Teachers’ Perspective on Scientific Literacy in Science Learning: Descriptive Survey

Authors

Indra Budiman , Ida Kaniawati , Anna Permanasari , Iwa Lukmana

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1123

Published:

2021-12-08

Issue:

Vol. 7 No. SpecialIssue (2021): December

Keywords:

Science teacher, scientific literacy, science learning

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Budiman, I., Kaniawati, I. ., Permanasari, A. ., & Lukmana, I. . (2021). Teachers’ Perspective on Scientific Literacy in Science Learning: Descriptive Survey. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1123
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Survey of questionnaire-based research was conducted to assess the perspective of junior high school (JHS) science teachers on scientific literacy in science learning. Four perspectives for teachers in JHS on scientific literacy were obtained from the research results of the experiments, namely the reading of scientific texts, scientific knowledge, the use of science in everyday life and the use of science-based learning tools. The majority of participants chose the response choice to train all students to apply science learning results in decision-making on daily life challenges. Thus, JHS Science Teachers in Purwakata Regency have a variety of scientific literacy perspectives, but there is no perspective that is considered outside the context of scientific literacy

References

Barnes, C., Angle, J., & Montgomery, D. (2015). Teachers Describe Epistemologies of Science Instruction Through Q Methodology. School Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12111.

Braun, I., & Nückles, M. (2014). Scholarly Holds Lead Over Popular and Instructional: Text Type Influences Epistemological Reading Outcomes. Science Education, 98(5), 867–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21117.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2),77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Chowdhury, M. (2016). Emphasizing Morals, Values, Ethics, and Character Education in Science Education And Science Teaching. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 4– 2. Retrieved from. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095995

Clark, S. K., & Lott, K. (2017). Integrating science inquiry and literacy instruction for young children. The Reading Teacher, 70(6), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/t

Commission, E. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: Reform proposals for the 780 education system in Hong Kong. Education Commission.

Daane, A. R., Haglund, J., Robertson, A. D., Close, H. G., & Scherr, R. E. (2018). The pedagogical value of conceptual metaphor for secondary science teachers. Science Education, 102(5), 1051–1076. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21451.

Debarger, A. H., Penuel, W. R., Moorthy, S., Beauvineau, Y., Kennedy, C. A., & Boscardin, C. K. (2016). Investigating Purposeful Science Curriculum Adaptation as a Strategy to Improve Teaching and Learning. Science Education, 101(1), 66–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21249.

Ekici, F. T., & AydoÄŸdu, M. (2014). Perceptions of Prospective Science Teachers about Science and Technology Concepts and Scientific-Technological Literacy. International Research in Education, 2(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.5296/Ire.V2i1.4965

Faller, S. E. (2017). Reading and Writing as Scientists? Text Genres and Literacy Practices in Girls. Middle-Grade Science. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.698.

Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a Measure of Scientific Literacy for Middle School Students. Science Education, 98(4), 549–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115.

Hand, B., Park, S., & Suh, J. K. (2018). Examining Teachers’ Shifting Epistemic Orientations in Improving Students’ Scientific Literacy through Adoption of The Science Writing Heuristic Approach. Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education, 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_20

Heriyanto, H. (2018). Thematic Analysis sebagai Metode Menganalisa Data untuk Penelitian Kualitatif. Anuva, 2(3), 317. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.2.3.317-324 [Indonesian]

Kersten, S. (2017). Becoming nonfiction authors: Engaging in science inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 71(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1577.

Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2016). Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education? Science Education, 101(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21251.

Koomen, M. H., Rodriguez, E., Hoffman, A., Petersen, C., & Oberhauser, K. (2018). Authentic science with citizen science and student-driven science fair projects. Science Education, 102(3), 593–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21335.

Morales-Doyle, D. (2017). Justice-centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. Science Education, 101(6), 1034–1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21305.

Nam, Y., & Chen, Y. C. (2017). Promoting argumentative practice in socio-scientific issues through a science inquiry activity. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3431–3461. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00737a

Nath, S., Tang, B., & Yang, K. (2015). Enhancing Scientific Literacy: A Resource for Teachers. Journal of Student Science and Technology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.13034/jsst.v8i1.51

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.10.

OECD. (2006). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en

OECD. (2015). Pisa 2015 Results in Focus. OECD Publishing.

Polman, J. L., Newman, A., Saul, E. W., & Farrar, C. (2014). Adapting Practices of Science Journalism to Foster Science Literacy. Science Education, 98(5), 766–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21114.

Rasdiana, E., Muhamad, F. N., & Kurniaji, R. (2016). Pemanfaatan Rinfo Form Sebagai Media Pembuatan Kuesioner Dalam Proses Pengumpulan Data Pada Perguruan Tinggi. Technomedia Journal, 1(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.33050/tmj.v1i1.21 [Indonesian]

Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I. D., & Hidayat, A. (2016). Identify Scientific Literacy from the Science Teachers’ Perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.15294/Jpii.V5i2.7689.

Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I. D., & Permana, I. (2017). Professional Development Model for Science Teachers Based On Scientific Literacy. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 166, 12037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/166/1/012037.

Sarkar, M., & Corrigan, D. (2013). Bangladeshi Science Teachers’ Perspectives of Scientific Literacy And Teaching Practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1117–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9450-8.

Schulte, T. (2014). Students’ And Teachers’ Perceptions Of School-Based Scientific Literacy Priorities And Practice: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between Cyprus And Germany. Conference Paper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264422162.

Sharma, A., & Buxton, C. A. (2015). Human-Nature Relationships in School Science: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Middle-Grade Science Textbook. Science Education, 99(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21147

Van Dijk, E. M. (2014). Understanding the Heterogeneous Nature of Science: A Comprehensive Notion of PCK for Scientific Literacy. Science Education, 98(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21110

Author Biographies

Indra Budiman, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Ida Kaniawati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung

Anna Permanasari, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung

Iwa Lukmana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Indra Budiman, Ida Kaniawati, Anna Permanasari, Iwa Lukmana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).