Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Performance in Animal Slaughtering Industry: Evaluation of Efficiency and Wastewater Quality

Authors

Iva Rustanti Eri Wardoyo , Ferdiansah Ananda Putra , Marlik , Ferry Kriswandana , Elmi Sumiyarsono

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10604

Published:

2025-03-31

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): March

Keywords:

Liquid waste, Pollutants, Slaughterhouse, Water quality, Waste treatment

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Wardoyo, I. R. E., Putra, F. A., Marlik, M., Kriswandana, F., & Sumiyarsono, E. (2025). Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Performance in Animal Slaughtering Industry: Evaluation of Efficiency and Wastewater Quality. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10604
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The slaughterhouse industry generates liquid waste with high organic loads and complex composition, which can pose environmental and public health risks. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a liquid waste treatment plant in a slaughterhouse. Quantitative methods were used for objective measurements, with sampling conducted at five key points in the wastewater treatment system. Parameters analyzed included pH, DO, COD, TSS, NH3, and fat, oil, and grease. The results showed that The Collecting Tank exhibited high COD reduction efficiencies between 87.52% and 93.89%, alongside TSS reductions ranging from 83.15% to 92.95%. Conversely, the Sequencing Batch Reactor demonstrated inefficiency in COD reduction, with outlet measurements exceeding inlet values; however, it achieved a 50.44% reduction in NH3 in one instance. The Anaerobic Tank showed significant COD reduction efficiencies from 72.66% to 98.27%, but NH3 reduction was negligible. Lastly, the Secondary Clarifier was inefficient in COD performance, with all tests indicating higher outlet results, while TSS efficiency was noted in only one test at 71.96%. The conclusion was although the Collecting Tank and Anaerobic Tank showed high efficiency in COD reduction, the Sequencing Batch Reactor and Secondary Clarifier units showed the NH3 reduction efficiency varied among the units tested.

References

Ahmad, F., Pathak, V., & Singh, A. (2023). Effect of slaughterhouse waste on sewage channel. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(3), 1227–1236. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.3.1968

Aksu, M., Tanattı, P. N., Erden, B., & Şengil, İ. A. (2021). Investigation of microalgal treatment for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater after the dissolved air flotation unit. Environmental Research and Technology, 4(2), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.845761

Al-Khuzaie, M. M., & Abdul Maulud, K. N. (2023). Optimization pollutants removals from wastewater treatment plant using artificial neural networks. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1167(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1167/1/012053

Bakiri, Z., & Nacef, S. (2013). A simple model for secondary clarifier: application to wastewater treatment plant. Desalination and Water Treatment, 51(7–9), 1571–1576. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.715073

Brantley, T., Bogue, J., Denny, K., Elouafiq, S., Madren, S., Nakhle, B., & Khattak, S. (2021). A novel approach to residence time distribution characterization in a mAb continuous process. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 118(9), 3486–3498. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27775

Bugajski, P., Chmielowski, K., & Kaczor, G. (2016). Reliability Of A Collective Wastewater Treatment Plant. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 17(4), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/64505

Bustillo-Lecompte, C., & Mehrvar, M. (2017). Slaughterhouse Wastewater: Treatment, Management and Resource Recovery. In Physico-Chemical Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/65499

Bustillo-Lecompte, C., Mehrvar, M., & Quiñones-Bolaños, E. (2016). Slaughterhouse Wastewater Characterization and Treatment: An Economic and Public Health Necessity of the Meat Processing Industry in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 04(04), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.44021

Cruz, K. D., Francisco, J. T. J., Mellendrez, K. J. M., & Pineda, J. M. F. (2019). Electrocoagulation treatment of swine slaughterhouse wastewater: effect of electrode material. In Q. Xiaosheng & O. Amahmid (Eds.), E3S Web of Conferences (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911700020

Daigger, G. T., Redmond, E., & Downing, L. (2018). Enhanced settling in activated sludge: design and operation considerations. Water Science and Technology, 78(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.287

Del Nery, V., Damianovic, M. H. Z., Moura, R. B., Pozzi, E., Pires, E. C., & Foresti, E. (2016). Poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant for high quality effluent. Water Science and Technology, 73(2), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.494

Dlamini, D. N., Basitere, M., Njoya, M., Ntwampe, S. K. O., & Kaskote, E. (2021). Performance Evaluation of a Biological Pre-Treatment Coupled with the Down-Flow Expanded Granular Bed Reactor (DEGBR) for Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater. Applied Sciences, 11(14), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146536

Drewnowski, J., Mąkinia, J., Szaja, A., Łagód, G., Kopeć, Ł., & Aguilar, J. A. (2019). Comparative Study of Balancing SRT by Using Modified ASM2d in Control and Operation Strategy at Full-Scale WWTP. Water, 11(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030485

Ezechi, E. H., Kutty, S. R. M., Isa, M. H., & Rahim, A. F. A. (2014). Treatment of Wastewater Using an Integrated Submerged Attached Growth System. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 567(6), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.567.167

Hadi Ghawi, A., & Naji Abudi, Z. (2012). Improving the Performance of Conventional Wastewater Treatment Plants. Iraqi Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.37650/ijce.2012.69006

Handriyono, R. E., & Rukmi, A. K. (2022). Redesign of Anaerobic-Aerobic Biofilter for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant In Textile Industry. Journal of Civil Engineering, Planning and Design, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.31284/j.jcepd.2022.v1i1.3049

Hegazy, M. H., & Gawad, M. A. (2016). Measuring and Evaluating the Performance of a Wastewater Treatment Plant. World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering. https://doi.org/10.11159/awspt16.111

Husam, A.-N., & Nassar, A. (2019). Slaughterhouses Wastewater Characteristics in the Gaza Strip. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 11(07), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2019.117051

Janna, H. (2016). Characterisation of Raw Sewage and Performance Evaluation of Al-Diwaniyah Sewage Treatment Work, Iraq. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 04(02), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2016.42030

Jensen, P. D., Yap, S. D., Boyle-Gotla, A., Janoschka, J., Carney, C., Pidou, M., & Batstone, D. J. (2015). Anaerobic membrane bioreactors enable high rate treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 97(5), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.02.009

Kurek, K., Bugajski, P., Operacz, A., Śliz, P., Jóźwiakowski, K., & Almeida, A. (2020). Reliability assessment of pollution removal of wastewater treatment plant using the method of Weibull. In K. Jóźwiakowski & T. Ciesielczuk (Eds.), E3S Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017101007

Lu, H., Meng, Z.-H., Zhang, B., Song, S., Zhan, S.-Y., Li, Y., Wu, Q.-L., Wang, H.-Z., & Guo, W.-Q. (2024). Deep Learning-Based Multiobjective Optimization for Balancing Effluent Quality, Operational Cost, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Control. ACS ES&T Water, 4(6), 2564–2577. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00073

Meiramkulova, K., Orynbekov, D., Saspugayeva, G., Aubakirova, K., Arystanova, S., Kydyrbekova, A., Tashenov, E., Nurlan, K., & Mkilima, T. (2020). The Effect of Mixing Ratios on the Performance of an Integrated Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment Plant for a Recyclable High-Quality Effluent. Sustainability, 12(15), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156097

Meyo, H. B., Njoya, M., Basitere, M., Ntwampe, S. K. O., & Kaskote, E. (2021). Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater (PSW) Using a Pretreatment Stage, an Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Reactor (EGSB), and a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR. Membranes, 11(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11050345

Mohammad, G., Benyamin, C., Zahra, K., Amir, T., & Reza, A. (2021). Sensitivity analysis of parameters affecting suspended growth in industrial wastewater treatment plants; with emphasis on economic performance criteria. Annals of Environmental Science and Toxicology, 1(6), 038–044. https://doi.org/10.17352/aest.000035

Nair, A., Hykkerud, A., & Ratnaweera, H. (2022). Estimating Phosphorus and COD Concentrations Using a Hybrid Soft Sensor: A Case Study in a Norwegian Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Water, 14(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030332

Nasr, F. A., & Mikhaeil, B. (2015). Treatment of domestic wastewater using modified septic tank. Desalination and Water Treatment, 56(8), 2073–2081. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.961174

Ospanov, K., Demchenko, A., & Kudaiberdi, Z. (2018). Experience of Suckling Perfection of Secondary Clarifier of Aeration Station in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 19(5), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/89814

Pangaribuan, A. F., Setiyawan, A. S., & Putri, D. W. (2024). Inactivation of Escherichia coli in domestic wastewater by modified septic tank treatment. In M. S. Abfertiawan, H. D. Ariesyady, I. R. S. Salami, & M. Firdayati (Eds.), E3S Web of Conferences (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448504010

Piani, L., Rizzardini, C. B., Papo, A., & Goi, D. (2014). Rheology Measurements for Online Monitoring of Solids in Activated Sludge Reactors of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/590961

Rabah, F. K. J., & Darwish, M. S. (2012). Characterization of Ammonia Removal from Municipal Wastewater Using Microwave Energy: Batch Experiment. Environment and Natural Resources Research, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v3n1p42

Sadeghi, S., & Jackson, W. A. (2024). Occurrence and Source of Phosphite (HPO 3 2– ) during Municipal Wastewater Treatments. ACS ES&T Water, 4(8), 3332–3339. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00208

Showkat, U., & Najar, I. A. (2019). Study on the efficiency of sequential batch reactor (SBR)-based sewage treatment plant. Applied Water Science, 9(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0882-8

Szeląg, B., Kiczko, A., Zaborowska, E., Mannina, G., & Mąkinia, J. (2022). Modeling nutrient removal and energy consumption in an advanced activated sludge system under uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Management, 323(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116040

Waangsir, F. W., Arnawa, G. P., Sadukh, J. J., & Suluh, D. G. (2023). Use of Various Filtaritaion Media in Lowering the Level of Water Hardness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1182–1186. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.3086

Waangsir, F. W., Arnawa, I. G. P., Sadukh, J. J., & Mauguru, E. M. (2023). Effectiveness of Reducing Hardness in the Filtration Process Using Mixed Media with Detention Time Variations. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11060–11064. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5592

Westgate, P. J., & Park, C. (2010). Evaluation of Proteins and Organic Nitrogen in Wastewater Treatment Effluents. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(14), 5352–5357. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100244s

Winck, J., Gottschalk, T., & Thommes, M. (2023). Predicting Residence Time and Melt Temperature in Pharmaceutical Hot Melt Extrusion. Pharmaceutics, 15(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051417

Yue, J., Zhao, Y., Sheng, Y., Cao, H., & Wen, H. (2020). Simultaneous Optimization of Structure and Operation for Coking Wastewater Biological Treatment Process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 59(11), 5022–5031. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06270

Zaky, T., Abdelgawad, H., Fatah, M., & Gamal, A. (2022). Performance Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Plants in El-Fayoum. International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches, 1(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijesr.2022.288813

Zamani, H., Golestani, H. A., Mousavi, S. M., Zhiani, R., & Hosseini, M. S. (2019). Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment using biological anaerobic and coagulation-flocculation hybrid process. Desalination and Water Treatment, 155(5), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.23914

Zhao, J.-L., Jiang, Y.-X., Yan, B., Wei, C., Zhang, L.-J., & Ying, G.-G. (2014). Multispecies acute toxicity evaluation of wastewaters from different treatment stages in a coking wastewater-treatment plant. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 33(9), 1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2638

Ziara, R. M. M., Li, S., Subbiah, J., & Dvorak, B. I. (2018). Characterization of Wastewater in Two U.S. Cattle Slaughterhouses. Water Environment Research, 90(9), 851–863. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X15131012187971

Author Biographies

Iva Rustanti Eri Wardoyo, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya

Ferdiansah Ananda Putra, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya

Marlik, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya

Ferry Kriswandana, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya

Elmi Sumiyarsono, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Iva Rustanti Eri Wardoyo, Ferdiansah Ananda Putra, Marlik, Ferry Kriswandana, Elmi Sumiyarsono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).