Training Evaluation Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model for Well Intervention Pressure Control Training
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10675Published:
2025-03-25Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): MarchKeywords:
Behavior level, Kirkpatrick evaluation model, Learning level, Reaction level, Results level, Well intervention pressure control trainingResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Well Intervention Pressure Control training using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model which includes four levels: Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Outcomes. The research method used was a mixed methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The evaluation was conducted on 62 trainees working in the oil and gas sector, with a randomly selected sample. The results showed that the training was successful in improving participants' understanding of the training material, including pressure control procedures, as well as other technical skills. At the Reaction level, the majority of participants responded positively to the materials and teaching. At the Learning level, there was a significant increase in pre-test and post-test scores, indicating the success of the training in improving participants' knowledge. At the Behavior level, participants successfully applied the skills learned in real field situations, while at the Outcome level, the training was shown to improve operational performance and safety. In conclusion, the training successfully met its objectives of enhancing participants' technical skills and professional attitudes, and contributed to improved organizational performance, especially in terms of safety and operational efficiency in the oil and gas industry.
References
Aigbedion, E., Ayorinde, O. B., & Adebisi, B. (2025). Leadership and Organizational Change in High-Risk Industries: A Model for Managing Engineering Change in Oil and Gas Operations. Gulf Journal of Advance Business Research, 3(2), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.51594/gjabr.v3i2.91
Akano, O. A., Hanson, E., Nwakile, C., & Esiri, A. E. (2024). Integrating Sustainability and Safety in High-Risk Industries: A Framework for Balancing Operational Efficiency and Environmental Responsibility. Global Journal of Research in Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(02), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.58175/gjrms.2024.2.2.0052
Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett Jr, W., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A Meta‐Analysis of the Relations Among Training Criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x
Al-Zoubi, M. O., Masa’deh, R., & Twaissi, N. M. (2025). Exploring the Relationship Among Structured-on-the Job Training, Mentoring, Job Rotation, Work Environment Factors and Tacit Knowledge Transfer. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 55(1), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2022-0199
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social Learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bougoulia, E., & Glykas, M. (2023). Knowledge Management Maturity Assessment Frameworks: A Proposed Holistic Approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 30(4), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1731
Caley, L., Williams, S. J., Spernaes, I., Thomas, D., Behrens, D., & Willson, A. (2021). Frameworks for Evaluating Education Programmes and Work Related Learning: A Scoping Review. Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(6), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2020-0157
Chaerudin, A. (2018). Manajemen Pendidikan dan Pelatihan SDM. Sukabumi: CV Jejak (Jejak Publisher).
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications.
Dadd, D., & Hinton, M. (2023). Performance Measurement and Evaluation: Applying Return on Investment (ROI) to Human Capital Investments. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(9), 2736–2764. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2021-0573
Dhoopar, A., Sihag, P., & Gupta, B. (2023). Antecedents and Measures of Organizational Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Literature. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100915
Djajasinga, I. N. D. (2022). Manajemen Dasar Resiko. CV Rey Media Grafika.
Durrani, O., & Zeeshan, Q. (2023). An Assessment of Risks in Oil and Gas Construction Projects in Pakistan: A Quantitative Approach Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. J. Eng. Manag. Syst. Eng, 2(3), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.56578/jemse020305
Dyreborg, J., Lipscomb, H. J., Nielsen, K., Törner, M., Rasmussen, K., Frydendall, K. B., Bay, H., Gensby, U., Bengtsen, E., Guldenmund, F., & Kines, P. (2022). Safety Interventions for the Prevention of Accidents at Work: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1234
Edwards, J. J., Coleman, D. A., Ritti-Dias, R. M., Farah, B. Q., Stensel, D. J., Lucas, S. J. E., Millar, P. J., Gordon, B. D. H., Cornelissen, V., Smart, N. A., Carlson, D. J., McGowan, C., Swaine, I., Pescatello, L. S., Howden, R., Bruce-Low, S., Farmer, C. K. T., Leeson, P., Sharma, R., & O’Driscoll, J. M. (2024). Isometric Exercise Training and Arterial Hypertension: An Updated Review. Sports Medicine, 54(6), 1459–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02036-x
Efthymiou, O. K., & Ponis, S. T. (2021). Industry 4.0 Technologies and Their Impact in Contemporary Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(21), 11643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111643
Egbumokei, P. I., Dienagha, I. N., Digitemie, W. N., Onukwulu, E. C., & Oladipo, O. T. (2024). Automation and Worker Safety: Balancing Risks and Benefits in Oil, Gas, and Renewable Energy Industries. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(4), 2582–7138. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2024.5.4.1273-1283
Egila, A. E., Kamal, M. M., Mangla, S. K., Rich, N., & Tjahjono, B. (2025). Highly Reliable Organisations and Sustainability Risk Management: Safety Cultures in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Supply Chain Sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(2), 2680–2701. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4091
Erbay, M., Javed, M. S., Nelson, J. C., Benzerroug, S., Karkkulainen, E. A., & Enriquez, C. E. (2024). The Relationship between Leadership and Communication, and The Significance of Efficient Communication in Online Learning. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 2065–2076. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5650
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Gualtieri, L., Öhler, M., Revolti, A., & Dallasega, P. (2024). A Visual Management and Augmented-Reality-Based Training Module for the Enhancement of Short and Long-Term Procedural Knowledge Retention in Complex Machinery Setup. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 196, 110478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110478
Ivankova, N. V, Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Kim, T., Perera, L. P., Sollid, M.-P., Batalden, B.-M., & Sydnes, A. K. (2022). Safety Challenges Related to Autonomous Ships in Mixed Navigational Environments. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 21(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-022-00277-z
Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Association for Talent Development.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. FT Press.
Leroy, H., Anisman-Razin, M., & Detert, J. (2024). Leadership Development is Failing Us. Here’s How to Fix It. MIT Sloan Management Review, 65(2), 48–53. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/leadership-development-is-failing-us-heres-how-to-fix-it/
Liu, S., Bao, S., Yang, D., & Zhang, J. (2024). Research on the Decision-Making of Work Safety Investment in Industrial Park Enterprises: Evidence from Behavioral Experiments. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1295536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1295536
ÖZ, Ö. Ü. T. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Organizational Behavior on Safety Culture in Aviation Management: A Qualitative Study. Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(Özel Sayı), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.52122/nisantasisbd.1582643
Phillips, J. J. (2012). Return on Investment in Training and Performance Improvement Programs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080516257
Reynolds, C. F., Jeste, D. V, Sachdev, P. S., & Blazer, D. G. (2022). Mental Health Care for Older Adults: Recent Advances and New Directions in Clinical Practice and Research. World Psychiatry, 21(3), 336–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20996
Rouse, P., & Putterill, M. (2003). An Integral Framework for Performance Measurement. Management Decision, 41(8), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310496305
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
Schulte, P. A., Iavicoli, I., Fontana, L., Leka, S., Dollard, M. F., Salmen-Navarro, A., Salles, F. J., Olympio, K. P. K., Lucchini, R., Fingerhut, M., Violante, F. S., Seneviratne, M., Oakman, J., Lo, O., Alfredo, C. H., Bandini, M., Silva-Junior, J. S., Martinez, M. C., Cotrim, T., Omokhodion, F., & Fingerhut, M. (2022). Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710842
Stemp, J. D., Ghosh, D., Khan, U. R., & Boyd, J. H. (2022). The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-Learning: A Rapid Review. Online Learning Journal, 26(4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3115
Susita, S. E. D., & Busharmaidi, M. S. (2024). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Tang, K. H. D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Occupational Health and Safety Risk Management of Construction, Mining, and Oil and Gas Sectors: Advances and Prospects. J. Eng. Res. Rep, 26(6), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i61177
Thusini, S., Milenova, M., Nahabedian, N., Grey, B., Soukup, T., Chua, K.-C., & Henderson, C. (2022). The Development of the Concept of Return-on-Investment from Large-Scale Quality Improvement Programmes in Healthcare: An Integrative Systematic Literature Review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1492. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08832-3
Ugbebor, F., Aina, O., Abass, M., & Kushanu, D. (2024). Employee Cybersecurity Awareness Training Programs Customized for SME Contexts to Reduce Human-Error Related Security Incidents. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 3(3), 382–409. https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol3.n3.p382-409
Author Biographies
Karnando, Universitas Negeri Padang
Krismadinata, Universitas Negeri Padang
Ambiyar, Universitas Negeri Padang
M. Giatman, Universitas Negeri Padang
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karnando, Krismadinata, Ambiyar, M. Giatman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
