S., Ikhsan, M., Ardianti, N. R., & Hakim, S. (2025). Interactive Web-Based Modern Physics Learning Media with PjBL Model to Improve Scientific Attitudes: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10440
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Scientific attitude requires mastery of processes that include science process skills, namely the ability to carry out an action concept, theory, and principle, law in the form of facts or evidence. Scientific attitude can be facilitated through learning with a Project Based Learning (PjBL) model and interactive web. This research aims to identify and analyze research trends of modern physics learning media based on interactive web using the PjBL model to improve scientific attitude. This research method is descriptive and analytical. The data used in this research was obtained from documents indexed by Google Scholar from 2015-2024 using Publish or Perish and Dimension.ai. Research procedures use PRISMA guidelines. The data analysis method uses bibliometric analysis assisted by VOS viewer software. The results of the analysis show that research trend indexed by Google Scholar from 2015 to 2024 has experienced a fluctuating increase. Where the research trend is with an increase in the number of publications every year, namely from 2015 to 2023. However, in 2024 the research trend on the modern physics learning media based on interactive web using the PjBL model to improve scientific attitude has decreased. There are many documents in the form of articles, proceedings, book chapters, edited, preprint and monograph books that discuss research about the trend. Key words that are often used in research of scientific attitude are critical thinking, scientific literacy, scientific approach, creativity, etc.

References

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Amaliyah, N. I., Aznam, N., & Dewi, S. S. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Scientific Attitude Through Experience Practicum Activities in Chemistry Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.6068

Bahtiar, B., Yusuf, Y., Doyan, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2023). Trend of Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research in 2012-2022: Contribution to Science Learning of 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3685

Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791

Burns, C. S. (2023). The Issues with Journal Issues: Let Journals Be Digital Libraries. Publications, 11(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010007

Cacciamani, S., Cesareni, D., Fiorilli, C., & Ligorio, M. B. (2022). Teachers’ Work Engagement, Burnout, and Interest toward ICT Training: School Level Differences. Education Sciences, 12(7), 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070493

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dewi Muliani, N. K., & Citra Wibawa, I. M. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Video Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i1.17664

DiCerbo, K. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(4), 502–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.931836

Doyan, A., Susilawati, Purwoko, A. A., Ibrahim, Ahzan, S., Gummah, S., Bahtiar, & Ikhsan, M. (2023). Trend Synthesis Thin Film Research as Electronic Device (A Review). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5764

Fitriansyah, R., Werdhiana, I. K., & Saehana, S. (2021). Pengaruh Pendekatan STEM dalam Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Sikap Ilmiah dan Kerja Ilmiah Materi IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i2.3598

Fry, S., & Seely, S. (2011). Enhancing Preservice Elementary Teachers’ 21st-Century Information and Media Literacy Skills. Action in Teacher Education, 33(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.569468

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Griffin, P. (2017). Assessing and Teaching 21st Century Skills: Collaborative Problem Solving as a Case Study. In Innovative Assessment of Collaboration (pp. 113–134). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33261-1_8

Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401

Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V.-T. (2020). Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947

Harvey, L. (2022). Editorial: Lee Harvey Future for printed journals. Quality in Higher Education, 28(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2022.2051233

Hikmah, N., & Jauhariyah, M. N. R. (2021). Meta-Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Improvement on Physics Learning. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i2.10585

Hikmawati, H., Suastra, I. W., Suma, K., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., & Rohani, R. (2021). Effect of Problem-Based Learning Integrated Local Wisdom on Student Hots and Scientific Attitude. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1118

Izzati, N., Tambunan, L. R., Susanti, S., & Siregar, N. A. R. (2019). Pengenalan Pendekatan STEM sebagai Inovasi Pembelajaran Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Anugerah, 1(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.31629/anugerah.v1i2.1776

Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1

Kaufman, K. J. (2013). 21 Ways to 21st Century Skills: Why Students Need Them and Ideas for Practical Implementation. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(2), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2013.786594

Knecht, A., Skawran, A., & Vogiatzi, S. M. (2020). Study of nuclear properties with muonic atoms. The European Physical Journal Plus, 135(10), 777. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00777-y

Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st Century Paradigms for Pre-Service Teacher Technology Preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903536272

Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575

Mahulae, P. S., Makahinda, T., Silangen, P. M., & Rampengan, A. M. (2023). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning Model in Learning Evaluation Course in Physics Education Study Programme. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.5891

Mynbayeva, A., Vishnevskaya, A., & Sadvakassova, Z. (2015). Diagnosis of Students Intellectual Potential on Pedagogical Specialties. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.191

Ogundiwin, O. A., Adewumi, G. S., Olabisi, O. L., & Asaaju, O. A. (2024). The Effect of Active Review Strategy on Student’s Attitude to Basic Science in Oyo State. Indonesian Values and Character Education Journal, 7(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.23887/ivcej.v7i1.78201

Oltarzhevskyi, D. O. (2019). Typology of contemporary corporate communication channels. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2019-0046

Ospankulova, E., Maxutov, S., Lathrop, R., Anuarova, L., & Balta, N. (2025). Science students’ attitudes, learning, critical thinking and engagement in project-based learning. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2445358. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2445358

Pelowski, M., Spee, B. T. M., Arato, J., Dörflinger, F., Ishizu, T., & Richard, A. (2022). Can we really ‘read’ art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease. Physics of Life Reviews, 43, 32–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2022.07.005

Ploj Virtič, M. (2022). Teaching science & technology: Components of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1916–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414

Purwaningsih, S., Dani, R., & Yuversa, E. (2024). Designing a Virtual Lab-based Learning Module Integrated with Project-based Learning for Modern Physics. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4495

Queiruga-Dios, M. Á., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Vázquez Dorrío, J. B. (2020). Citizen Science for Scientific Literacy and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals in Formal Education. Sustainability, 12(10), 4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283

Risnawati, Amir, Z., & Sari, N. (2018). The development of learning media based on visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (VAK) approach to facilitate students’ mathematical understanding ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012129. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012129

Rizaldi, D. R. & Fatimah, Z.. (2023). Efforts to Create an Interesting and Meaningful Physics Learning Environment with a Project-Based Learning Model. AMPLITUDO : Journal of Science and Technology Inovation, 2(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.56566/amplitudo.v2i1.11

Rossouw, M., & Steenkamp, G. (2025). Developing the critical thinking skills of first year accounting students with an active learning intervention. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(1), 101086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101086

Sakliressy, M. T., Sunarno, W., & Nurosyid, F. (2021). Students Scientific Attitude in Learning Physics using Problem Based Learning Model with Experimental and Project Methods. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8347

Santosa, T. A., Razak, A., Lufri, L., Zulyusri, Z., Fradila, E., & Arsih, F. (2021). Meta-Analisis: Pengaruh Bahan Ajar Berbasis Pendekatan STEM Pada Pembelajaran Ekologi. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 1(01), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v1i01.24

Savelsbergh, E. R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer, J. M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19, 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003

Sibille, K., Greene, A., & Bush, J. P. (2010). Preparing Physicians for the 21st Century: Targeting Communication Skills and the Promotion of Health Behavior Change. Annals of Behavioral Science and Medical Education, 16(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355111

Stamou, L. (2022). Cartography and Art: A Comparative Study Based on Color. Geographies, 2(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies2010007

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Suseno, B. A., & Fauziah, E. (2020). Improving Penginyongan Literacy in Digital Era Through E-Paper Magazine of Ancas Banyumasan. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3807680

Susilawati, Doyan, A., Rokhmat, J., & Muliyadi, L. (2023). Analysis Validation of Modern Physics Learning Media Based on Smartphone Integrated Project Based Learning to Improve Students’ Creativity and Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7888–7892. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5404

Susilawati, Harjono, A., & Firdaus, F. (2024). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills Through Project Based Learning Models: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(10), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.9381

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

Wahyudiati, D. (2022). Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers Through the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1278

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Author Biographies

Aris Doyan, Universitas Negeri Mataram

Susilawati, Universitas Negeri Mataram

Ahmad Harjono, Universitas Negeri Mataram

Syarful Annam, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Muhammad Ikhsan, Balai Publikasi Indonesia

Nuraini Rachma Ardianti, Balai Publikasi Indonesia

Syamsul Hakim, SMAN 1 Pringgarata

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Aris Doyan, Susilawati, Ahmad Harjono, Syarful Annam, Muhammad Ikhsan, Nuraini Rachma Ardianti, Syamsul Hakim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).