How are the Characteristics of Integrated Assessment Instruments to Measure Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes of High School Students?

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1082

Published:

2021-12-25

Issue:

Vol. 7 No. SpecialIssue (2021): December

Keywords:

integrated assessment instrument, critical thinking skills, scientific attitudes, polytomous

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Hasanatin, M., & Rohaeti, E. . (2021). How are the Characteristics of Integrated Assessment Instruments to Measure Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes of High School Students?. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1082

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research aimed to develop an integrated assessment instrument and to study the instrument’s characteristics. This research used 4-D development model of which the stages included defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. The primary product is validated by expert judgment. This research involved 274 mathematics and natural science eleventh-grade students of Senior High Schools in Sleman district, Yogyakarta. The polytomous data generated by the instrument trial was analyzed using the WINSTEPS 3.73 program and the Partial Credit Model 1-Parameter Logistic (PCM 1-PL) approach. Data collecting techniques included interviews, questionnaires, and tests. Data collecting instruments included interview guidelines, a question item validation sheet, and the integrated assessment instrument an essay test. The result of the research shows that the integrated assessment instrument has 0.93 of Aiken validation value. All tryout test items were stated to fit with the PCM 1-PL based on the criteria for the lowest and the highest limit outfit MNSQ 0.5 and 1.5. Item reliability was 0.96 and person reliability was 0.71. The difficulty level of question items was good, because of the range from -1.05 to +1.01 logit. Therefore, the integrated assessment instrument is suitable to be applied to measure the student’s critical thinking skills and scientific attitudes.

References

Aliakbari, M., & Sadeghdaghighi, A. (2013). Teachers’ perception of the barriers to critical thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.031

Arisa, N.S., Khaldun, I., & Safrida. (2021). The effect of search, solve, create and share learning models to improve students ‘critical thinking skills on acid and basic titration materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 191-195.

Baker, F. B. (2001). The basic of item response theory. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.

Balistreri, S., Tony, F., Giacomo, D., Noisette, I., & Ptak, T. (2012). Global education: connections, concepts, and careers. The College Board, 33. Retrieved from: www.collegeboard.org

Bond, T.G., & Fox, Ch.M. (2007). Applying the rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human science (2nd Ed). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Boone, William. J., Staver, John. R., Yale, & Melissa. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Cantos, A.E., Alday, M.G.K.A., Alog, K.J.A., Asi, K.J.G., Calacal, R.H.U., & Britiller, M. C. (2015). Changing learning needs of student nurses: input to the nursing curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 108–119. Retrieved from: www.apjmr.com

Chebii, R., Wachanga, S., & Kiboss, J. (2012). Effects of science process skills mastery learning approach on student’s acquisition of selected chemistry practical skills in school. Creative Education, 3(8), 1291-1296. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38188

Dewantara, D., Hasan, S. M., & Annur, S. (2018). The development of student worksheet by using guided inquiry learning model to train student’s scientific attitude. Unnes Science Education Journal, 7(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v7i1.15799

Espinosa, A. A., Monterola, S. L. C., & Punzalan, A. E. (2013). Career-oriented performance tasks in Chemistry: effects on students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Education Research International. 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/834584

Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theori: principles and applications. New York: Kluwer Nijhof Publishing. https://doi.org.10. 1007/978-94-017-1988-9.

Heng, Y. C., Joo, C.E., Basri, A. A. M., Leng. H. H., Bari, N. A., Suleiman, R., Som, A. M., Mustafa, S., Mohamed, S. H. O, Yusof, Z. M., Yazid, Z., & Majid, Z. A. (2012). Integrated curriculum for secondary school (curriculum specification: science form 2). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia

Ilfiana, A., Widodo, W., & Setiarso, P. (2021). The Improvement of student’s critical thinking skills through the development of science learning material based socioscientific issues with interactive multimedia-assisted on gadget. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 496-501. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.764

Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Lfx, E. W., & Suyanta, S. (2017). The development of an integrated assessment instrument for measuring analytical thinking and science process skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983907

Ismayawati, B., Purwoko, A.A., & Muntari. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah (Pbm) dalam setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT dan GI terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kimia peserta didik SMAN 1 Aikmel. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 2(1). https://doi.org.1029303/jppipa.v2i1.33 [Indonesian]

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Bahri, A., & Dinnurriya, M. S. (2016). Improving students’ critical thinking skills through Remap NHT in biology classroom. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318093694

McPhun, H. (2010). Integrated assesments-engaging ways to enhance learner outcomes. Good Practice Publication Grant, 1-9. Retrieved from: https://ako.ac.nz/assets/Knowledge-...centre/ pdf

Olasehinde, K. J., & Olatoye, R. A. (2014). Scientific attitude, attitude to science and science achievement of senior secondary school students in katsina state, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(1), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n1p445

Ozden, B., & Yenice, N. (2014). An analysis of the secondary education students’ scientific attitudes*. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 1(2), 86-97. Retrieved from www.ijcer.net

Pitafi, A.I. & Farooq, M. (2012). Measurement of scientific attitude of secondary school students in Pakistan. Academic Rearch International, 2(2), 379–392. Retrieved from: www.savap.org.pk%5Cnwww.journals.savap.org.pk

Priska, M., Peni, N., & Wao, Y.P. (2021). Development of acid-base devices integrating ARCS motivation strategy in problem-solving learning model scientific attitude and critical thinking skills of students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1126

Qing, Z., Ni, S., & Hong, T. (2010). Developing critical thinking disposition by task-based learning in chemistry experiment teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4561–4570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.731

Stein, B., Haynes, A., Redding, M., Ennis, T., & Cecil, M. (2007). Assessing critical thinking in STEM and beyond. Innovations in E-Learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_14

Stephenson, N. S., & Sadler-Mcknight, N. P. (2016). Developing critical thinking skills using the Science Writing Heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00102a

Subali, B. (2019). Prinsip asesmen dan evaluasi pembelajaran edisi ketiga. Yogyakarta: UNY Press. [Indonesian]

Sudarmini, Y., Kosim., & Hadiwijaya, A.S. (2015). Pembelajaran fisika berbasis inkuiri terbimbing dengan menggunakan LKS untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari sikap ilmiah siswa Madrasah Aliyah Qamarul Huda Bagu Lombok Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v1i1.4 [Indonesian]

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Jakarta: Trim Komunikata. [Indonesian]

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D., & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Zhou, Q., Huang, Q., & Tian, H. (2013). Developing student’s critical thinking skills by task-based learning in chemistry experiment teaching. Creative Education, 4(12A), 40-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412A1006

Author Biographies

Mir'atul Hasanatin, Yogyakarta State University

Eli Rohaeti, Yogyakarta State University

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Mir'atul Hasanatin, Eli Rohaeti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).