The strategy of Science Learning in Curriculum 2013 to Increase the Value of Science’s Program for International Student Assessment (PISA)
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1185Published:
2022-01-06Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): JanuaryKeywords:
Natural Science, PISA, HOTS, Curriculum 2013Research Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Natural Science subjects consisting of Physics, Chemistry and Biology are given to all students starting from elementary school to equip students with logical, analytical, systematic, critical, and creative thinking skills, as well as the ability to work together. According to the Organization for Economics Cooperation and Development (OECD) in 2013, the conception of Science literacy in the PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) supports the importance of students developing a solid understanding of the concepts of pure science and science education and the benefits involved in exploration in the abstract world that exists. on the universe. This study resulted in an analysis of science learning strategies for students of the Department of Science Education that support higher order thinking skills in Science. Two (2) parts of the material will be discussed more focused, namely (a) learning materials and (b) learning strategies. With the learning syllabus that supports the High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) questions, the opportunity to increase the value of Science education (Physics, Chemistry, Biology) is greater, one of which is the preparation of challenging questions. Challenging science questions will meet the criteria for high-level questions (PISA has question levels from level 1 to level 6). HOTS questions support the development of a solid understanding of pure Science and Science Education concepts. The data sources used in the preparation of this research are the results of the 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2015 and 2018. PISA surveys and the 2013 curriculum book sourced from the Ministry of Education and Culture.
References
Aini, R.N., & Siswono, T.Y.E. (2014). Analisis Pemahaman Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Aljabar pada PISA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. (33). 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457537
Akhsan, H., Wiyono, K., Ariska, M., & Melvany, N. E. (2020). Development of HOTS (higher order thinking skills) test instruments for the concept of fluid and harmonic vibrations for high schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012071
Ariska, M. (2015). Studi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Sub Konsep Rangkaian Listrik Arus Searah di Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 1 Palembang. J. Inov. dan Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–154. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v2i2.2616
Ariska, M. Akhsan, H. Muslim, M. and Azizah, S.N. (2021). Pemahaman Konsep Awal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Terhadap Materi Benda-Benda Langit. JIPF. 5(3). pp 224-235. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i3.3523
Ayoubi, Z., El Takach, S., & Rawas, M. (2017). Improving the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) among cycle 3 in-service chemistry teachers attending the training program at the faculty of education, Lebanese University. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 3(2), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.326753
Djaali, D., & Muljono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
Fatmawati, D., & Ekawati, R. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika PISA-like pada konten change and relationship untuk siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(5), 29-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jpm.8.1.1860.25-42
Luke A., Comber, B., & O’Brien, J. (1994). Making community texts objects of study. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 17 (2), 139-145.
Maulana, A. & Hasnawati. (2016). “Deskripsi Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII-2 SMP Negeri 15 Kendari.†Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika 4(2):1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/ai.v14i1.1109
McKenna, M.C., & Robinson, R.D. (1990). Content literacy: A definition and implications. Journal of Reading, 34, 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2021.1935311
Novita, R., Zulkardi, Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring primary students problem solving ability by doing tasks like pisa’s question. Journal on Mathematics Education. 3(2), 133-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.013
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Result in focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytcal Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Assesment and analitycal framework. Paris: OECD Publishing
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics,reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Putri, R.I.I., & Zulkardi, 2019. Designing jumping task on percent using PMRI. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME), 3(1), 105-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i1.12208
Rosalina, A.D. (2017). Profil Pemecahan Masalah PISA pada Konten Change and Relationship Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Linguistik, Logis – Matematis, dan Visual-Spasial. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. 3(6). 53–62. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v6n3.p%25p
Saputri, N. W., &Zulkardi. (2020). Pengembangan LKPD pemodelan matematika siswa SMP menggunakan konteks ojek online. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 1-14 https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.1.6825.1-14
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on mathematics education. 2(2), 95-126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126
Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, M. (2011). Using PISA and TIMSS Mathematics Assessments to Identify the Relative Strengths of Students in Western and Asian Countries. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56, 67–89. https://doi.org/10.3966/2073753X2011035601003.
Author Biographies
Hartono, Universitas Sriwijaya
Ratu Ilma Indra Putri, Universitas Sriwijaya
Rita Inderawati, Universitas Sriwijaya
Melly Ariska, Universitas Sriwijaya
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hartono, Ratu Ilma Indra Putri, Rita Inderawati, Melly Ariska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
