Science Reasoning: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

Ina Ana Khoeriah , Irvan Permana , Didit Ardianto

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1135

Published:

2022-04-30

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): April

Keywords:

Bibliometric analysis, Science reasoning, Reasoning critical thinking, HOTS Science.

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Khoeriah, I. A., Permana, I. ., & Ardianto, D. . (2022). Science Reasoning: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1135
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
521
May 01 '22May 04 '22May 07 '22May 10 '22May 13 '22May 16 '22May 19 '22May 22 '22May 25 '22May 28 '227.0
| |

Abstract

Improving critical thinking in science classes can be accomplished by developing reasoning thinking approaches. The goal of studying science reasoning in science classes is to see how much of this strategy is used in solving science problems and developing Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) that are based on critical thinking. Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 100 articles were retrieved from the Google Scholar database and the Publishing or Perish (PoP) program. Mendeley desktop, a referencing management software, was then used to handle the selected references. Once the database was handled, this research employed VOS viewer software to categorize and visualize it. In general, this study provides a solid foundation for further research into "science reasoning."

References

Achor, E. E., Agogo, P., & Duguryil, A. (2015). Effects of Cognitive Reasoning Ability and Prior Exposure to Content on Basic Science Achievement of Upper Basic Two Students in Plateau State. Journal of Science, Technology …. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2621221

Baneyx, A. (2008). “Publish or Perish†as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56(6), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0

Bilik, O., Damar, H. T., Ozdagoglu, G., Ozdagoglu, A., & Damar, M. (2019). Identifying trends, patterns, and collaborations in nursing career research: A bibliometric snapshot (1980–2017). Collegian. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2019.04.005

Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Lean and green-a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064

Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education …. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x

Jing Shi. (2021). Discussion on the Logical Basis of Critical Thinking. International Journal of Philosophy. 9 (2), 100-105. https://doi:10.11648/j.ijp20210902.14

Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y

Martins, O.O.; & Oyebanji, P.K. (2000). The effects of inquiry and lecture methods on the cognitive achievement of integrated science students. JSTAN, 35 (1&2), 31-35.

Martinez-Lopez, F. J., Merigo, J. M., Gazquez-Abad, J. C., & Ruiz-Real, J. L. (2019). Industrial marketing management: Bibliometric overview since its foundation. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.014

Parmar, A., Ganesh, R., & Mishra, A. K. (2019). The top 100 cited articles on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A citation analysis. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2019.03.025

Setyaningsih, I., Indarti, N., & Jie, F. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of the term “green manufacturingâ€. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 11(3), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmcp.2018.093500

Sein S., Lee K., Ha M., (2018). Motivated Reasoning as Obstacle of Scientific Thinking: Focus on the Cases of Next-Generation Researchers in the Field of Science and Technology. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.5.635

Shukla, N., Merigó, J. M., Lammers, T., & Miranda, L. (2020). Half a century of computer methods and programs in biomedicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1970 to 2017. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 183, 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105075

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOS viewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001

Zulkipli, Z. A., Yusof, M. M. M., Ibrahim, N., & Dalim, S. F. (2020). Identifying Scientific Reasoning Skills of Science Education Students. … Journal of University Education. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274288

Author Biographies

Ina Ana Khoeriah

Interested in research in the field of science education,
especially in learning models to improve the quality of education
and student abilities.

Irvan Permana, Universitas Pakuan

Didit Ardianto, Universitas Pakuan

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Ina Ana Khoeriah, Irvan Permana, Didit Ardianto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).