Comparison of Cooperative Learning Models of Reciprocal Teaching Type and Cooperative Jigsaw Type on Students' Learning Outcomes in Animalia Material Class X MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Tapalang

Authors

Jirana , Mesra Damayanti , Rahmadina , Ruth Megawati

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.11021

Published:

2025-05-25

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 5 (2025): May

Keywords:

Jigsaw, Learning model, Learning outcomes, Reciprocal Teaching, SMAN 1 Tapalang

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Jirana, Damayanti, M., Rahmadina, & Megawati, R. (2025). Comparison of Cooperative Learning Models of Reciprocal Teaching Type and Cooperative Jigsaw Type on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Animalia Material Class X MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Tapalang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(5), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.11021

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research aims to compare student learning achievements on the topic Animalia class X MIPA at SMA Negeri 1 Tapalang using two cooperative learning approaches, namely Reciprocal Teaching and Jigsaw. The research method used is quantitative descriptive with a Nonequivalent Control Group research design. The sample was taken using a nonprobability sampling technique with purposive sampling, involving two classes, namely X MIPA 1 as a Jigsaw class and X MIPA 3 as a Reciprocal Teaching class. The research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Tapalang, Tapalang District, Mamuju Regency, West Sulawesi Province. Data collection was carried out through pretest and posttest, then analyzed using SPSS version 24 statistical software. The results of the study showed that there was a significant difference between the Reciprocal Teaching and Jigsaw cooperative learning models on student learning achievement, as seen from the results of the posttest score which was significant (p = 0.000 ). The null hypothesis (Ho) can be rejected and the alternative hypothesis (H1) can be accepted. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in student learning outcomes between the Reciprocal Teaching and Jigsaw cooperative learning models in Animalia class X MIPA material at SMA Negeri 1 Tapalang. Based on the achievement of student learning achievements in the two classes, namely the Jigsaw and Reciprocal Teaching classes, it can be concluded that the Reciprocal Teaching type cooperative learning model is considered more effective than the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model.

References

Abo-Khalil, A. G. (2024). Integrating sustainability into higher education challenges and opportunities for universities worldwide. Heliyon, 10(9), e29946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29946

Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on student’s performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Al-Said, K. (2023). Influence of teacher on student motivation: Opportunities to increase motivational factors during mobile learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 13439–13457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11720-w

Borgonovi, F., Pokropek, M., & Pokropek, A. (2023). Relations between academic boredom, academic achievement, ICT use, and teacher enthusiasm among adolescents. Computers & Education, 200, 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104807

Chen, T., Luo, H., Wang, P., Yin, X., & Yang, J. (2023). The role of pre-class and in-class behaviors in predicting learning performance and experience in flipped classrooms. Heliyon, 9(4), e15234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15234

Cochon Drouet, O., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., & Margas, N. (2023). Effects of the Jigsaw method on student educational outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1216437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216437

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dost, G., & Mazzoli Smith, L. (2023). Understanding higher education students’ sense of belonging: A qualitative meta-ethnographic analysis. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(6), 822–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2191176

Fischer, J., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2024). How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2206986

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hayashi, Y., Shimojo, S., & Kawamura, T. (2025). Scripted interventions versus reciprocal teaching in collaborative learning: A comparison of pedagogical and teachable agents using a cognitive architecture. Learning and Instruction, 96, 102057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102057

Ho, D. G. E., Sa’adi, M., He, D., & Hoon, C.-Y. (2023). Silence over the wire: Student verbal participation and the virtual classroom in the digital era. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09834-4

Hwang, W.-Y., Wu, T.-H., & Shadiev, R. (2023). Applications of Reciprocal Teaching in Flipped Classroom to Facilitate High Level of Cognition for Sustainable Learning Practices. Sustainability, 15(7), 5848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075848

Izadpanah, S., & Rezaei, Y. M. (2022). Causal explanation of academic enthusiasm based on the interaction of teachers and English language learners: Self-regulation, academic hope, and academic engagement among English language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 997903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997903

Karlen, Y., & Hertel, S. (2024). Inspiring self-regulated learning in everyday classrooms: Teachers’ professional competences and promotion of self-regulated learning. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 52(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-024-00196-3

Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: A Systemic Framework for Connecting the SDGs to Educational Outcomes. Sustainability, 11(21), 6104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216104

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Liu, J., Tahri, D., & Qiang, F. (2024). How Does Active Learning Pedagogy Shape Learner Curiosity? A Multi-Site Mediator Study of Learner Engagement among 45,972 Children. Journal of Intelligence, 12(6), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12060059

Liu, Z., Liu, H., Tian, Y., Nie, X., & Liu, M. (2025). Relationships between interactive network patterns and students’ cognitive and emotional processes: Evidence from the individual and group levels. Computers & Education, 232, 105309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105309

Mafarja, N., Mohamad, M. M., Zulnaidi, H., & Fadzil, H. M. (2023). Using of reciprocal teaching to enhance academic achievement: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(7), e18269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18269

Martin-Alguacil, N., Avedillo, L., Mota-Blanco, R., & Gallego-Agundez, M. (2024). Student-Centered Learning: Some Issues and Recommendations for Its Implementation in a Traditional Curriculum Setting in Health Sciences. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111179

Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., Slater, J., & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306

Moshtari, M., & Safarpour, A. (2024). Challenges and strategies for the internationalization of higher education in low-income East African countries. Higher Education, 87(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-00994-1

Muhammadiah, M., Hamsiah, A., Muzakki, A., Nuramila, N., & Fauzi, Z. A. (2022). The Role of the Professional Teacher as the Agent of Change for Students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6887–6896. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1372

Oo, T. Z., Magyar, A., & Habók, A. (2021). Effectiveness of the reflection-based reciprocal teaching approach for reading comprehension achievement in upper secondary school in Myanmar. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09707-8

Pada, P., & Amir, F. (2022). Elevating Social Sciences Learning Outcomes: TGT Type Cooperative Learning Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(4), 620–626. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i4.54046

Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4

Schildkamp, K., Van Der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Scott-Barrett, J., Johnston, S.-K., Denton-Calabrese, T., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2023). Nurturing curiosity and creativity in primary school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104356

Stephens, A. N., Collette, B., Hidalgo-Munoz, A., Fort, A., Evennou, M., & Jallais, C. (2024). Help-seeking for driving anxiety: Who seeks help and how beneficial is this perceived to be? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 105, 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.003

Thiele, S., & Kordts, R. (2025). You know it, you like it – student appreciation of active learning methods. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(3), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2318461

Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: An Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä, M., Kokko, A., Manninen, J., Vartiainen, H., Sointu, E., & Hirsto, L. (2021). Learning environments preferred by university students: A shift toward informal and flexible learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09339-6

Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! For learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Yang, X. (2023). A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning. TechTrends, 67(4), 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9

Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Strategies, Methods, and Supports for Developing Skills within Learning Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090231

Zhou, Q., & Zhang, H. (2025). Flipped Classroom Teaching and ARCS Motivation Model: Impact on College Students’ Deep Learning. Education Sciences, 15(4), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040517

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1

Author Biographies

Jirana, Univeritas Sulawesi Barat

Mesra Damayanti, Universitas Sulawesi Barat

Rahmadina, Universitas Sulawesi Barat

Ruth Megawati, Universitas Cenderawasih

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jirana, Mesra Damayanti, Rahmadina, Ruth Megawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).