Analyze Constructivist Learning Experiences, Democratic Attitudes, Learning Independence, Students' Learning Motivation
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10459Published:
2025-02-28Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): FebruaryKeywords:
Constructivist learning experiences, Democratic attitudes, Learning independence, Students' learning motivationResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The aim was to analyze the constructivist learning experience, democratic attitude, learning independence, and students' motivation. The research subjects consisted of 116 students from the Indonesian language and literature education study program. The research method is a descriptive survey using a closed questionnaire instrument and a Likert scale. The data collection technique is using Google Forms. The data collected were then analyzed using descriptive quantitative and inferential analysis. The results showed that constructivist learning experience was 68% with a low category, democratic attitudes were 79% with a fairly category, learning independence was 71% with a fairly category, and learning motivation was 69.00% with a low category. Then, the very low correlation coefficient value is shown in the constructivist learning experience with a learning motivation of 0.263 with a very low correlation. The high correlation coefficient value on motivation with learning independence is 0.577. The findings of this study indicate that overall, constructivist learning experience, democratic attitudes, learning independence, and student motivation are still and need to be optimized for learning effectiveness.
References
Abdullah, N., Khaldun, I., & Musman, M. (2021). The Influence of Pocketbook to Improve Student Learning Outcomes and Motivation on Electron Configuration Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 298-304. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.647
Adnan, A., Salmawati, S., Usman, U., & Aldi, S. (2023). The Effect of Using a Quartet Card-Assisted Textbook on Biology Science Literacy Ability and Learning Motivation of Class XI High School Students. Biotech Journal, 11(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v3i2.277
Adnan, Saenab S., Rahmatullah, Almunawarah, R., Sahira, S., & Aldi, S. (2024). Citizen Science Project Learning Model. Central Lombok: P4I Publisher.
Adnan, Aldi S., Dzulkarnain A. F., Marliyah S. (2022). The Influence of Science Process Skills-Based e-LKPD on Learning Outcomes, Motivation, and Metacognitive Abilities of Class XI High School Students. Bioedscience, 6(1), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.22236/jbes/6310259
Aldi, S. Adnan, & Ismail. (2022). Effectiveness of e-LKPD Based on Science Process Skills Assisted Learning Management System Material Semester I Class XI SMA. Bioeduscience, 6(3), 338-344. https://doi.org/10.22236/j.bes/638846
Aldi, S., & Ismail, I. (2023). Science Process Skills: A Practical Guide to Train Higher Level Thinking Skills. Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara.
Aldi, S., Adnan, A., & Azis, A. A. (2024). The Influence of SaLDI Learning Model (Stimulation, Learning Community, Discovery, Inferring) on Activity, Motivation, and Learning Outcomes of Biology of High School Students. Journal of Science Education Research, 10(11), 9064-9077. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.9379
Aldi, S., Adnan, A., Ismail, I., & Dzulqarnain, A. F. (2022). Practicality Test of Electronic Learner Worksheet Based on Science Process Skills on SMA/MA Class XI Semester I material. Bioedusiana: Journal of Biology Education, 7(1), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.37058/bioed.v7i1.4642
Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the contribution of a constructivist learning environment to academic self-efficacy in higher education. Learning Environments Research, 18, 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10984-015-9174-5
Amin. (2021). Increasing students' learning motivation through problem-based learning (PBL) model. Journal of Basic Education and Teacher Training, 7(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v4i6.68410
Atler, K. (2015). An argument for a dynamic interrelated view of occupational experience. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.887991
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Barth, M. (2015). Implementing Constructivist Learning Environments in Higher Education to Promote Democratic Values. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 9(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203488355
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Budyaningsih, I., & Fikroh, R. A. (2023). Self-Organized Learning Environments (SOLE) Model Based on Blended Learning for Independence and Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Acid-Base Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.1671
Cahyani, A., & Abdul Aziz, T. (2023). Studi Literatur: Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Dan Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(5), 4122-4135. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i5.2407
Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.
Dari, U, Halim, A., & Ilyas, S. (2022). The Influence of the Use of the Approach of Blended Learning Model Rotation Based Moodle on Motivation and Cognitive Abilities of Students in the Subjects of Physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1100
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Springer.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.
Dhanty, D. R., Eddison, A., & Supentri, S. (2022). Pengaruh Sikap Demokratis Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMA Negeri 2 Bengkalis. Koloni, 1(2), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v1i2.52
Dini, A., Rahmatan, H., Muhibbudin, Nurmaliah, C., & Safrida. (2023). Application of the E-module combined with the Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Increase Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes on the Structure and Function of Plant Tissues. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4768–4776. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3857
Doyan, A., Gunada, W., & Adriani, I. A. D. (2017). Perbedaan Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Dan Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v1i1.1
Farnidayani, F., Akhyar, A., Winarty, A., Hasanah, H., & Saifuddin, S. (2024). The Role of Pancasila and Citizenship Education Teachers in Fostering Democratic Attitudes of Grade X Students in the Digital Era. Journal of Education Dedication, 8(1), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203488355
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Green, S. K., & Gredler, M. E. (2002). A review and analysis of constructivism for school-based practice. School Psychology Review, 31(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086142
Hashmi, A., Wishal, H., & Kiyani, T. (2021). The Constructivist Teaching Approach and Academic Achievement in English: An Empirical Evidence of Secondary School Students. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 8(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol8-iss1-2021(6-15)
Hendrayanto, D. N. (2019). Implications of the Constructivism Philosophy Perspective in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmmme.v9i1.48285
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Julia, M. A., Fitriani, N., & Setiawan, R. (2024). Generative Constructivism Learning Process in Elementary School. Journal of Primary School Teacher Education, 1(3). https://doi.org 10.30954/2230-7311.3.2022.5
Kosnik, C., Menna, L., Dharamshi, P., & Beck, C. (2018). Constructivism as a framework for literacy teacher education courses: the cases of six literacy teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1372742
Larison, K. (2021). On Beyond Constructivism. Science & Education, 31, 213-239. Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/cg6WB
Loyens, S. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: Introducing a multi-dimensional approach. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4
Masgumelar, Kukuh, N., & Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Constructivism Learning Theory: Implementation and Implications in Education and Learning. GHAITSA: Islamic Education, 2(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v2i1.188
Maulana, I., & Leonard, L. (2018). Constructivism approach with task and forced learning strategies. In National Seminar and Multidisciplinary Panel Discussion on Research and Community Service Results 2018.
Minarni, A., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2020). The role of constructivism-based learning in improving mathematical high order thinking skills of indonesian students. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p111-132
Mulyatno, C. B. (2022). Teachers' experiences in implementing learning after the end of community activity restrictions. Basicedu Journal, 6(5), 7799-7803. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3594
Mustafa, P., & Winarno, M. (2020). Development of a Textbook for Remedial Teaching in Physical Education for Undergraduate Students of Physical and Health Education at State University of Malang. Multilateral Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 19(1), 1-12. Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/3cBgp
Ndoa, Y. A. A., & Jumadi, J. (2022). Increasing Learning Motivation Through the Application of Physics E-Module Based on Flipped Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1556
Nurmala, D. A., Tripalupi, L. E., Suharsono, N., & Ekonomi, J. P. (2014). The effect of learning motivation and learning activities on accounting learning outcomes. Undiksha Journal of Economic Education, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v4i1.3046
Putri, S. E, & Alyani, F. (2023). The Effect of Using Multimedia-Based Learning on Motivation and Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9921–9927. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4396
Restiana, H., Fazira, E., & Al Fahri, A. (2024). Democracy in the classroom encourages elementary school children's participation in decision-making. Scientific Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(5). Retrieved from https://sejurnal.com/
Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist Pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623-1640. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Santrock, J. W. (2021). Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Septia-Tri, U. (2024). Implementation of Democratic Attitudes in Pkn Learning for Elementary School Grade IV Students. PGRI University Palembang.
Shalihudin, F., & Hermanto, F. (2021). The Role of Political Education in Building Students' Democratic Attitudes through the Intra-School Student Organisation at SMP Negeri 22 Semarang. Sociolium: Journal of Social Studies Learning, 3(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.15294/sosiolium.v3i1.45453
Smith, G., & Rabin, C. (2024). From Small Moments to Fundamental Principles of Democratic Education. Schools, 21, 91-116. https://doi.org/10.1086/729548
Sugrah, N. (2019). Implementation of constructivism learning theory in science learning. Humanika, Scientific Review of General Subjects, 19(2), 121-138 https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i3.71
Syamsinar, S., Ali, S, & Arsyad, M. (2023). The Effect of Critical Thinking Skills and Achievement Motivation on Student Physics Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2327
Tahar, I., & Enceng, E. (2006). The relationship between learning independence and learning outcomes in distance education. Journal of Open and Distance Education, 7(2), 91-101. Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/hziiM
Taupik, R. P., & Fitria, Y. (2023). Learning Motivation and Computational Thinking Ability of Elementary School Students in Learning Science. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7665–7671. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4826
Tawafak, R., Romli, A., Arshah, R., & Almaroof, R. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Technology Learning and Assessment Method on Academic Performance: Review Paper. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 14(4), 2241-2254. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/87117
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wafiqni, N., Amalia, S., & Sarifah, I. (2023). Hubungan Lingkungan Belajar dengan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Ibtida'i: Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar, 10(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.32678/ibtidai.v10i1.7829
Warouw, Z. W. M., Boyong, F. A., Suriani, N. W., Wowor, E. C., & Tumewu, W. A. (2023). The Effect of Outdoor Study Method Based on Democratic Learning in Improving Junior High Students’ Learning Outcomes in Science Subject. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2630
Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Democratic attitudes and learning motivation: A cross-sectional study among college students. International Journal of Educational Research, 101, https://doi.org/101542. 10.26524/ijpefs19112
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurmiah Muin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
